DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between the liquid-liquid partition method and modified QuEChERS method for the analysis of pesticide residues in beef fat

소지방 중 잔류농약분석을 위한 액-액분배법과 modified QuEChERS법 비교

  • Kim, Yoen-Joo (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Choi, Yoon-Hwa (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Shin, Bang-Woo (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Hark (Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment)
  • 김연주 (서울특별시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 최윤화 (서울특별시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 신방우 (서울특별시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 이정학 (서울특별시 보건환경연구원)
  • Received : 2011.09.23
  • Accepted : 2011.12.21
  • Published : 2011.12.30

Abstract

This article described the comparison of a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) sample preparation and the classical method established by National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service (NVRQS) for the determination of pesticide residues in livestock products using GC-tandem mass spectrometry. The classical method by NVRQS used liquid-liquid partioning followed by evaporizing. The modified QuEChERS entailed extraction of 2 g sample with 15 ml acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid followed by addition of 6 g anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 1.5 g sodium acetate. After centrifugation, 6 ml of the extract underwent a cleanup step (in a technique known as column-based solid phase extraction) using 400 mg each of $C_{18}$ and primary secondary amine sorbents plus 1,200 mg magnesium sulfate. The quantitation of individual pesticides by both methods was based on tissue standard calibration curves with a correlation coefficient in excess of 0.98 for the 24 pesticides. The detection limits by the classical method were ranged 1.3~5.0 ${\mu}g$/kg, with mean recoveries between 76.2% and 114.3% except aldrin (59.3%) and deltamethrin (63.6%). The detection limits by modified QuEChERS were ranged 0.3~6.2 ${\mu}g$/kg, with mean recoveries between 68.0% and 114.3% except dimethipin (152.6%), chlorfenvinphos (138.1%), 4,4-DDT (61.5%), aldrin (60.4%) and chinomethionate (30.3%).

Keywords

References

  1. 국립농업과학원. 2011. 유기오염물질의 신속 분석체계 확립. 2010년도 국립농업과학원 시험연구사업보고서-농산물안전성연구. 34-45.
  2. 김욱희, 박성규, 최영희, 승현정, 한성희, 이영주, 장정임, 김윤희, 조한빈, 박건용, 유인실, 한기영. 2011. 서울지역 유통 농산물 중 내분비계 장애 추정농약의 잔류실태조사. 농약과학회지 15: 36-47.
  3. 농림수산식품부 농업연수원. 2010. 제2기 축산물잔류물질검사과정. pp. 285-296.
  4. 식품의약품안전평가원. 2009. 식품공전 잔류농약 분석법 실무 해설서. pp. 22-24
  5. 정영호, 김장억, 김정한, 이영득, 임치환, 허장현. 2004. 최신농약학. 시그마프레스, 서울.
  6. 홍인석, 최윤화, 권택부, 이정학. 2005. Gas chromatograph-mass selective detector를 이용한 식육 중 잔류농약의 동시 분석. 한국가축위생학회지 28: 285-294.
  7. Anastassiades M, Lehotay SJ, Stajnbaher D, Schenck FJ. 2003. Fast and easy multiresidue method employing acetonitrile extraction/partitioning and "dispersive solid-phase extraction" for the determination of pesticide residues in produce. J AOAC Int 86: 412-431.
  8. Beyer A, Biziuk M. 2008. Methods for determining pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in food samples-Problems and challenges. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 48: 888-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390701761878
  9. Castillo M, Gonzalez C, Miralles A. 2011. An evaluation method for determination of non-polar pesticide residues in animal fat samples by using dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up and GC-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 400: 1315-1328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-011-4656-5
  10. Jones KC, Voogt P. 1999. Persistent organic pollutants (POPs): state of the science. Environ Pollut 100: 209-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00098-6
  11. ICH. 1996. Q2B validation of analytical procedures: Methodogy http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Regulator%20y-Information/Guidances/UCM128049.pdf
  12. LeDoux M. 2011. Analytical methods applied to the determination of pesticide residues in foods of animal origin. A review of the past two decades. J Chromatogr A 1218: 1021-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.097
  13. Lehotay SJ, Mastovska K, Yun SJ. 2005. Evaluation of two fast and easy methods for pesticide residue analysis in fatty food matirixes. J AOAC Int 88: 630-638.
  14. Lehotay SJ. 2007. Determination of pesticide residues in foods by acetonitrile extraction and partitioning with magnesium sulfate: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 90: 485-520.
  15. Park JY, Choi JH, Abd El-Aty AM, Kim BM, Oh JH, Do JA, Kwon KS, Shim KH, Choi OJ, Shin SC, Shim JH. 2011. Simultaneous multiresidue analysis of 41 pesticide residues in cooked foodstuff using QuEChERS: comparison with classical method. Food Chem 128: 241-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.065
  16. Paya P, Anastassiades M, Mack D, Sigalova I, Tasdelen B, Oliva J, Barba A. 2007. Analysis of pesticide residues using the Quick Easy Cheap Effective Rugged and Safe (QuEChERS) pesticide multiresidue method in combination with gas and liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometric detection. Anal Bioanal Chem 389: 1697-1714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1610-7
  17. Rosenblum L, Hieber T, Morgan J. 2001. Determination of pesticides in composite dietary samples by gas chromatography/ mass spectrometry in the selected ion monitoring mode by using a temperature-programmable large volume injector with preseparation column. J AOAC Int 84: 891-900.
  18. Stefanelli P, Santilio A, Cataldi L, Dommarco R. 2009. Multiresidue analysis of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides in ground beef meat by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Environ Sci Health B 44: 350-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230902801000
  19. Schenck FJ, Lehotay SJ. 2000. Does further clean-up reduce the matrix enhancement effect in gas chromatographic analysis of pesticide residues in food? J Chromatogr A 868: 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(99)01137-1
  20. Wilkowska A, Biziuk M. 2011. Determination of pesticide residues in food matrices using the QuEChERS methodology. Food Chem 125: 803-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.094

Cited by

  1. 축산물 중 살균제 Chinomethionat의 개별 잔류분석법 확립 vol.40, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5338/kjea.2021.40.2.16