Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of augmented alveolar bone with vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant installation

수직 치조골 신장술 후 증대된 치조골과 임플란트의 예후 평가

  • Shet, Uttom Kumar (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seung-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • ;
  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정승곤 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.05.13
  • Accepted : 2011.09.29
  • Published : 2011.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical result of vertical alveolar distraction, especially the distracted alveolar bone and installed implants. Materials and Methods: Twenty-one patients who have been received the vertical alveolar distraction and implant installation on 22 areas (3 maxilla and 19 mandible) using intraoral alveolar distraction device were examined. After consolidation period of 3-4 months, distraction devices were removed and 91 implants were installed in the distracted alveolar bone. The distracted bone and implants were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results: Mean height of distracted alveolar bone was $7.5{\pm}3.2$ mm (range: 2.5-15.0 mm). Mean follow-up period after completion of the distraction was 3.1 years (range: 1.4-11.5 years). Mean resorption of distracted alveolar bone was $1.6{\pm}1.8$ mm. The success and survival rates of implants was 95.3% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: Results of this study indicate that vertical alveolar distraction procedure is a useful and stable method for alveolar ridge augmentation and implantation.

Keywords

References

  1. Keller EE, Triplett WW. Iliac bone grafting: review of 160 consecutive cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:11-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90079-6
  2. Costantino PD, Shybut G, Friedman CD, Pelzer HJ, Masini M, Shindo ML, et al. Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. An experimental study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;116:535-45. https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1990.01870050035003
  3. Codivilla A. On the means of lengthening in the lower limbs, the musles, and tissues which are shortened through deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1905;s2-2:353-69.
  4. Ilizarov GA. The principles of the Ilizarov method. Bull Hosp Jt Dis Orthop Inst 1988;48:1-11.
  5. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:1-8; discussion 9-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199289010-00001
  6. Nishimura T, Jinbo M, Ikeda H, Masahiko S, Nara S, Toriyabe M, et al. Study on ridge augmentation by callus distraction (callotasis). Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;38:1357-63. https://doi.org/10.5794/jjoms.38.1357
  7. Chin M, Toth BA. Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:45-53; discussion 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90303-1
  8. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multicenter study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  9. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longterm efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1: 11-25.
  10. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989;263-85.
  11. Kojimoto H, Yasui N, Goto T, Matsuda S, Shimomura Y. Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:543-9.
  12. Lee YU, Park CY, Song JW, Park HJ, Kim YW, Oh HK, et al. Implant installation after mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation using intraoral distraction device: report of 5 cases. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;24:176-83.
  13. Chiapasco M, Consolo U, Bianchi A, Ronchi P. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a multicenter prospective study on humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:399-407.
  14. Enislidis G, Fock N, Millesi-Schobel G, Klug C, Wittwer G, Yerit K, et al. Analysis of complications following alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in the partially edentulous mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.021
  15. Ettl T, Gerlach T, Schu¨sselbauer T, Gosau M, Reichert TE, Driemel O. Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:481-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0340-y
  16. Block MS, Cervini D, Chang A, Gottsegen GB. Anterior maxillary advancement using tooth-supported distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:561-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90069-1
  17. Rachmiel A, Levy M, Laufer D. Lengthening of the mandible by distraction osteogenesis: report of cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:838-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(95)90346-1
  18. Garcia AG, Martin MS, Vila PG, Maceiras JL. Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:496-501. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.31844
  19. Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM, Browne EZ Jr. Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 1973;51:506-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197305000-00003
  20. Block MS, Daire J, Stover J, Matthews M. Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve following mandibular lengthening in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51:652-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80265-4
  21. Gantous A, Phillips JH, Catton P, Holmberg D. Distraction osteogenesis in the irradiated canine mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:164-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199401000-00025
  22. Uckan S, Haydar SG, Dolanmaz D. Alveolar distraction: analysis of 10 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;94:561-5. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128023
  23. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Vogel G. Vertical distraction osteogenesis of edentulous ridges for improvement of oral implant positioning: a clinical report of preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:43-51.
  24. Mazzonetto R, Allais M, Maurette PE, Moreira RW. A retrospective study of the potential complications during alveolar distraction osteogenesis in 55 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:6-10.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.06.014
  25. Uckan S, Haydar SG, Imirzalioglu P, Acar AG. Repositioning of malpositioned segment during alveolar distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:963-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.33874
  26. Oh HK, Park HJ, Cho JY, Park YJ, Kook MS. Vector control of malpositioned segment during alveolar distraction osteogenesis by using rubber traction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:608-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.074
  27. Erkut S, Uckan S. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in a severely resorbed maxilla: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:340-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.015
  28. Kilic E, Kilic K, Alkan A. Alternative method to reposition the dislocated transport segment during vertical alveolar distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2306-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.026
  29. Mazzonetto R, Serra E Silva FM, Ribeiro Torezan JF. Clinical assessment of 40 patients subjected to alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Implant Dent 2005;14:149-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000165026.11781.f4
  30. Paeng JY, Myoung H, Hwang SJ, Seo BM, Choi JY, Lee JH, et al. Clinical evaluation of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant installation. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;28:329-38.
  31. Garcia AG, Martin MS, Vila PG, Saulacic N, Rey JM. Palatal approach for maxillary alveolar distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:795-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2004.01.012
  32. Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhike L, Reed C. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:52-68.
  33. Saulacic′N, Somosa Martl′n M, de Los Angeles Leon Camacho M, Garcl′a Garcl′a A. Complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A clinical investigation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65: 267-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.03.049
  34. Block MS, Almerico B, Crawford C, Gardiner D, Chang A. Bone response to functioning implants in dog mandibular alveolar ridges augmented with distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:342-51.
  35. Aghaloo TL, Moy PK. Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22(Suppl): 49-70.

Cited by

  1. Vertical Ridge Gain with Various Bone Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis vol.28, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13028