INTRODUCTION
Malaria is an endemic infectious disease in the world. Every year about 300-500 million people are infected by it and between 1.5-2.7 million infected people die from which most of them are children.1 Maximum deaths are caused by the most aggressive species falciparum having rapid rate of asexual reproduction that can progress rapidly to severe malaria like cerebral malaria. New nonalkaloidal antimalarial drugs artemisinin and its derivatives have become increasingly important in consequence of the fast developing resistance of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum to currently used alkaloidal drugs such as quinine and chloroquine. Artemisinin (Fig. 1), discovered by Chinese scientists in 1970 and originally isolated from the herb of the Chinese medicinal plant Artemisia annua,2 or Qing Hao, is a potent antimalarial drug against the resistant strains of P. falciparum.3 Clinical studies showed that artemisinin is an exceptional antimalarial agent with negligible toxicity and high efficacy against all forms of the parasites, including P. falciparum. 4
Fig. 1.Chemical structure of Artemisinin.
In 340 AD, Artemisia annua was recorded first as the treatment of fever in a medicinal book, “Zhou Hou Bei Ji Fang” (Handbook of Prescriptions for Emergency Treatment). A. annua seems to be the unique natural source of artemisinin. Other species of Artemisia have been examined but none of them contain artemisinin.3 The plant is widely used in traditional herbal medicine in the countries of South East Asia. Herba Artemisiae Annuae or Qing Hao is contained in the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China. This plant is commonly used in China with a long history of use (for over 1000 years) as an antipyretic to treat alternate chill and fever symptoms of malaria and other “heat syndromes” in the traditional Chinese medical systems.5-6 Traditionally the plant is used to prepare a drink as indicated in the compendium of treatments (Ben Cao Gang Mu), written in 1596 AD by Shizhen: “take a handful of qinghao, soak it in a sheng (liter) of water, and squeeze out the juice and drink it all.”7-8
Artemisinin production in the A. annua varies with plant components, time from vegetative phase to full flowering, strain origin concerning plant profile etc which is usually in the range of 0.01% to 0.4% but some hybrids produce over 1%.9,10 1.4% artemisinin (dry weight) can be obtained from hybrid plant called “Artemis” which has been developed for commercial artemisinin production.10 Analysis of artemisin in the traditional herbal tea preparations of A. annua is a challenging issue because the compound is thermolabile, the concentration of artemisinin in the plant is low and the intact molecule stains poorly. Moreover it is sensitive to acid base treatment and other compounds in the plant also interfere in its detection. Until now, various methods have been reported for the determination of artemisinin in the plant such as thin-layer chromatography,11 HPLC with various detection system (UV, EC, ELSD, RI, DAD,12-18 reversed-phase HPLC,19 a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) method,20 GC method with FID,16,21 combined gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method.22
However, artemisinin and its derivatives contain an endoperoxy bridge (-O-O-) which is electrochemically active and can be therefore reduced at different electrodes. 23,24 In order to develop an analytical method for antimalarial endoperoxides, polarography is preferred because it is selective, well reproducible and durable. Furthermore it is not necessary to separate auxiliary materials with the result to be not time consuming and economical. In our previous report we have developed a method to estimate artemisinin in crude plants using differential pulse polarography (DPP) method.25 As our continuous effort we have applied this method to analyse artemisinin in traditional herbal tea preparation of Artemisia annua. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the different ways of tea preparations to optimize the artemisinin in the tea solution by analyzing with the developed method of differential pulse polarography. As a result the population in isolated areas will be benefited by making teas or decoctions from the plant materials using appropriate methods of tea preparation to achieve a positive outcome against malaria.
