DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Gypsum Application on Reducing Methane (CH4) Emission in a Reclaimed Coastal Paddy Soil

간척지 논 토양 개량제로서 석고처리가 메탄 배출량 저감에 미치는 영향

  • Lim, Chang-Hyun (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Yoon (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Pil-Joo (Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Gyeongsang National University)
  • 임창현 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 (BK 21 program)) ;
  • 김상윤 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 (BK 21 program)) ;
  • 김필주 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부 (BK 21 program))
  • Received : 2011.06.23
  • Accepted : 2011.09.09
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gypsum($CaSO_4{\cdot}2H_2O$) is known as an ideal amendment to improve soil quality of the reclaimed coastal land. Since gypsum has very high concentration of electron acceptor like ${SO_4}^{2-}$, its application might be effective on reducing $CH_4$ emission during rice cultivation, but its effect has not been studied well. METHODS AND RESULTS: The effect of gypsum on $CH_4$ emission and rice growth characteristics was studied by pot test, which was packed by reclaimed paddy soils collected from Galsa, Hadong, Gyeongnam province. Chemical-grade gypsum was applied in two soils having EC 2.25 and 9.48 dS/m at rates of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%(wt/wt). $CH_4$ emission was characterized a week interval by closed chamber method during rice cultivation. $CH_4$ emission rate was significantly decreased with increasing salt accumulation and gypsum application levels. With increasing gypsum application, dissolved ${SO_4}^{2-}$ concentration in the leachate water was significantly increased, which might have suppressed $CH_4$ production in soil. Total $CH_4$ flux was dramatically decreased with increasing gypsum application. In contrast, rice yield was increased with increasing gypsum application and then achieved maximum productivity at 1.0% gypsum application in two soils. CONCLUSION(s): Gypsum is a very good soil amendment to suppress $CH_4$ emission in reclaimed coastal paddy soils, and improve rice productivity and soil properties. The optimum application level of gypsum is assumed at ca. 1% to improve soil productivity with reducing effectively $CH_4$ emission during rice cultivation.

