Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on impact of cognitive complexity and coping flexibility of the counselor on the countertransference management ability

상담자의 인지 복합성과 대처 유연성이 역전이 관리능력에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2010.11.18
  • Accepted : 2011.03.10
  • Published : 2011.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Based on previous studies that cognitive complexity and coping flexibility are closely related with psychological adaptibility, it can be inferred that they can influence management ability of countertransference in counselling. This study focused on the influence of counselor's cognitive complexity and coping flexibility on the management ability of countertransference in counselling. The survey was conducted on 128 (female 108, male 20) counselors of college counseling center, general counseling center, schools and hospitals. The study employed flexibility scale measures, interpersonal discrimination test, and countertransference factors inventory. The results was that the level of cognitive complexity did not influence countertransference ability whereas the level of coping flexibility influenced countertransference management ability. In multiple regression, it was evidenced that coping flexibility influence countertransference management ability more than cognitive complexity. In sum, our study indicate that coping flexibility is important to enhance the management ability of countertransference in counselling, and that related counsellor training program should be developed in the future.

인지 복합성과 대처 유연성은 심리적 적응에 밀접한 관계를 가진다는 기존 연구에 근거한다면 상담의 주요과정인 역전이 관리능력에도 정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있을 것으로 추론할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 상담자의 인지 복합성과 대처 유연성이 역전이 관리능력에 미치는 영향에 대해 알아보았다. 본 연구를 위해 서울 및 수도권 소재의 대학생활 상담소, 상담센터, 학교, 병원 등에 근무하는 상담자 128명(여 108명, 남 20명)을 대상으로 하여 설문조사를 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 상담자의 인지 복합성 수준에 따른 역전이 관리능력에는 차이가 없는 것으로 나타났으나, 상담자의 대처 유연성의 수준에 따라서는 역전이 관리능력에 유의미한 차이가 있었다. 또한 중다회귀에서 역전이 관리능력에 있어서 대처 유연성이 인지 복합성에 비해 보다 많은 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 이는 역전이 관리능력을 함양하기 위한 방안으로 상담자의 대처유연성을 향상시키는 것이 중요함을 시사하며 이에 초점을 둔 상담자 훈련 프로그램 개발이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김완일, "자기 복잡성과 인지적 대처 유연성이 심리적 적응에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 20(3), 715-734, 2008.
  2. 김현주, 김광웅, "아동상담자의 자아탄력성 및 스트레스 대처방식이 역전이 관리능력에 미치는 영향", 놀이치료연구:10(1), 35-46, 2007.
  3. 박기범," Spiro의 인지적 융통성 이론이 사회과 수업과 교재 구성에 주는 시사점", Social Studies Education: 47(1), 157-170, 2008.
  4. 이윤수, 김광웅, "놀이치료자의 자기 효능감과 역전이 관리능력에 관한 연구", 놀이치료연구: 5(1), 69-80, 2002.
  5. 이해리, "청소년의 역할의 긍정적 적응:대처 유연성의 역할", 석사학위논문, 한양대학교, 2007.
  6. 이훈구, 이수정, 이은정, 박수애, "정서심리학", 서울: 법문사, 2002.
  7. 장세미, "상담자의 특성, 역전이 관리 능력 및 상태 불안의 관계", 석사학위 논문, 카톨릭 대학교, 1999.
  8. 홍숙지, "개인 대처 유연성 척도 개발 및 타당화 연구", 석사 학위논문, 성균관대학교, 2006.
  9. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R.K., "Fundamentals of clinical supervision (3rd ed.)", Pearson Education Inc, 2008.
  10. Bieri, J., "Cognitive complexity-simplicity & predictive behavior", Journal of abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 263-268, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043308
  11. Blanck, G., & Blanck, R., "Egopsychology II: Psychoanalytic developmental psychology", NY: Columbia University, 1979.