EXPERIMENTAL
Apparatus, plant materials and chemicals
The polarographic investigations were carried out with a polarographic analyzer/stripping voltammeter model 264 A (EG&G, PARC, New Jersey, USA) in combination with a polarographic stand model 303 A SMDE (EG&G) and plotter model RE0150 (EG&G). This electrode stand consists of a dropping mercury electrode (DME) as working electrode, an Ag/AgCl (3M KCl) reference electrode and a platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode. The pH values of the solutions were adjusted employing a Metrohm pH meter Model 632 and a glass electrode model 6.0202.000 (Metrohm AG, Herisau, Switzerland). All measurements were carried out at room temperature. Hot plate/a domestic microwave oven and as a plant “Artemis” a hybrid plants were used for tea preparation. The plant was provided with as gift from Professor Heide of Tübingen University of Germany. Artemisinin (pure substance, 98%) was obtained from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). All reagents and solvents were of Suprapur and/or Proanalysis grade (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Distilled water was purified with a Milli-Q Nanopure® (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) system and was stored in Nalgene® containers. The nitrogen used was 99.9995% pure, while the mercury was 99.999% pure (Oegussa, Graz, Austria). (NH4)2SO4 (0.05 M) pH 4-8, KH2PO4 (0.1 M) pH 4-7, acetic acid/sodium acetate buffer (0.1 M) pH 3.5-5.5 and Britton Robinson buffer solutions (0.1 M) pH 2-10 were used as supporting electrolytes for fundamental polarographic tests. The proper pH value was adjusted with the addition of 0.5 M NaOH to the buffer solutions mentioned above. The construction of the calibration curve and the analysis of artemisinin in the herbal tea preparation were performed in a phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) mixed with methanol (7:3; v/v). This methanolic buffer solution has a pH value of 6.4. The aqueous buffer solution can be used for two weeks but the mixture with methanol was prepared freshly just before determination. Stock solution of artemisinin was prepared by transferring 15.3 mg artemisinin to a 50 mL volumetric flask, dissolving in methanol and bringing to volume. This solution contains 0.30 mg/mL of artemisinin and is stable for two weeks. Further standard artemisinin solutions were prepared freshly by diluting the stock solution with methanol.
Instrumental parameters for DPP and CV
For preparation of the calibration curve and analysis of the artemisinin in the tea, the analyser was operated under following parameters: Method: DPP; Drop size: M; Drop time: 1s; Potential range: +0.15 to -0.45 V; Scan rate: 5 mV/s; Pulse amplitude: 50 mV; Current sensitivity: 1-2 μA. The following apparatus parameters were set for cyclic voltammetric analysis: Drop size: M; Potential range: +0.15 to -0.35 V; Scan rate: 10-500 mV/s; Current sensitivity: 1 μA and Equilibration time: 15 s.
General procedure for DPP and CV measurements
10 mL of the appropriate buffer were transferred into the polarographic cell. After purging 8 min with nitrogen for deoxygenation, the blank solution was determined by using the above-mentioned instrumental parameters. Then a volume of 60 μL of the stock solution of artemisinin (0.3 mg/mL) for DPP and/or 250 μL for CV was added and then nitrogen was passed for another 30 s. The polarogramm and/or cyclic voltammogram was recorded and evaluated.
Optimisation of DPP method for the determination of artemisinin
Optimisation was carried out as our previous article.23,25 For artemisinin, among different buffer systems phosphate buffer of pH 5.5-6 was the best, for this phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) with methanol and ethanol in different ratios were also tested. Polarographic analysis was carried out as described above.
Method validation
The method was validated according to ICH Guidelines Q2A and Q2B.
Calibration curves including linearity, range, LOQ and LOD: 10 mL of the mixture of phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and methanol (7:3; v/v) were transferred to a polarographic cell and deoxygenated by purging 8 min with nitrogen. After determining the blank value, 6 aliquots (each 50 μL) of artemisinin stock solution were added successively and the cell was purged after each addition with nitrogen for another 30 sec. The polarogram was then recorded using the instrumental parameters described above. The data were evaluated by applying the tangent method, correlating for the increase in volume. Using suitable standard solutions it is possible to determine artemisinin in the concentration range of 0.18 - 9.00 μg/mL by using proper standard solutions.25 The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were calculated according to the Analytical Methods Committee.26 LOD is defined as the mean value of the intercepts (blank mean yB) of the calibration curves plus three times of the standard deviation of the intercepts (blank SB). LOQ is estimated similarly to the LOD value, but: yB + 10 SB.
