Physical Therapy Korea (한국전문물리치료학회지)

Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy (한국전문물리치료학회)
권호 표지

Correlations Between Maximal Isometric Strength and the Cross-Sectional Area of Lumbrical Muscles in the Hand

  • Jung, Doh-Heon (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Hwee (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Jung (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cynn, Heon-Seock (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University, Dept. of Ergonomic Therapy, The Graduate School of Health and Environment, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2011.09.26
  • Accepted : 2011.10.28
  • Published : 2011.11.19
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The lumbrical muscles contribute to the intrinsic plus position, that is simultaneous metacarpophalangeal (MCP) flexion and interphalangeal (IP) extension. The strength of the lumbrical muscles is necessary for normal hand function. However, there is no objective and efficient method of strength measurement for the lumbrical muscles. In addition, previous studies have not investigated the measurement of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the lumbrical muscles using ultrasonography (US) and the relationship between lumbrical muscle strength in the intrinsic plus position and the CSA. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify the measurement method of the CSA of the lumbrical muscles using US and to examine the relationship between maximal isometric strength and the CSA of lumbrical muscles. Nine healthy males participated in this study. Maximal isometric strength of the second, third, and fourth lumbrical muscles was assessed using a tensiometer in the intrinsic plus position which isolated MCP flexion and IP extension. The CSA of the lumbrical muscles was measured with an US. The US probe was applied on the palmar aspect of the metacarpal head with a transverse view of the hand in resting position. There was no significant difference between maximal isometric strength of the lumbrical muscles, but the fourth lumbrical muscle was stronger than the others. The CSA of the lumbrical muscles was significantly different and the fourth lumbrical muscle was significantly larger than the second lumbrical muscle. There was moderate to good correlation between maximal isometric strength and the CSA of the lumbrical muscles. Therefore, we conclude that maximal isometric strength of the lumbrical muscles was positively correlated to the CSA of the lumbrical muscle in each finger, while the measurement of the CSA of the lumbrical muscles, using US protocol in this study, was useful for measuring the CSA of the lumbrical muscles.

Keywords

References

  1. Akagi R, Takai Y, Kato E, et al. Relationships between muscle strength and indices of muscle cross-sectional area determined during maximal voluntary contraction in middle-aged and elderly individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(4):1528-1562.
  2. Brandsma JW, Schreuders TA, Birke JA, et al. Manual muscle strength testing: Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities for the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J Hand Ther. 1995;8(3) :185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0894-1130(12)80014-7
  3. Buschbacher R. Side-to-side confrontational strength-testing for weakness of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1997;79(3):401-405. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199703000-00013
  4. Caine A, Agthe P, Posch B, et al. Sonography of the soft tissue structures of the canine tarsus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2009;50(3):304-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01539.x
  5. Dons B, Bollerup K, Bonde-Petersen F, et al. The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans. Eur J Appl Occup Physiol. 1979;40(2):95-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00421155
  6. Gosling JA, Harris PF, Humpherson JR, et al. Human Anatomy: Color atlas and textbook. 5th ed. Philadephia. Mosby, 2008.
  7. H ebert JJ, Koppenhaver SL, Magel JS, et al. The relationship of transverse abdominis and lumbar multifidus activation and prognostic factors for clinical success with a stabilization exercise program: A cross-sectional study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):78-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.08.146
  8. Incel NA, Ceceli E, Durukan PB, et al. Grip strength: Effect of hand dominace. Singapore Med J. 2002;43(5):234-237.
  9. Irwin CB, Sesto ME. Reliability and validity of the multiaxis profile dynamometer with younger and older participants. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(3): 281-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2010.02.002
  10. Jones EJ, Bishop PA, Woods AK, et al. Cross-sectional area and muscular strength: A brief review. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):987-994. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200838120-00003
  11. Jung HS, Jung HS. Hand dominance and hand use behaviour reported in a survey of 2437 Koreans. Ergonomics. 2009;52(11):1362-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903067805
  12. Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Fukunaga T. Comparison of muscle cross-sectional area and strength between untrained women and men. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1994;68(2):148-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00244028
  13. Kaplan EB. Functional and Surgical Anatomy of the Hand. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams &
  14. Maeda M, Matsui T. Camptodactyly cased by an abdominal lumbrical muscle. J Hand Surg Br. 1985;10(1):95-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(85)80028-0
  15. Maughan RJ, Watson JS, Weir J. Strength and cross-sectional area of human skeletal muscle. J Physiol. 1983;338:37-49. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014658
  16. Molenaar HM, Selles RW, Schreuders TA, et al. Reliability of hand strength measurements using the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer in children. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(10):1796-1801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.07.018
  17. Moore KL, Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1992;553-635.
  18. Nordin M and Frankel VH. Basic Biomechanics of the Musculoskeletal System. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wukins, 1980.
  19. O'Sullivan C, Meaney J, Boyle G, et al. The validity of rehabilitative ultrasound imaging for measurement of trapezius muscle thickness. Man Ther. 2009;14(5):572-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2008.12.005
  20. Platzer W. Color Atlas of Human Anatomy, Volume 1, Locomotor system. 4th ed. New York, Thieme, 1992:116-133.
  21. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall Inc., 2000. Wilkins, 1953.
  22. Kendall F, McCreary E, Provance P, et al. Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005.
  23. Koh S, Buford WL Jr, Andersen CR, et al. Intrinsic muscle contribution to the metacarpophalangeal joint flxion moment of the middle, ring, and small fingers. J Hand Surg Am. 2006; 31(7):1111-1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.003
  24. Koppenhaver SL, Hebert JJ, Fritz JM, et al. Reliability of rehabilitative ultraound imaging of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90(1);87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.022
  25. Kosin SH, Porter S, Clark P, et al. The contribution of the intrinsic muscles to grip and pinch strength. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(1):64-72. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.1999.jhsu24a0064
  26. Rankin G, Stokes M, Newham DJ. Size and shape of the posterior neck muscles measured by ultrasound imaging: Normal values in males and females of different ages. Man Ther. 2005;10(2):108-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2004.08.004
  27. Raschner C, Platzer HP, Patterson C, et al. An isometric hand tester: Quantifying motor function in the hand. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2010;35(6):486-493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193410363532
  28. Rezasoltani A, Ylinen J, Vihko V. Isometric cervical ex tension force and dimensions of semispinalis capitis muscle. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(3):423-428.
  29. Schreuders TA, Roebroeck ME, Jaquet JB, et al. Measuring the strength of the intrinsic muscles of the hand in patients with ulnar and median nerve injuries: Reliability of the Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer (RIHM). J Hand Surg Am. 2004;29(2):318-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2003.10.024
  30. Schreuders TA, Selles RW, Roebroeck ME, et al. Strength measurements of the intrinsic hand muscles: A review of the development and evaluation of the Rotterdam intrinsic hand myometer. J Hand Ther. 2006;19(4):393-401. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2006.07.024
  31. Thomas DH, Long C, Ladsmeer JM, Biomechanical considerations of lumbricalis behavior in the human finger. J Biomechanics. 1968;1(2):107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(68)90013-4
  32. Wang TG, Jan MH, Lin KH, et al. Assessment of stretching of the iliotibial tract with ober and modified ober tests: An ultrasonographic study. Arch Phs Med Rehabil 2006;87(10):1407-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.06.007
  33. Whittaker JL, Teyhen DS, Elliot JM, et al. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: Understanding the technology and its application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007;37(8):434-449.