Development of Strategic Environment Assessment Model in Urban Development Plan - In case of Metropolitan Plan -

도시개발 행정계획의 전략환경평가 모델개발 - 광역도시계획에의 사례적용 -

  • Received : 2010.05.17
  • Accepted : 2010.07.22
  • Published : 2010.08.31

Abstract

It is essential to consider strategies, spatial planning, and reflection of sustainability for the creation of sound urban spaces. To this end, there is a need for plans that can secure better sustainability through strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of plans. This study examined the literature and available precedent to develop a SEA model for administrative plans for urban development including metropolitan plans, urban master plans and urban management plans. In the course of development of the model, environmental issues associated with the urban plans were analyzed by classifying them into ten categories, including "spatial planning," "conservation planning," "greenbelt systems," "habitats." and etc. according to their rank. Furthermore, those issues were reflected on the development of environmental evaluation indices for the plans. Overall and detailed environmental indices that can be applied to the administrative plans for urban development including metropolitan plans, urban master plans and urban management plans were devised for five stages: (1) Establishment of development goals and strategy, (2) Analysis of current status and characteristics, (3) Conceptualization of spatial structure, (4) Planning for each department, and (5) Execution and management. Sub plans are more detailed and concrete. Criteria based on the evaluation indices, when performing evaluations on plans based on each environmental assessment index in reference to experts and the literature, were used to forecast their effects, i.e. whether they had a positive, negative, or no effect or relationship, or whether their effects was uncertain. Based on the forecasts, this study then presents means to establish more improvable plans. Furthermore, by synthesis of the effects according to each index and integration of the process, plans were analyzed overall. This study reflects the characteristics of the present time period based on issues in the SEA process and techniques in upper level administrative plans being newly established, and presents them according to the stage of each plan. Furthermore, by forecasting the effect of plans by stage, this study presents proposals for improvement, and in this aspect, can be meaningful in promoting plan improvements through SEA.

Keywords

References

  1. 국토해양부, 2006, 전략환경평가업무처리 규정.
  2. 국토해양부a, 2008, 광역도시계획수립지침.
  3. 국토해양부b, 2008, 도시기본계획수립지침.
  4. 국토해양부c, 2008. 도시관리계획수립지침.
  5. 국가지속가능발전위원회, 2008, 법령 및 중장기 계획의 지속가능성 검토방안 연구, p.1.
  6. 고양시, 2005, 2025년 고양도시기본계획(안).
  7. 고양시, 2006, 고양시 도시관리계획 결정 (변경)에 관한 환경성검토서.
  8. 동두천시, 2005, 2020 동두천 도시기본계획(안).
  9. 동두천, 2007. 동두천 도시관리계획 수립에 따른 환경성검토보고서.
  10. 전라남도, 2005, 2025년 광양만권 광역도시계획(안).
  11. 성남시, 2004, 2020년 성남 도시기본계획(안).
  12. 이상문 등, 2000, 환경친화적인 도시계획 수립을 위한 환경성평가 지표개발에 관한 연구, 35(5), 221-231.
  13. 이재준 등, 2001, 환경친화적인 도시계획 수립을 위한 환경성 평가 및 평가지표 적합성 판단 연구, 대한국토도시계획학회지, 36(2). 7-17
  14. 이희정, 김광중, 2003, 서울시 지구단위계획 실효성 개선방안 연구: 지구단위계획의유형화를 중심으로, 서울시정개발연구원.
  15. 전환용, 2006, 도시계획학 원론.
  16. 최막중 등, 2009, 국토이용관리체계의 개편방안, 도시정보 No.333.
  17. 최희선, 2008, 도시개발에서 환경생태계획의 체계적 도입방안에 관한 연구. 한국환경정책, 평가연구원.
  18. 환경부, 2006, 사전환경성검토 업무 매뉴얼.
  19. 환정부, 2009, 통합 환경영향평가법 하위규정 제정 연구.
  20. Puget Sound Regional Council, 2005, Vision 2020+20 Update: Issue paper on Environmental Planning, pp.7-32.
  21. Hyder-Mott Connell Joint Venture, 2001, Strategic Environmental Assessmem Key Issue Report, pp.14-38.