Preparation of Tea
Method A: 100 g of boiling distilled water was added to 0.5 g of dried herb. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, weighed and then the plant material was removed by filtration.
Method B: 100 g of boiling distilled water was added to 0.5 g of dried herb. After addition of the boiling water, the mixture was briefly stirred for 5 min. Then the container was covered for 10 minutes, weighed and subsequently the plant material was removed by filtration.
Method C: 100 g of boiling distilled water was added to 0.5 g of dried herb. The mixture was boiled for 5 to 30 minutes. After cooling to room temperature, weighed and the plant material was removed by filtration.
Method D: 100 g of boiling distilled water was added to 0.5 g of dried herb. The mixture was kept in microwave oven (1 to 3.5 min) at 750 W. Then the container was covered for 10 minutes, weighed and subsequently the plant material was removed by filtration.
Using water and 5% ethanol as solvents
Following method C normal water, distilled water, nanopure and 5% ethanol was used as solvent for tea preparation. In the case of normal water, distilled water and nanopure 100 g of water was added to the 0.5 g of dried herb. For 5% ethanol as solvent, 4 grams of ethanol (about 5 mL) was added first to 0.5 g of dried herb (Artemis) and then 96.0 g of boiling water was added to the mixture.
Extraction of artemisinin from tea preparation
50 g tea was divided into 3 portions. Each portion was extracted twice with petroleum ether at 40-60 ℃ (1:1 ratio). The organic phases of 3 portions were dried with sodium sulphate and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was dissolved in 6 mL of 50% methanol and filtered with 0.45 μm filter in order to get a clear solution for analysis.
Analysis of artemisinin from tea extract
10 mL of a mixture of phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and methanol (7:3; v/v) were transferred to the polarographic cell and purged with nitrogen for 8 min. After determination of the blank value, 50 μL of the tea extract (mean linearity range) was added and purged with nitrogen for another 30 sec. The polarogram was then recorded using the instrumental parameters described above. The content of artemisinin was determined applying the standard addition method by adding 50 μL stock solution three times (15 μg artemisinin/50 μL). The peak height was evaluated using the tangent method.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The development of a DPP method for analysis of artemisinin and validation
Fig. 2 illustrates a typical cyclic voltammogram of artemisinin in phosphate buffer of 5.5 that exhibited a very distinct cathodic peak at a potential of -0.05 V vs Ag/AgCl and no anodic signal which indicates that the electrode reaction is irreversible. A differential pulse polarographic method was developed as this method was selected as one of most sensitive method among the electrochemical procedure. The method was optimized, the peak current of artemisinin was observed optimum using a mixture of phosphate buffer of pH 5.5 and methanol (7:3, v/v). The optimised DPP method for the determination of artemisinin was validated following ICH Guidelines Q2A and Q2B concerning linearity, LOQ, LOD, precision, specificity, recovery studies and robustness. After validation this method was applied to the analysis of artemisinin in the traditional herbal tea preparation.
Fig. 2.Cyclic voltammogram of 2.6×10-5 M artemisinin in a phosphate buffer of pH 5.5. Scan rate 100 mV/s. A dashed line shows the supporting electrolyte.
Estimation of artemisinin in tea preparations
Artemisinin content in A. annua L “Artemis”: The artemisinin content of the dried plant material of A. annua “Artemis” was determined as 1.4%, using extraction with petroleum ether and employing DPP method.25
Extraction of artemisinin from tea and analysis: The current Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China officially lists the dried herb of A. annua as a remedy for fever and malaria. The daily dose is specified as 4.5 to 9 grams of dried herb to be prepared as a tea infusion with boiling water. Artemisinin itself is poorly soluble in water, presence of other plant constituents with amphiphilic properties (e.g., flavonoids or saponins) might be helpful for solubilisation. The tea preparation was done on the basis of dosage recommendations of the current pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China (5 g herbal drug in 1L/day for five days). According to this guideline 100 mL of tea was prepared from 0.5 g of herbal drug using boiling water and this hot water extract was applied directly to the cell for the analysis of artemisinin by DPP method and the polarogram is presented in Fig. 3. The optimised condition (phosphate buffer: methanol = 7:3; v/v) has been used in order to analyze artemisinin in tea preparation. The peak current was not good reproducible as the concentration of artemisinin is low in the tea. For this reason, it was necessary to extract artemisinin by an organic solvent from tea. Several solvents have been used for optimising extraction step and among these solvents petroleum ether (40-60 ℃) was the most selective one and therefore it was considered to be the solvent of choice for extraction of artemisinin from the tea preparation. Using petroleum ether the extraction procedure was also optimised and the best result was obtained when the herbal tea was extracted twice with petrol ether by following petroleum ether/tea ratio 1:1. After extraction by petroleum ether the organic phase was collected and evaporated at reduced pressure; the residue was dissolved in 50% methanol in water (v/v) that was optimised. Standard addition method was used for the determination of artemisinin in the tea of A. annua plant.