  12. Bochner, A., & Kelly, C. W., "Interpersonal communication instruction -theory and practice, a symposium", Interpersonal competence: Rationale, philosophy, and implementation of a conceptual framework, Speech Teacher, 23, 279-301, 1974.
  13. Brenner, C., "On the nature and development of affects: a unified theory", Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 43, 532-556, 1974.
  14. Crockett, W. H., "Cognitive complexity abd impression formation", In B. A. Maher(Ed), Progress in experimental personality research(Vol.2), New York, Academic Press, 47-90, 1965.
  15. Frank, C, "Concept, kinds and conceptual development", MIT Press, 1989.
  16. Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J., "The relationship in counseling and psychotherapy", The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 155-244, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000085132001
  17. Gelso, C. J., & Carter, J., "Components of the psychotherapy relationship: Their interaction and unfolding during treatment", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 296-306, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.41.3.296
  18. Gough, H. G, "Manual for the California Psychological Inventory", Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1987.
  19. Hayes, J. A., & Gelso, C. J., "Effects of therapist-trainees' anxiety and empathy on countertransference behavior", Journal of Clinical Psychology", 47, 284-290, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(199103)47:2<284::AID-JCLP2270470216>3.0.CO;2-N
  20. Hayes, J. A., & Gelso, C. J., "Clinical implication of research on countertransference:Science informing practice", Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(8), 1041-1051, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1072
  21. Hayes, J. A., McCracken, J. E., McClanahan, M. K., Hill, C. E., Harp, J. S., & Carozzoni, P., "Therapist perspectives on countertransference: Qualitative data in search of a theory", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 468-482, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.468
  22. Hershbeger, P., "Self-complexity and health promotion: Promising but premature", Psychological Reports, 66, 1207-1216, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.66.3c.1207
  23. Holloway & Wolleat, "Relationship of Counselor Conceptual Level to Clinical Hypothesis Formation", Journal of Counseling Pshchology, 27(6), 539-545, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.27.6.539
  24. Kelly, G. A.,"The psychology of personal constructs", NY: W.W. Norton $ company, 1955.
  25. Keisler, D. J.,"Therapist countertranference: In search of common themes and empirical referents", Journal of Clinical Psychology/In session, 57, 1053-1063, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.1073
  26. Langs, R. J., "The technique of psychoanalytic psychotherapy", 2, New York:Jason Aronson, 1974.
  27. Lazarus, R .S.,"Emotion and adaption", New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  28. Leary, T., "Interpersonal diagnosis of personality" New York: Island Press, 1957.
  29. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M., & Thweatt, K. S., "Aggressive communication trits and their relationship with the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale", Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 513-541, 1998.
  30. Robbins, S. B., & Jolkovski, M. P., "Managing countertransference feeling: An interactional model using awareness of feeling and theoretical framework", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 276-282, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.3.276
  31. Schroder, H. M., Driver, J. J., & Steufert, S.," Human information processing", New York Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1967.
  32. Shapiro, D.,"Autonomy and rigid character", New York :Basic Books, 1982.
  33. Snyder, M.,"Self-monitoring of expressive behavior", journal of personality and social psychology, 30, 526-537, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039
  34. Spiro, R. J.,"Principles Pluralism for adaptive Flexibility in teaching and learning to read", Reading Researchers in Search of Common Ground, Newark, DE: International Reading Association, 2001.
  35. Streufert, S., & Swezey, R.W., "Complexity, managers and organizations, New York Academic Press, 1986.
  36. Van Wagonger, S. L, Gelso, C. J. Hayes, J. A., & Diemer, R. A., "Countertransference and the reputedly excellent therapist", Psychotherapy, 28, 411-421, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.28.3.411
  37. Watkins, C. E., "Countertransference:Its impact on the counseling situation", Journal of Counseling and Development, 63, 356-359, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1985.tb02718.x
  38. Winnicott, D. W., "Hare in the countertrasference", International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30, 69-74, 1949.