INTRODUCTION
Carbon nanotubes were discovered in 1991 by Iijima of NEC Corporation.1 Then, efforts in synthesis, characterization and theoretical investigation on nanotubes has grown, rapidly. In 1993, the simplest kind of carbon nanotubes, single walled carbon nanotubes, SWNTs, were discovered independently by Iijima group2 and Bethune IBM team.3 Thess and coworkers4 later produced carbon nanotubes with 100 to 500 SWNTs bundled into a 2-D triangular lattice. Classical molecular mechanics (MM), lattice dynamics (LD), molecular dynamics (MD), tight binding and ab initio level Quantum Mechanical (QM) methods5-22 are used for theoretical calculation. Also, Density functional theory (DFT) is one of the methods is used in theoretical calculation successfully. In this paper, we present a detailed study of the energetic, structures, and mechanical properties for zigzag (4, 0) carbon nanotubes. We used an accurate force field, with using of exchange and correlation effect derived through quantum mechanical calculations, DFT, to calculate density charges between the carbon atoms and N-N energy (between nuclear and nuclear)and E-N energy (between nuclear and electrons) and KE (kinetic energy).
Computational details
Here, we have presented the results of a theoretical study by density functional theory (DFT), in this work we have used Gaussian 98 code for our calculations and applied different DFT methods, B3P86, B3PW91, B1B96, BLYP and B3LYP. The basis set in our calculation is 6-31G*. We have shown the effect of exchange and correlation on density charges between the carbon atoms and N-N energy (between nuclear and nuclear) and E-N energy (between nuclear and electrons) and KE (kinetic energy). We selected zigzag (4, 0) carbon nanotubes. This nanotube has some rings and cages.
Gaussian 98 offers a wide variety of Density Functional Theory (DFT).23-26 Energies,27 analytic gradients, and true analytic frequencies28-35 are available for all DFT models. In Hartree-Fock theory, the energy has the form:
Where: V is the nuclear repulsion energy, ρ is the density matrix,
In density functional theory, the exact exchange (HF) for a single determinant is replaced by a more general expression, the exchange-correlation functional, which can include terms accounting for both exchange energy and the electron correlation which is omitted from Hartree-Fock theory:
Where EX [ρ] is the exchange functional, and EC [ρ] is the correlation functional.
Hartree-Fock theory is really a special case of density functional theory, with EX [ρ] given by the exchange integral and EC = 0. The functionals normally used in density functional are integrals of some function of the density and possibly the density gradient:
Where the methods differ in which function f is used for EX and which (if any) f is used for EC. In addition to pure DFT methods, Gaussian 98 supports hybrid methods in which the exchange functional is a linear combination of the Hartree-Fock exchange and a functional integral of the above form.
Proposed functionals lead to integrals which cannot be evaluated in closed form and are solved by numerical quadrature.
There are many correlation functional in DFT. VWN, Vosko, Wilk, and Nusair 1980 correlation functional fitting the RPA solution to the uniform electron gas, often referred to as Local Spin Density (LSD) correlation.36 LYP the correlation functional of Lee, Yang, and Parr, which includes both local and non-local terms.37,38 P86 the gradient corrections of Perdew, along with his 1981 local correlation functional39 and other functionals. In DFT exchange functional combine with correlation functional and create hybrid Functionals, for example B3LYP, BLYP, B3P86, B3PW91, B1B96 and other hybrid functionals.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In this work we have calculated some properties of zigzag carbon nanotube (4, 0) in Fig. 1. The results are summarized in Table 1. Where N-N is the nuclear repulsion energy, E-N is the attraction energy between electrons and nuclear and KE is the kinetic energy.
Table 1.The properties of zigzag carbon nanotube (4, 0), calculated by DFT method with 6-31G*, N-N nuclear repulsion energy, E-N electron and nuclear attraction energy and KE kinetic energy
Some conclusions can be drawn from these results. First, the repulsion energy between nuclears in B3PW91, BVWN and LSDA methods is maximum and equal. Second, we can also consider kinetic and attraction energy, the BVWN has a maximum values in repulsion and kinetic energy, 5521.016 and 1816.157 hartrees, respectively and has minimum SCF and attractive energy, -1841.101 and -15271.485 hartrees, because of the variety of attractive energy and SCF energy is same. We have shown it in Fig. 2. Finally, the LSDA (SVWN) has a maximum Dipole moment, 0.8173. Focusing on dipole moment result, will lead us this fact that any methods has B3 exchange functional, yields a small dipole moment. VWN as a correlation functional and S as an exchange functional yields a large dipole moment value. We have shown it in Table 1.
Fig. 1.Zigzag nanotube (4, 0).