Fig. 3.Differential pulse polarogram of artemisinin in the tea preparation (hot water extraction) without extraction by petroleum ether.
After determining the blank value, 50 μL of the methanolic plant extract (mean linearity range) was added and purged with nitrogen for another 30s. The polarogram was then recorded and evaluated using the tangent method. The content of artemisinin was determined by applying the standard addition method with the addition of 3×50 μL stock solution as shown in Fig. 4. This figure shows that there is no interfering component present in the tea extract between this measuring potential ranges which is particularly suitable for the analysis of artemisinin in tea.
Fig. 4.Determination of artemisinin in tea extraction (method B) using phosphate buffer of pH 5.5/methanol solution (7:3 v/v). Differential pulse polarograms of (a) blank, (b) 50 μL tea extraction and (c-e) addition of artemisinin stock solution, 50 μL each.
Artemisinin concentration in different herbal tea preparations: In this study, tea preparations of the Chinese traditional medicinal plant A. annua L in different ways in order to have the maximum extraction efficiency were investigated and the concentration of artemisinin was determined in the tea preparations by the developed DPP method. Four different methods (infusion and decoction) with different times of tea preparations were studied. In method A, after adding boiling water the mixture was left to cool to room temperature and then plant material was removed by filtration. In method B, after adding boiling water the mixture was briefly stirred and covered the container for 10 minutes. In the case of infusions (without further boiling) the highest content of artemisinin was extracted from method B with 84.7% where as from method A with 81% (Table 1).
In the case of decoction (method C), it is observed that there exists a great difference in content of artemisinin from cooking 5 minutes and 30 minutes. Artemisinin is known to be thermally unstable compound and Table 1 shows that tea prepared by adding boiling water to the leaves without further heating yields higher artemisinin concentration than if the leaves are boiled for more than 5 minutes (Method C). Extended boiling (30 minutes) reduced the yield of artemisinin probably owing to the known chemical lability of artemisinin that was also observed by Professor Heide and co-workers.12 In method D cooking in domestic microwave oven with varying times up to five minutes was used and the results were compared. Same results as method C were obtained in method D i.e. artemisinin concentration decreases with cooking times (Table 1). No great differences were observed between method D (using microwave oven not more than 1.5 min) and method B. Microwave oven can also represent an alternative method to extract artemisinin from A. annua. In addition the investigations were also carried out using different types of water (normal, distilled and nanopure water) and 5% ethanol in distilled water as solvents of tea preparations. Different contents of artemisinin was found in the tested extracts, as reported in Table 2 concerning the percentage of artemisinin in the water and 5% ethanol extracts. It has been appeared that artemisinin could be extracted up to 89% by using 5% ethanol as solvent of tea preparation and only 62% of the total artemisinin using nanopure water. There is no significant difference between distilled or normal water as media for tea preparations. However, 5% ethanol extract showed a high power of extraction for artemisinin of A. annua if compared with infusions and decoctions.
