환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지

제주도 고산 측정소의 미세먼지 측정방법에 따른 질량농도 비교

Comparison of the PM10 Concentration in Different Measurement Methods at Gosan Site in Jeju Island

  • Shin, So-Eun (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Pyo (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kang, Chang-Hee (Department of Chemistry, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.05.11
  • 심사 : 2010.08.11
  • 발행 : 2010.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The reliability of the measurement of ambient trace species is an important issue, especially, in background area such as Gosan in Jeju Island. In a previous episodic study, it was suggested that the PM10 measurement result by the gravimetric method(GMM) was not in agreement with the result by the ${\beta}$-ray absorption method(BAM). In this study, a systematic comparison was carried out for the data between 2001 and 2008 at Gosan(GMM and BAM) and Jeju city (BAM) which is near to Gosan. It was found that at Gosan the PM10 concentration by BAM was higher than GMM and the correlation between them was low. The BAM results at Gosan and Jeju city showed similar trend implying the discrepancy at Gosan was not caused by instrumental problem of the BAM at Gosan. Based on the previous studies two probable reasons for the discrepancy are identified; (1) negative measurement error by the evaporation of volatile ambient species at the filter in GMM such as nitrate and ammonium and (2) positive error by the absorption of water vapor during measurement in BAM. There was no heater at the inlet of BAM at Gosan during the sampling period. Based on the size-segregated measurement data, it was identified that the evaporation error was minor, if any. The relationship between the two methods did not vary with the ambient relative humidity. Thus, at present, it is not clear why the discrepancy had been occurring and when using the PM10 data at Gosan, one should be aware the possible errors.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 공부주, 박진수, 이상덕, 김상균, 김정수, 이석조, 2010, Characteristics of Particle composition at national background site, 한국대기환경학회 2010년 춘계학술대회논문집, 175-176.
  2. 국립환경과학원, 2006, 장거리이동 입자상물질의 화학적 특성과 거동에 관한 연구, 국립환경과학원.
  3. 국립환경과학원, 2007, 장거리이동 입자상물질의 화학적 특성과 거동에 관한 연구(II), 국립환경과학원.
  4. 김용표, 2000, 해염성분에 의한 에어로솔 물성변화모사연구, 한국대기환경학회지, 16, 113-120.
  5. 김용표, 2005, 미세먼지 측정에서 휘발성분 측정오차 정량, 2005년도 대기환경학회 측정 및 분석 학술 강습회.
  6. 이종훈, 1999, 동북아시아지역 대기오염물질의 장거리 이동에 관한 연구, 박사학위 논문, 건국대학교 대학원.
  7. 정창훈, 조용성, 황승만, 정용국, 유재천, 신동석, 2007, 비교 측정을 동한 PM10 질량농도의 오차 분석, 한국대기환경학회지, 23, 689-698.
  8. 정창훈, 박진희, 황승만, 정용국, 2009, 측정방법 및 기상상태에 따른 PM-10 질량농도 비교, 한국입자에어로졸학회지, 5, 53-62.
  9. Arimoto, R., Kim, Y. J., Kim, Y. P., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Anderson, T. L., Gong, S., Uno, I., Chin, M., Huebert, B. J., Clarke, A. D., Shinozuka, Y., Weber, R. j., Anderson, J. R., Guazzotti, S. A., Sullivan, R. C., Sodeman, D. A., Prather, K. A., and Sokolik, I. N., 2006, Characterization of Asian dust during ASCE-Asia, Global and Planetary Change, 52, 23-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2006.02.013
  10. Chang, C. T., Tsai, C. J., Lee, C. T., Chang, S. Y., Cheng, M. T., and Chein, H. M., 2001, Differences in PM10 concentrations measured by $\beta$-gauge monitor and hivol sampler, Atmospheric Environment, 35, 5741-5748. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00369-7
  11. Katsuyuki, T. K., Hiroaki, M. R., and Kazuhiko, S. K., 2008, Examination of discrepancies between beta-attenuation and gravimetric methods for the monitoring of particulate matter, Atmospheric Environment, 42, 5232- 5240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.02.057
  12. Kim, N. K., Park, H.-J., and Kim, Y. P., 2009, Chemical composition change in TSP due to dust storm at Gosan, Korea: Do the concentrations of anthropogenic species increase due to dust storm?, Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 204, 165-175, doi 10.107/s11270-009-0035-7.
  13. Park, M. H., Kim, Y. P., Kang, C.-H., and Shim, S.-G., 2004, Aerosol composition change between 1992 and 2002 at Gosan, Korea, J. Geophysical Research, 109, D19S13, doi:10.1029/2003JD004110.