Table 2.The charge of atoms in zigzag(4, 0) nanotube with DFT methods by 6-31G* basis set
Fig. 2.SCF Energy, N-N (repulsion energy), E-N (attraction energy), KE (kinetic energy) with DFT method for zigzag (4, 0) nanotube.
Difference energy among B3P86, B3PW91 and B3LYP demonstrates the correlation effect. They have same exchange functional, B3. This is Becke’s 3 parameters functional,40 which has the form:
Fig. 3.The variety of charge of atoms with DFT method.
Difference energy between B3P86 and B3PW91 methods (5.875 hartrees) is related to correlation energy. It is 5.208 hartrees for B3P86 and B3LYP. If we repeat it for B3LYP and B3PW91, the result will be 0.667 hartrees. We can conclude the correlation functionals of the B3PW91 and B3LYP have a same effect on SCF energy of system nearly, but it is not true about B3P86. We have also calculated the difference energy between B1 and B3 by comparison of energy B1LYP and B3LYP, 0.492 hartrees for obtaining the exchange effect. This result points out that the difference exchange energy between B1, B3 is not large. It was repeated for LSDA and BVWN. Difference energy between them demonstrates difference exchange energy between Becke and Slater functionals. In other word, it is 24.511 hartrees. This value is large. The charges of atoms of carbon nanotube have been collected in Table 2. We have shown and compared the variety charges of atoms among B3LYP, B3PW91 and B3P86 methods at 6-31G* basis set and it was also repeated for LSDA and BVWN in Fig. 3. From this Figure find that if the exchange functional fixes, the charge of atoms will not change. For example in Fig. 3 the carbon atoms with 2, 6, 10, 14, 35, 39, 43 and 47 numbers have the same variety in charge when B3P86, B3PW91 and B3LYP methods with B3 exchange functional were used. It has repeated for SVWN (LSDA) and BVWN with the same correlation functional.
Table 3.The total density of rings in zigzag(4, 0) nanotube with DFT methods by 6-31G* basis set
The importance of electron exchange for the density of rings is demonstrated by a comparison of SVWN and BVWN results. We summarized the total density of rings for zigzag nanotube in Table 3 and Fig. 4. The results calculated for rings of nanotube shows that the poetry in Fig. 4 is less than of Fig. 3, because the rings are composed of some carbon atom. Fig. 4 shows that the rings 13 and 15 numbers have the same variety in all methods. Then total density of cages depends on exchange functional. Fig. 5 shows that B3P86, B3LYP and B3PW91 because of having the same exchange functional (B3) point out the same variety. By changing the exchange functional for example SVWN and BVWN, we have proved it in Table 4 and Fig. 5.
Fig. 4.The variety total density of rings for zigzag (4, 0) nanotube with DFT method.
Table 4.The total density of cages in zigzag(4, 0) nanotube with DFT methods by 6-31G* basis set
Fig. 5.The variety total density of cages for zigzag (4, 0) nanotube with DFT method.
CONCLUSION
While DFT in principle gives a good description of ground state properties, practical applications of DFT are based on approximations for the so-called exchange-correlation potential. The exchange-correlation potential describes the effects of the Pauli principle and coulomb potential beyond a pure electrostatic interaction of the electrons. Possessing the exact exchange-correlation potential means that we solved the many-body problem exactly. The effect of the theoretical treatment of electron correlation and exchange for the description of the varying charges in cages and rings and atoms of carbon nanotube has been investigated by using DFT methods at 6-31G* basis set. In this work, it has been shown that the inclusion of electron exchange-correlation is essential for the description of these properties of carbon nanotube. In present case, we have shown the effect of correlation energy by fixing the exchange functional. For achieving pure correlation energy, it is necessary to combine the exact Hartree-Fock expression for the exchange with an approximate of electron correlation functional.
References
- Iijima, S. Nature 1991, 354, 56. https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0
- Iijima, S.; Ichlhashi, T. Nature 1993, 363, 603. https://doi.org/10.1038/363603a0
- Bethune, D. S.; Kiang, C. H.; Devries, M. S.; Gorman, G.; Savoy, R.; Vazquez, J.; Beyers, R. Nature 1993, 363, 605. https://doi.org/10.1038/363605a0
- Thess, A.; Lee, R.; Nikolaev, P.; Dai, H.; Petit, P.; Robert, J.; Xu, C.; Lee, Y. H.; Kim, S. G.; Rinzler, A. G.; Colbert, D. T.; Scuseria, G. E.; Tomanek, D.; Fisher, J. E.; Smalley, R. E. Science 1996, 273, 483. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5274.483
- Krotov, Y. A.; Lee D.-H.; Louie, S. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78(22), 4245. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4245
- Tuzun, R. E.; Noid, D. W.; Sumpter, B. G.; Merkle, R. C. Nanotechnology 1996, 7(3), 241. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/7/3/012
- Ihara, S.; Itoh, S Surf. Rev. Lett. 1996, 3(1), 827. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X96001492
- Chopra, N. G.; Benedict, L. X.; Crespi, V. H.; Cohen, M. L.; Louie, S. G.; Zettl, A. Nature 1996, 377, 135.
