Free Living Amoeba-Bacteria Interactions: Analysis of Escherichia coli Interactions with Nonpathogenic or Pathogenic Free Living Amoeba

  • Jung, Suk-Yul (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Molecular Diagnosis Research Institute, Namseoul University)
  • Received : 2010.10.15
  • Accepted : 2010.12.02
  • Published : 2011.03.31

Abstract

Free-living amoebae ingest several kinds of bacteria. In other words, the bacteria can survive within free-living amoeba. To determine how Escherichia coli K1 isolate causing neonatal encephalitis and non-pathogenic K12 interact with free-living amoebae, e.g., Acanthamoeba castellanii (T1), A. astronyxis (T7), Naegleria fowleri, association, invasion and survival assays were performed. To understand pathogenicity of free-living amoebae, in vitro cytotoxicity assay were performed using murine macrophages. T1 destroyed macrophages about 64% but T7 did very few target cells. On the other hand, N. fowleri which needed other growth conditions rather than Acanthamoeba destroyed more than T1 as shown by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release assay. In association assays for E. coli binding to amoebae, the T7 exhibited significantly higher association with E. coli, compared with the T1 isolates (P<0.01). Interestingly, N. fowleri exhibited similar percentages of association as T1. Once E. coli bacteria attach or associate with free-living amoeba, they can penetrate into the amoebae. In invasion assays, the K1 (0.67%) within T1 was observed compared with K12 (0%). E. coli K1 and K12 exhibited high association with N. fowleri and bacterial CFU. To determine the fate of E. coli in long-term survival within free-living amoebae, intracellular survival assays were performed by incubating E. coli with free-living amoebae in PBS for 24 h. Intracellular E. coli K1 within T1 (2.5%) and T7 (1.8%) were recovered and grown, while K12 were not found. N. fowleri was not invaded and here it was not recovered.

Keywords

References

  1. Alsam S, Jeong SR, Sissons J, Dudley R, Kim KS, Khan NA. Escherichia coli interactions with Acanthamoeba: a symbiosis with environmental and clinical implications. J Med Microbiol. 2006. 55: 689-694. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.46497-0
  2. Bozue JA, Johanson W. Interaction of Legionella pneumophila with Acanthamoeba castellanii: uptake by coiling phagocytosis and inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion. Infect Immun. 1996. 64: 668-673.
  3. Gao LY, Harb OS, Abu Kwaik Y. Utilization of similar mechanisms by Legionella pneumophila to parasitize two evolutionarily distant host cell, mammalian macrophages and protozoa. Infect Immun. 1997. 65: 4738-4746.
  4. Greub G, Raoult D. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004. 17: 413-433. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004
  5. Jung SY, Alsam S, Kim KS, Khan NA. Pathogen-pathogen interactions: a comparative study of Escherichia coli interactions with the clinical and environmental isolates of Acanthamoeba. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008. 24:2339-2348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9754-y
  6. Jung SY, Kim JH, Song KJ, Lee YJ, Kwon MH, Kim K, Park S, Im KI, Shin HJ. Gene silencing of nfa1 affects the in vitro cytotoxicity of Naegleria fowleri in murine macrophages. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2009. 165: 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.01.007
  7. Jung SY, Matin A, Kim KS, Khan NA. The capsule plays an important role in Escherichia coli K1 interactions with Acanthamoeba. Int J Parasitol. 2007. 37: 413-423.
  8. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba: biology and increasing importance in human health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006. 30: 564-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2006.00023.x
  9. Khan NA. Acanthamoeba invasion of the central nervous system. Int J Parasitol. 2007. 37: 131-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.11.010
  10. La Scola B, Raoult D. Survival of Coxiella burnetii within freeliving amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001. 7: 75-79.
  11. Marciano-Cabral F, Cabral G. Acanthamoeba spp. as agents of disease in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003. 16: 273-307. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.16.2.273-307.2003
  12. Newsome AL, Baker RL, Miller RD, Arnold RR. Interactions between Naegleria fowleri and Legionella pneumophila. Infect Immun. 1985. 50: 449-452.
  13. Raschke WC, Baird S, Ralph P, Nakoinz I. Functional macrophage cell lines transformed by Abelson leukemia virus. Cell. 1978. 15: 261-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(78)90101-0
  14. Rowbotham TJ. Preliminary report on the pathogenicity of Legionella pneumophila for freshwater and soil amoebae. J Clin Pathol. 1980. 33: 1179-1983. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.33.12.1179
  15. Willaert E. Isolement et culture in vitro des amibes de genre Naegleria. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 1971. 51: 701-708.
  16. Yan L, Cerny RL, Cirillo JD. Evidence that hsp90 is involved in the altered interactions of Acanthamoeba castellanii variants with bacteria. Eukaryot Cells. 2004. 3: 567-578. https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.3.3.567-578.2004