INTRODUCTION
Carbon/carbon composites are the most promising type of fiber because of the highest specific modulus and highest specific strength of all reinforcing fibers. These properties are sustained temperatures up to higher than 2000 ℃ in vacuum and inert atmospheres. However, they have low oxidation resistance in an oxidative environment (CF begins to be oxidized at 750 K in air) and chemical reactivity, and are therefore not widely used either in metalmatrix and ceramic-matrix composites or in high-temperature polymer-matrix composites.1-3 Therefore, due to the significant influence of the oxidation behavior of CFs on the properties of the related composite materials, oxidation is one of the major limiting factors in determining the lifetime and performance of CFs and their composites in many applications.4-6 The oxidation behavior of the composites may also be controlled by the oxidation behavior of the reinforcing fibers. Therefore, studies on the oxidation behavior of CFs have been of interest to many researchers.7-9 The factors affecting characteristics of oxidation reaction include microstructural characteristics related to the heterogeneity taking place during the manufacturing of the carbon materials, and structural changes of pores and carbon materials by oxidation reaction.10-13 The commercial CFs exhibit various mechanical properties, crystallite dimensions, and microstructures derived from the precursor and manufacturing process. Therefore it will be important to observe how these parameters affect the oxidation behavior of such CFs. The present study is concentrated on the oxidation behaviors of the carbon fibers on the basis of the microstructure and the relationships with mechanical properties of the microstructure of the pitch-, PAN-, and rayon-based CFs.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials
Characteristic properties of the CFs are presented in Table 1, including the manufacturers’ quoted mechanical properties. A detailed study of the fiber microstructure and oxidation behavior was concentrated upon four main CFs, mesophase pitch-based CF (Pl5), PAN-based high modulus type (M40) and high tenacity types T1000 and T300, and rayon-based CF (T22). All CFs used in the study were received from commercial sources.
Table 1.Physical and mechanical properties of the CFs
Oxidation
The oxidation reactions were carried out under the following conditions. The samples were heated from room temperature up to 580 ℃ at a heating rate of 20 ℃/min in nitrogen flow (50 ml/min). And then samples were oxidized at 580 ℃ in air flow (50 ml/min). Approximately 10 mg samples were used in each case.
Sample characterization
Wide angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to analyze the structural evolution of the CFs. XRD traces were obtained from ground-up samples of the fibers, using a DMax-2400 diffractometer and CuKá radiation (λ=0.15418 nm). The structure of fibers was studied by using Hitachi Scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4700, Hitachi) and compared with the structure before/after oxidation. The oxidation rates of these fibers rate were determined with the mass loss and the time reacted (air flow rate: 10 ml/min) using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA, Shimadzu Inc.). A heating rate of 20 ℃/min was used throughout this work. Specific surface area (SSA) and pore size distributions of the oxidized CFs were evaluated using Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation (ASAP2020, Micromeritics, USA) after preheating the samples to 150 ℃ for 2 h to eliminate the adsorbed water.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Surface Morphology
Fig. 1 shows the microstructure of the surface of the various CFs before and after 50% mass loss by oxidation. On the right side in Fig. 1 show morphological microstructures along the perpendicular direction of various CFs partially oxidized at 50 wt.% mass loss. It was seen the development of alignment of a sheet-like layers in P15, which show parallel alignment of the grapheme-like layers at the center of the fibers as well as that towards the periphery (Fig. 1a). However, high strength PAN-based CFs T300 and T1000 exhibit somewhat different microstructure, which are presented to possess multi-layed microstructure in Fig. 1b~d. The lower crystalline regions could be etched earlier than the higher crystalline region by the oxidation reactions.14-17 It was reported the multi-layered structure of CF caused by insufficient carbonization at the middle area of fiber during the manufacture.18,19 The T1000 with better mechanical property exhibits more clear-cut boundary than T300. On the other hand, the high modulus PAN-based fiber M40 does not show any layers, which would be resulted from the homogeneously crystallization through high temperature heat treatment. The T22 formed voids all along the cross sectional area, which would be resulted from low crystalline structure in all over the fiber (Fig. 1e).
Fig. 1.SEM images of CFs of partially oxidized CFs at 50% wt.% mass loss: (a) P15 (b) M40, (c) T1000, (d) T300, (e) T22 (left side: before oxidation, right side: after oxidation).
XRD analysis
The high modulus CF shows superior mechanical, electrical and chemical properties because of its highly ordered structure. Generally, the mechanical modulus of fiber is influenced by the degree of orientation along the fiber axis.20-22 From the XRD patterns (Fig. 2) of CFs except P15, broad peak located between 20 and 30° assigned as the d002 layers, representing the presence of disordered carbon structure. The (002) peak for the P15 is much sharper than any other samples, indicating the high degree of graphitization.
