Evaluation on Chemical Cleaning Efficiency of Fouled in $1,000,000m^3/day$ Sea Water Reverse Osmosis Membrane Plant

해수용 역삼투막을 이용한 $1,000,000m^3/day$ 규모의 플랜트에서 오염된 막의 화학세정 효율 평가

  • 박준영 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김지훈 (포스코건설 물환경사업본부) ;
  • 정우원 (웅진코웨이) ;
  • 남종우 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김영훈 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 이의종 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 이용수 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 전민정 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김형수 (성균관대학교 건설환경시스템공학과)
  • Published : 2011.06.15

Abstract

Membrane fouling is an unavoidable phenomenon and major obstacle in the economic and efficient operation under sea water reverse osmosis (SWRO). When fouling occurs on the membrane surface, the permeate quantity and quality decrease, the trans-membrane pressure (TMP) and operation costs increase, and the membrane may be damaged. Therefore, chemical cleaning process is important to prevent permeate flow from decreasing in RO membrane filtration process. This study focused on proper chemical cleaning condition for Shuaibah RO plant in Saudi Arabia. Several chemical agents were used for chemical cleaning at different contact time and concentrations of chemicals. Also autopsy analysis was performed using LOI, FT-IR, FEEM, SEM and EDX for assessment of fouling. Specially, FEEM analysis method was thought as analyzing and evaluating tool available for selection of the first applied chemical cleaning dose to predict potential organic fouling. Also, cleaning time should be considered by the condition of RO membrane process since the cleaning time depends on the membrane fouling rate. If the fouling exceeds chemical cleaning guideline, to perfectly remove the fouling, certainly, the chemical cleaning is increased with membrane fouling rate influenced by raw water properties, pre-treatment condition and the point of the chemical cleaning operation time. Also choice of cleaning chemicals applied firstly is important.

Keywords

References

  1. 손진식, 양정석, 박진서 2009 국내 해수담수화 플랜트 활성화 방안 연구, 상하수도학회지, 23, pp251-255
  2. Kim, S. and Hoek, E.M.V (2007) Interactions controlling biopolymer fouling of reverse osmosis membranes, Desalination, 202, pp333-342 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.12.072
  3. Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A. and Booksh K. (2003) Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix Regional Integration to Quantify Spectra for Dissolved Organic Matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, pp.5701-5710 https://doi.org/10.1021/es034354c
  4. Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B. and Moulin, P. (2009) Reverse osmosis desalination : Water sources, technology and today's challenges, Water Res., 43, 2317-2348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.03.010
  5. Poele., S. and Graaf, J. (2005) Enzymatic cleaning in ultrafiltration of wastewater treatment plant effluent, Desalination, 179, pp.13-81
  6. Saeed, M. O. (2000) Biofouling in a seawater reverse osmosis plant on the Red Sea coast, Saudi Arabia, Desalination, 128, 177-190 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(00)00032-1