Table 1.n = 6
Table 2.Analysis of artemisinin from tea (tea preparation using different solvents)
CONCLUSION
The developed DPP method can be applied straightforwardly to analyze artemisinin content in herbal tea preparation without using any special separation technique and any molecular breakdown or derivatization of artemisinin. Moreover no intervention was observed in the range of potential window used in the developed method to estimate artemisinin. The developed method is not so expensive and time consuming. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D) below 4% indicates an excellent reproducibility of the method. To get the optimum therapeutic effect against malaria from the herbal tea of A. annua, the suggested best solvent for tea preparation is 5% ethanol in distilled water and following the method B (without further cooking after the addition of boiled solvent with stirring).
References
- World Health Organization 1996. The World Health report-Fighting disease, Fostering Development, WHO: Geneva, Switzerland.
- Klayman, D. L.; Lin, A. J.; Acton N.; Scovill, J. P.; Hoch J. M.; Milhous, W. K.; Theoharides, A. D. J. Nat. Prod. 1984, 47, 715. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50034a027
- Klayman, D. L.; Science 1985, 228, 1049. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3887571
- Anon. China Pharmaceutical Bulletin 1979, 2, 49.
- Charles, D. J.; Cebert, E.; Simon, J. E. J. Ess. Oil Res. 1991, 3, 33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10412905.1991.9697903
- Anon. Lancet 1992, 339, 649. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)90800-I
- Dhingra, V.; Rao, K. V.; Narasu, M. L. Life sciences 2000, 66, 279.
- Li, Y.; Wu, Y. L. Medecine Tropicale 1996, 58, 9.
- Delabays, N.; Benakis, A.; Collet, G. Hort. 1993, 330, 203.
- Delabays, N.; Simonnet, X.; Gaudin, M. Curr. Med. Chem. 2001, 8, 1795. https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867013371635
- Marchand, E.; Atemnkeng, M. A.; Vanermen, S.; Vercammen1 J. P. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2008, 22, 454. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.953
- Raeth, K.; Taxis, K.; Walz, G.; Gleiter, C. H.; Li, S. M.; Heide, L. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2004, 70, 128.
- Zhang, R. S.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, M. Linchan Huaxue Yu Gongye 2009, 9, 115.
- Vandenberghe, D. R.; Vergauwe, A. N.; Montagu, M. V.; Vandeneckhout, E. G. J. Nat. Prod 1995, 58, 798. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50119a027
- Liu, C. Z.; Zhou, H. Y.; Zhao, Y. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 581, 298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.08.038
- Congyue, A. P.; Jorge, F. S.; Ferreira, A. J. W. J. Chromatog. A 2006, 1133, 254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2006.08.043
- Celeghini, R. M. S.; Sousa, I. M. O.; Silva, A. P.; Rodrigues, R A. F.; Foglio, M. A. Quimica Nova 2009, 32, 875. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422009000400009
- Bilia, A. R.; Malgalhaes M. P.; Bergonzi, M. C.; Vincieri, F.F. Phytomed. 2006, 13, 487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2006.01.008
- Qian, G.-P.; Yang, Y.-W.; Ren, Q.L. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Related Technol. 2005, 28, 705. https://doi.org/10.1081/JLC-200048890
- Wang, M.; Park, C. H.; Wu, Q.; Simon, J. E. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 7010. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051061p
- Sipahimalani, A. T.; Fulzele, D. P.; Heble, M. R. J. Chromatogr. 1991, 538, 452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88868-3
- Ranasinghe, A.; Sweatlock, J. D.; CooKs, R. G. J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 552. https://doi.org/10.1021/np50094a016
- Debnath, C.; Haslinger, E.; Likussar, W.; Ortner, A. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2006, 41, 638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2005.12.003
- Zhou, Z. J.; Yang, P. H.; Feng, D. X.; Zhu, Y. T.; Zhang, M. Y. Yunnan Daxue Xuebao 2003, 25, 144.
- Debnath, C.; Haslinger, E.; Ortner, A. NPC 2006, 1, 487.
- Analytical Methods Committee. Analyst 1987, 112, 199. https://doi.org/10.1039/an9871200199
Cited by
- Research progress in electroanalytical techniques for determination of antimalarial drugs in pharmaceutical and biological samples vol.6, pp.62, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA05025E
- The complexity of medicinal plants: The traditional Artemisia annua formulation, current status and future perspectives vol.150, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2013.08.021