간척지 논 토양에서 석고의 처리는 염의 농도에 관계없이 고염도와 저염도 전체 토양에서 무처리 대비 71.3~98.9%까지 메탄 발생을 저감 할 수 있었다. 석고 처리에 따른 황산염을 증가는 전자수용체, 즉 황산염이온의 양 증대에 따른 전자의 활성저하와 황환원균의 활성증가가 메탄 발생을 저감시키는 가장 큰 요인인 것으로 판단된다. 간척지 논에 석고를 시용할 경우 부족한 칼슘의 공급효과를 통하여 토양의 물리성 및 배수 개선을 통하여 메탄 발생 감소에 영향을 줄 수 있었다. 또한 석고의 시용은 간척지 토양의 높은 pH와 높은 나트륨 이온을 효과적으로 저감할 수 있어 식물 생육 및 수량에 긍정적인 영향을 주었으며, 물리성 개선을 통하여 메탄 발생을 저감 시킬 수 있었다. 간척지 토양에서 석고의 시용은 벼 수량을 13.2~39.1%까지 증수 효과가 있었으나, 과량 처리시 오히려 생산성을 감소시켰다. 결론적으로 간척지에서 토양 개량을 위해 사용되어 지는 석고는 토양의 물리 화학성을 개선할 뿐만 아니라 메탄 발생을 효과적으로 저감할 수 있는 우수한 토양 개량제로서 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, M.A., Lee, C.H., Kim, P.J., 2008. Effect of silicate fertilizer on reducing methane emission during rice cultivation. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 44, 597-604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-007-0243-5
  2. Blake, D.R., Rowland, F.S., 1988. Continuing worldwide increase in tropospheric methane. Science. 239, 1129-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.239.4844.1129
  3. Bronson, K.F., Mosier, A.R., 1991. Effect of encapsulated calcium carbide on dinitrogen, nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide emissions from flooded rice. Biol. Fert. Soils. 11, 116-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336375
  4. Denier Van der Gon, H.A.C., Neue, H.U., 1994. Impact of gypsum application on the methane emission from a wetland rice field. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. 8, 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1029/94GB00386
  5. Dickinson, R.E., Cicerone, R.J., 1986. Future global warming from atmospheric trace gases. Nature. 319, 109-114. https://doi.org/10.1038/319109a0
  6. Garica, J.L., Patel B.K.C., Ollivier, B., 2000. Taxonomic, phylogenetic and ecological diversity of methanogenic archaea. Anaerobe. 6, 205-226. https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2000.0345
  7. Hori, K., Inubushi, K., Matsumoto, S., Wada, H., 1990. Competition for acetic acid between methane formation and sulfate reduction in paddy soil. Jpn. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 61, 572-578.
  8. Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A., Varney, S.K., 1992. Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change (IPCC): Climate change. The supplementary report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, pp. 1-200, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)., 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.
  10. IRRI(International Rice Research Institute)., 2009. Trends In the Rice Economy: Harvested area of rough rice, by country and geographical region-USDA.
  11. Jung, Y.S., Ryu, C.H., 2005. Soil problems and agricultural management of the reclaimed land. Korean Journal of Crop Science 60, 8-20.
  12. Lindau, C.W., Alford, D.P., Bollich, P.K., Linscombe, S.D., 1993. Inhibition of methane evolution by calcium sulfate addition to flooded rice. Plant and Soil. 158, 299-301.
  13. Marzzacco, C.J., 1998. The Effects of Salts and Nonelectrolytes on the Solubility of Potassium Bitartrate: An Introductory Chemistry Discovery Experiment. J. Chem. Educ. 75, 1628. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p1628
  14. Minami, K., Neue, H.U., 1994. Rice paddies as a methane source. Climate change. 27, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098470
  15. Ranjan, M., Animita, B., Ujjanini, S., Bijay, K.D., Alak, K.M., 2009. Role of Alternative Electron Acceptors (AEA) to control methane flux from waterlogged paddy fields: Case studies in the southern part of West Bengal, India. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. 3, 664-672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.05.004
  16. Rodhe, H., 1990. Comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science. 248, 1217-1219. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.248.4960.1217
  17. Rural Development Administration(RDA)., 1988. Methods of Soil Chemical Analysis. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, RDA, Suwon.
  18. Rural Development Administration(RDA)., 1999. Fertilization standard of crop plants. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon. pp. 148.
  19. Rolston, D.E., 1986. Gas flux, In: Klute A, (ed.) Methods of soil analysis, part 1, 2nd ed., Agron. Monogr. 9. Soil Sci Soc America and American Soc Agron. Madison, W1, pp. 1103-1119.
  20. SAS Institute., 1995. System for Windows Release 6.11. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
  21. Singh, S., Singh, J.S., Kashyap, A.K., 1999. Methane flux from irrigated rice fields in relation to crop growth and N-fertilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1219-1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00027-9
  22. Sposito, G., Mattigod, S.V., 1977. On the chemical foundation of the sodium adsorption ratio. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100020030x
  23. Takai, Y., 1961. Reduction and microbial metabolism in paddy soil (3) - in Japanese. Nogyo Gijutsu (Agricultural Technology). 16, 122-126.
  24. Van Breemen, N., Feijtel, T.C.J., 1990. Soil processes and properties involved in the production of greenhouse gases, with special relevance to soil taxonomic systems, In: Bouwan, A.F. (Ed.), Soils and greenhouse effect, Wiley, New York, pp. 195-223.
  25. Yagi, K., Chairoj, P., Tusuruta, H., Cholitkul, W., Minami, K., 1994. Methane emission from rice paddy fields in the central plain of Thailand. Soil Sci. Plant Nutrition, 40, 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1994.10414275

Cited by

  1. Effect of Salt Concentration on Methane Emission in a Coastal Reclaimed Paddy Soil Condition: Pot Test vol.32, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.4.252
  2. Effect of gypsum on exchangeable sodium percentage and electrical conductivity in the Daeho reclaimed tidal land soil in Korea—a field scale study 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1446-x
  3. Effect of By-Product Gypsum Fertilizer on Methane Gas Emissions and Rice Productivity in Paddy Field vol.49, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2016.49.1.030