- Menon, M.; Richter, E.; Subbaswamy, K. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104(15), 5875. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.471319
- Hamada, N.; Sawada, S.; Oshiyama, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 78(10), 1579.
- Saito, R.; Fujita, M.; Dresselhaus, G.; Dresselhaus, M. S. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1992, 60, 2204. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.107080
- Blase, X.; Benedict, L. X.; Shirley, E. L.; Louie, S. G. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72(12), 1878. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.1878
- Robertson, D. H.; Brenner, D. W.; Mintmire, J. W. Phys. Rev. B. 1992, 45(21), 12592. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.45.12592
- Yakobson, B. I.; Campbell, M. P.; Brabec, C. J.; Bernholc, J. Comp. Mater. Sci. 1997, 8(5), 341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-5
- Richter, E.; Subbaswamy, K. R. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79(14), 2738. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2738
- Iijima, S.; Brabec, C.; Maiti, A.; Bernholc, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104(5), 2089. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470966
- Tersoff, J.; Ruoff, R. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 73(5), 676. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.676
- Ruoff, R. S.; Tersoff, J.; Lorents, D. C.; Subramoney, S.; Chan, B. Nature 1993, 364, 514. https://doi.org/10.1038/364514a0
- Lee, V. S.; Nimmanpipug, P.; Mollaamin, F.; Kungwan, N.; Thanasanvorakun, S.; Monajjemi, M. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2009, 83(13), 2288. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024409130184
- Monajjemi, M.; Mahdavian, L.; Mollaamin, F.; Khaleghian, M. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2009, 54(9), 1465. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023609090216
- Moradi, O.; Aghaie, M.; Zare, K.; Monajjemi, M.; Aghaie, H. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2009, 170, 673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.012
- Mollaamin, F.; Baei, M. T.; Monajjemi, M.; Zhiani, R.; Honarparvar, B. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2008, 82(13), 2354. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024408130323
- Hohenberg, P.; Kohn, W. Physical Review 1964, 136, B864. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864
- Kohn, W.; Sham, L. J. Physical Review 1965, 140, A1133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133
- The Challenge of d and f Electrons; Salahub, D. R., Zerner, M. C., Eds.; ACS: Washington, D.C., 1989.
- Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules; Oxford Univ. Press: Oxford, 1989.
- Pople, J. A.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G. Chemical Physcs Letters 1992, 199, 557. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(92)85009-Y
- Johnson, B. G.; Frisch, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 7429. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466887
- Johnson, B. G.; Frisch, M. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1993, 216, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(93)E1238-C
- Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Scuseria, G. E.; Frisch, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 10175. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474047
- Monajjemi, M.; Baei, M. T.; Mollaamin, F. Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry 2008, 53(9), 1430. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023608090143
- Monajjemi, M.; Mahdavian, L.; Mollaamin, F. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2008, 22(2), 1.
- Monajjemi, M.; Mollaamin, F.; Gholami. Main Group Metal Chemistry 2003, 26(6), 349.
- Ariafard, A.; Fazaeli, R.; Aghabozorg, H. R.; Monajjemi, M. Journal of Molecular Structure-theochem. 2003, 625, 305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(03)00033-2
- Shabani, M.; Monajjemi, M.; Aghai. H. Journal of Chemical Research-S 2003, 5, 249.
- Vosko, S. H.; Wilk, L.; Nusair, M. Canadian J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200. https://doi.org/10.1139/p80-159
- Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Physical Review 1988, B 37, 785.
- Miehlich, B.; Savin, A.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(89)87234-3
- Perdew, J. P. Phys. Rev. 1986, B33, 8822.
- Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys.1993, 98, 5648. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913
Cited by
- Density Functional Theory Studying for Nicotine Adsorption on Nanotube to Predict Thermodynamic Properties vol.21, pp.9, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2012.654539
- Relation Between Topological Indices and Exchange-Correlation Energy for Graphene Nanosurface: A DFT Study vol.21, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2011.643432
- The Effect of Exchange and Correlation Potentials on Adsorption of Nicotine on Graphene: A DFT Study vol.21, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2012.654538
- Effect of carbon nanotubes on morphology evolution of polypropylene/polystyrene blends: understanding molecular interactions and carbon nanotube migration mechanisms vol.7, pp.85, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA11390K