Fig. 2.X-ray diffraction spectra of various CFs.
Apparent crystallite parameters (d002, Lc, and La) of various CFs as evaluated from their XRD patterns are complied in Fig. 3. From the position of the (002) peak (2θ) in XRD, the interplanar spacing d(002) was determined using the Bragg equation:
where λ is the wavelength of X-ray (0.15418 nm), and θ is Braggs’s angle. The d(002) value is traditionally used to estimate the graphitization degree of carbons. In general, growing disorder in the materials is reflected in increased values of d(002).23 From the position and the full-width at half-maximum intensity of the (002) peak, an attempt was made to estimate the crystal size; Lc (crystalline height) and La (crystalline width) using the Scherrer equation:
Lc and La values were calculated from the peak width at half-maximum intensity, β, of the (002) peak, where K=0.9 for Lc and K=1.84 for La.24
Fig. 3.The interlayer spacing d(002), crystalline height Lc and the crystalline width La of various CFs.
As shown in Fig. 3, Lc and La values decreased, while the interlayer spacing, d002 value increased in the order of P15, M40, T1000, T300, T22, that is, mesophase pitch based, high modulus PAN based, high strength PAN based and rayon based. These crystallite dimensions of various CFs are in good with oxidation resistant properties of the CFs. The CFs consisted of poorly oriented crystallites and/or very tiny crystallities introduce lower activation barriers to be accessed of oxygen resulting higher rate of mass reduction by oxidation reaction because of the more porous structure.
Isothermal oxidation reaction and SSA
Fig. 4 illustrates the relation between weight loss and oxidation time when five samples were exposed to air at 853 K. It can be seen that the oxidation resistance of CFs in air increases in the order of Rayon- based (T22) < PANbased (M40, T1000, T300) < Pitch (P15)-based CF. The rayon-based CFs with high oxidation rate reached up to 50% after oxidation for only 150 min and were almost burnt out after 200 min, while the weight loss of P15 is only 3% in 200 min. Therefore, CFs with high modulus are found to be more oxidation resistant than CFs with high strength.
Fig. 4.TGA plots for oxidation of CFs in air at 853 K.
Fig. 5.Arrhenius plot of oxidation kinetics for various CFs.
Table 2.Apparent activation energies of various CFs
The Arrhenius curves of oxidized CFs are shown in Fig. 5. A plot of lnK vs. (1/T) produces the iso-conversionline and from the slope of which, the activation energy, Ea, values can be calculated at a constant conversion.25 A plot of lnK vs. (1/T) shows good linearity and the activation energy, Ea, values can be calculated from the slope of the graph. The apparent activation energy for T22 fibers is 55.75 kJ/mole, while that of P15 fibers is 220.69 kJ/mole in Table 2. The reason for the difference in the reaction rates of various CFs can be explained on the basis of crystallite parameters. This means that P15 fibers have much higher crystalliity contain less edge carbon atoms (i.e., more of the initiation centers for oxidation) than other CFs.
Nitrogen adsorption measurements of the oxidized CFs (wt. loss 50%) were performed at 77 K in Fig. 6. According to BDDT (Brunauer-Deming-Deming-Teller) classification, 26 the isotherms are of Type I, indicating that oxidized CFs are microporous materials, and they appear to have more a rounded “knee” that is normally associated with wider micropores. It is evident that most of the pore volumes of samples are filled below P/P0≈0.1, indicating that these samples are highly microporous. After a sharp increase to 0.1, the isotherm slowly bends, showing smaller increments in further adsorption. Therefore, the adsorption/desorption behaviors of oxidized CFs are characterized as a typical Type I isotherm for microporous features and pores well developed in oxidized in the order of P15< M40 Fig. 6.Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms curves of oxidized CFs (wt. loss 50%). Table 3.The SSA values and total pore volume of oxidized CFs (wt. loss 50%) Table 3 shows the specific surface area (SSA) values and total pore volume of oxidized CFs at weight loss 50%. The oxidation reaction between reacting gas (oxygen) and carbon atoms takes place in active sites. Thus the process of pore development by oxidation reaction needs diffusion first, and then, reaction products come out through pores. As shown in Table 3, the oxidized M40 fibers show a very small SSA value compared T22. T1000 and T300 have high average pore diameter, due to clear-cut boundary of multi-layed microstructure in Fig. 1c~d. The SSA of the P15 was almost before/after oxidation. The P15 have very highly crystalline structure, and the number of active sites is limited because there is not enough space for pores to be created. In other words, the number of active sites decreases as the crystallites sizes increase. After all, oxidation reactions of the CFs are mainly dependent on defect and/or crystallinity, so there could be reasonably explained by the SSA. So, the reaction of the initial oxidation, considering the overall structure of the fiber, is likely to take place at less dense parts. The following oxidation reaction is more easily taken place after opening pores from fiber surface to inside. Since pores are created or enlarged by the removal of carbon atoms existing in the active sites, the sizes of crystallites will decrease as the pores develop. The comparative investigation of various commercial carbon fibers leads to the following results: (a) This difference for the pitch-, PAN-, and Rayonbased CFs was explained by the relationship between microstructure, mechanical properties, and oxidation behavior. (b) The structure of pitch-based CFs had alignment of a slit-like layers, while PAN-based CFs had the skin-core structure after oxidation. (c) The CFs consisted of poorly oriented crystallites and/or very tiny crystallities have many crystallite edges. Since the crystallite edges will act as an active site the fiber has low oxidation resistivity. (d) The high modulus fibers, heat treated to graphitization temperatures, were found to be more oxidation resistant than high strength carbon fibers.CONCLUSIONS
References
- Luthra, K. L. Carbon 1988, 26, 217. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(88)90040-1
- Baklanova, N. I.; Kulyu, V. N.; Lyakhov, N. Z. Inorg. Mater. 1997, 33, 682.
