Korean Circulation Journal

The Korean Society of Cardiology (대한심장학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Is a Metallic Microcoil Really a Permanent Embolic Agent for the Management of Distal Guidewire-Induced Coronary Artery Perforation?

  • Kim, Jae-Hyun (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min-Kyu (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young-Jin (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sun-Man (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kyoung-Ha (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Young-Jin (Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical School, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital)
  • Published : 2011.08.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Coronary artery perforation (CAP) after percutaneous coronary intervention is a rare, but serious complication. It can cause cardiac tamponade, acute myocardial infarction or death. The treatments of CAP involve prolonged balloon inflation, emergent surgery, coil embolization, and implantation of covered stent. We have successfully performed the emergent microcoil embolization in a patient with uncontrolled Ellis grade 3 guidewire-induced CAP resulting in delayed cardiac tamponade. Contrasting our usual expectation, the 1-year follow-up angiography showed a patent flow at the embolized site.

Keywords

References

  1. Gruberg L, Pinnow E, Flood R, et al. Incidence, management, and out-come of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:680-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01053-5
  2. Dippel EJ, Kereiakes DJ, Tramuta DA, et al. Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of abciximab pl-atelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: an algorithm for percutaneous management. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:279-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1065
  3. Fukutomi T, Suzuki T, Popma JJ, et al. Early and late clinical outco-mes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutane-ous coronary intervention. Circ J 2002;66:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.66.349
  4. Gunning MG, Williams IL, Jewitt DE, Shah AM, Wainwright RJ, Th-omas MR. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous interven-tion: incidence and outcome. Heart 2002;88:495-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.88.5.495
  5. Fasseas P, Orford JL, Panetta CJ, et al. Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: analysis of 16,298 procedures. Am Heart J 2004;147:140-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00505-2
  6. Stankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, et al. Incidence, predictors, in-hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations. Am J Cardiol 2004;93:213-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.09.042
  7. Witzke CF, Martin-Herrero F, Clarke SC, Pomerantzev E, Palacios IF. The changing pattern of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the new device era. J Invasive Cardiol 2004;16:257-301.
  8. Javaid A, Buch AN, Satler LF, et al. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:911-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.04.032
  9. Kiernan TJ, Yan BP, Ruggiero N, et al. Coronary artery perforations in the contemporary interventional era. J Interv Cardiol 2009;22:350-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00469.x
  10. Gaxiola E, Browne KF. Coronary artery perforation repair using microcoil embolization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:474-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199804)43:4<474::AID-CCD29>3.0.CO;2-I
  11. Aslam MS, Messersmith RN, Gilbert J, Lakier JB. Successful management of coronary artery perforation with helical platinum micro-coil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:320-2. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-726X(200011)51:3<320::AID-CCD18>3.0.CO;2-U
  12. Assali AR, Moustapha A, Sdringola S, Rihner M, Smalling RW. Successful treatment of coronary artery perforation in an abciximab-tr-eated patient by microcoil embolization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;51:487-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-726X(200012)51:4<487::AID-CCD25>3.0.CO;2-8
  13. Banerjee S, Egdell R, Watkinson A, Greenbaum R. Coronary artery rupture treated with microcoil occlusion. Heart 2001;86:187. https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.86.2.187
  14. Mahmud E, Douglas JS Jr. Coil embolization for successful treatment of perforation of chronically occluded proximal coronary artery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:549-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1221
  15. Katsanos K, Patel S, Dourado R, Sabharwal T. Lifesaving embolization of coronary artery perforation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:1071-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9657-9
  16. Georgiadou P, Karavolias G, Sbarouni E, Adamopoulos S, Malakos J, Voudris V. Coronary artery perforation in patients undergoing percut-aneous coronary intervention: a single-centre report. Acute Card Care 2009;11:216-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482940903254207
  17. Kini AS, Rafael OC, Sarkar K, et al. Changing outcomes and treatment strategies for wire induced coronary perforations in the era of bivalirudin use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;74:700-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22112
  18. Ramana RK, Arab D, Joyal D, et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence and outcomes in the new interventional era. J Invasive Cardiol 2005;17:603-5.
  19. Wong CM, Kwong Mak GY, Chung DT. Distal coronary artery perforation resulting from the use of hydrophilic coated guidewire in tortuous vessels. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;44:93-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199805)44:1<93::AID-CCD22>3.0.CO;2-P
  20. Von Sohsten R, Kopistansky C, Cohen M, Kussmaul WG 3rd. Cardiac tamponade in the "new device" era: evaluation of 6999 consecutive percutaneous coronary interventions. Am Heart J 2000;140:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhj.2000.107996