DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Nonpoint Sources Runoff Characteristic for the Vineyard Areas

포도밭에 대한 비점오염원 유출특성 해석

  • Yoon, Young-Sam (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Hyeup (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Yu, Jay-Jung (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (Nakdong River Water Environment Research Center, National Institute of Environmental Research)
  • 윤영삼 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 이상협 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 유재정 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소) ;
  • 이재관 (국립환경과학원 낙동강물환경연구소)
  • Received : 2010.10.18
  • Accepted : 2011.01.21
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the characteristics of stormwater runoff by rainfall type in orchard areas for two years. Effluents were monitored to calculate the EMCs and runoff loads of each pollutant. The runoff characteristics for nonpoint sources from vineyards were also inspected based on independent variables that affect runoff such as rainfall and rainfall intensity. The average runoff loads of each pollutant from vineyard_A and vineyard_B were found as follows: BOD 39.13 mg/$m^2$, COD 112.13 mg/$m^2$, TOC 54.98 mg/$m^2$, SS 1,681.8 mg/$m^2$, TN 18.29 mg/$m^2$, and TP 4.06 mg/$m^2$, which indicates that the COD's runoff load was especially high. The average EMCs from vineyard_A and vineyard_B, which represents the quality of rainfall effluent, were also analyzed: BOD 3.5 mg/L, COD 11.5 mg/L, TOC 5.2 mg/L, SS 211.7 mg/L, TN 1.774 mg/L, and TP 0.324 mg/L. This suggested that the COD, as an indicator of organic pollutants, is high in terms of EMCs as well. As rainfall increased, the EMCs of BOD, COD, TOC and SS kept turning upward. At a point, however, the high rainfall brought about dilution effects and began to push down the EMCs. Higher rainfall intensities led to the increase in the EMCs that displays the convergence of rainfall. Low rainfall intensities also raised pollutant concentrations, although the concentrations themselves were slightly different among pollutants.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경연구원, 1997, 하천.호수의 수질보전과 유역관리에 관한 한.일 공동세미나.
  2. 김성수, 김종석, 방기연, 권은미, 정욱진, 2002, 경안천 유역의 강우사상별 비점오염원 유출특성 및 원단위 조사, 대한환경공학회지, 24(11), 2019-2027.
  3. 양해근, 2006, 강우시 비점오염물질의 유출 특성에 관한 연구 -곡성천 상하류를 대상으로-, 대한지리학회지, 41(4), 418-434.
  4. 윤영삼, 권헌각, 이윤정, 유재정, 이춘식, 이재관, 2010, 도로 유형별 비점오염원 유출특성 분석, Journal of the Environmental Sciences, 19(11), 1315-1322. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.11.1315
  5. 윤영삼, 권헌각, 이윤정, 유재정, 이재관, 2010, 포도밭에 대한 비점오염물질 유출량 추정 모델식개발, Journal of the Environmental Sciences, 19(11), 1315-1322. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.11.1315
  6. 이병수, 정용준, 박무종, 길경의, 2008, 경안천 유역 농촌지역의 비점오염원 배출 특성에 관한 연구, Journal of Korean Society on Water Quality, 24(2), 169-173.
  7. 이현동, 배철호, 2002, 비점오염원 유출특성과 저감을 위한 최적관리방안, 한국물환경학회, 18(6), 569-576.
  8. 정종배, 김민경, 김복진, 2000, 복숭아 과수원에서 측정된 강우에 의한 질소와 인의 지표면 유실, 한국농화학회지, 43(2), 124-129.
  9. Boesch, D. F., Brinsfield, R. B., Magnien, R. E., 2000, Chesapeake bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture, J. Enviro. Qual., 30(2), 303-320.
  10. Novotny, V., 1995, Nonpoint pollution and urban stormwater management, TECHNOMIC Publ. Co., Lancaster, PA.