- Kim, B.-H.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, C.H.; Yang, K.S.; Lee, T.-J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 257, 662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.052
- Prewo, K. M.; Batt, J. A. J. Mater. Sci. 1988, 23, 523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174679
- Bleay, S. M.; Scott, V. D. Carbon 1991, 29, 871. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90161-B
- Cho, D.; Ha, H. S.; Lim, Y. S.; Yoon, B. I.; Kim, K. S. Carbon 1996, 34, 861. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)00016-4
- Dhami, T. L.; Manocha, L. M.; Bahl, O. P. Carbon 1991, 29, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90094-Y
- Manocha, L. M.; Bahl, O. P. Carbon 1988, 26, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(88)90004-8
- Manocha, L. M.; Bahl, O. P.; Singh, Y. K. Carbon 1989, 27, 381. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(89)90070-5
- Mahajan, O. P.; Yarzab, R.; Walker, P. L. Fuel 1978, 57, 643. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(78)90196-5
- Sanchez, A. R.; Elguezabal, A. A.; Torre Saenz, L. L. Carbon 2001, 39, 1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00253-0
- Kasaoka, S.; Sakata, Y.; Kayano, S.; Masuoka, Y. Int. Chem. Eng. 1983, 23, 477.
- Hu, Y. Q.; Nikzat, H.; Nawata, M.; Kobayashi, N.; Hasatani, M. Fuel 2001, 80, 2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00086-2
- Matsumoto, T.; Mochida, I. Carbon 1993, 31, 143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(93)90167-9
- Blanco, C.; Lu, S. Carbon 2003, 41, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00277-4
- Warner, S. B.; Peebles, L. H.; Uhlmann, D. R. J. Mater. Sci. 1979, 14, 556.
- Lv, M.-Y.; Ge, H.-Y.; Chen, J. J. Polym. Res. 2008, 16, 513.
- Blanco, S.; Lu, C.; Rand, B. Carbon 2002, 40, 132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00249-4
- Roh, J.-S.; Kim, S.-H. Carbon Lett. 2009, 10, 38. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2009.10.1.038
- Donnet, J. B.; Bansal, R. C. Carbon Fibers, 2nd ed.; Marcel Decker: New York, 1990.
- Dami, T. L.; Manocha, L. M.; Bahl, O. P. Carbon 1999, 29, 51.
- Ismail, M. K. Carbon 1991, 29, 777. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90017-D
- Liu, C.-L.; Dong, W.-S.; Song, J.-R.; Liu, L. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 459, 347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.067
- Cullity, B. D. Elements of X-Ray Diffraction; Addison-Wesley Publishing Company: Menlo Park, 1978.
- Gao, P.; Wang, H.; Jin, Z. Thermochimica. Acta 2004, 414, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2003.11.017
- Brunauer, B.; Deming, L. S.; Deming, W. E.; Teller, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1940, 62, 1723. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01864a025
Cited by
- A new softening agent for melt spinning of softwood kraft lignin vol.129, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1002/app.38795
- Growth of N-doped BiOBr nanosheets on carbon fibers for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants under visible light irradiation vol.260, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.04.005
- Preliminary dynamic-mechanical analysis of polypropylene/short carbon fibers composites modified by a succinic anhydride-grafted atactic polypropylene vol.57, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.24620
- Mesopores variation in polyacrylonitrile fibers during dry-jet wet spinning process vol.28, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-019-00699-2
- Effect of low processing rate on homogeneous microstructural evolution of polyacrylonitrile-based carbon fibers vol.29, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-019-00047-7