Korean Journal of Radiology

  • 제11권3호
  • /
  • Pages.327-332
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1229-6929(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-8330(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cellular Density Evaluation for Malignant Lymphoma Using Equivalent Cross-Relaxation Rate Imaging - Initial Experience

  • Nishiofuku, Hideyuki (Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University) ;
  • Matsushima, Shigeru (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Inaba, Yoshitaka (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Yamaura, Hidekazu (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Sato, Yozo (Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Morishima, Yasuo (Department of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital) ;
  • Kichikawa, Kimihiko (Department of Radiology, Nara Medical University)
  • 투고 : 2009.06.30
  • 심사 : 2010.01.04
  • 발행 : 2010.06.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: Equivalent cross-relaxation rate (ECR) imaging is an MRI technique used to evaluate quantitatively a change in the protein-water interaction. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively the usefulness of ECR imaging for the histologic classification of malignant lymphoma (ML). Materials and Methods: Institutional Review Board approval was obtained and all patients provided informed consent. The study subjects included 15 patients with untreated ML who were histologically diagnosed with follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 8) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 7). All patients underwent ECR imaging and the offset frequency was set at 7 ppm. Results: The median ECR values were 71% (range; 60.7 to 75.5) in FL and 54% (50.8 to 59.4) in DLBCL (p = 0.001). The median cellular density was $1.5{\pm}0.17{\times}10^6/mm^2$ in FL and $1.0{\pm}0.70{\times}10^6/mm^2$ in DLBCL (p = 0.001). The correlation coefficient between the ECR values and cellular density in ML was 0.88 (p = 0.001). In FL and DLBCL, assuming ECR value cut-off points of 60%, both sensitivity and specificity were 100%. Conclusion: A strong correlation between ECR and cellular density in ML is demonstrated and the ECR may be a useful technique to differentiate between FL and DLBCL.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Matsushima S, Sasaki F, Kinosada Y, Maeda H, Sogami M, Era S, et al. Saturation transfer ratio imaging in invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:379-385 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00146-0
  2. Callicott C, Thomas JM, Goode AW. The magnetization transfer characteristics of human breast tissues: an in vitro NMR study. Phys Med Biol 1999;44:1147-1154 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/5/003
  3. Sogami M, Era S, Kinosada Y, Matsushima S, Kato K, Tomida M, et al. Basic studies on the equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging (equivalent CRI)--phantom studies. NMR Biomed 2001;14:367-375 https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.721
  4. Matsushima S, Takasu A, Inai Y, Hirabayashi T, Era S, Sogami M, et al. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging in the synthetic copolymer gels and invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2002;20:285-293 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(02)00476-9
  5. Moran PR, Hamilton CA. Near-resonance spin-lock contrast. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13:837-846 https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(95)00029-G
  6. Ulmer JL, Mathews VP, Hamilton CA, Elster AD, Moran PR. Magnetization transfer or spin-lock? An investigation of offresonance saturation pulse imaging with varying frequency offsets. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:805-819
  7. Mastsushima S, Nishiofuku H, Iwata H, Era S, Inaba Y, Kinosada Y. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1278-1283 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21355
  8. Isasi CR, Lu P, Blaufox MD. A metaanalysis of 18F-2-deoxy-2- fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the staging and restaging of patients with lymphoma. Cancer 2005;104:1066-1074 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21253
  9. Karam M, Novak L, Cyriac J, Ali A, Nazeer T, Nugent F. Role of fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan in the evaluation and follow-up of patients with lowgrade lymphomas. Cancer 2006;107:175-183 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21967
  10. Juweid ME, Cheson BD. Role of positron emission tomography in lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4577-4580 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.01.904
  11. Brennan DD, Gleeson T, Coate LE, Cronin C, Carney D, Eustace SJ. A comparison of whole-body MRI and CT for the staging of lymphoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:711-716 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.185.3.01850711
  12. Sogami M, Era S, Koseki T, Nagai N. Structural characterization of the molten globule and native states of ovalbumin: a 1H NMR study. J Pept Res 1997;50:465-474
  13. Yuen S, Yamada K, Kinosada Y, Matsushima S, Nakano Y, Goto M, et al. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging of breast cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:56-65 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20088
  14. Jakic-Razumovic J, Aurer I. The World Health Organization classification of lymphomas. Croat Med J 2002;43:527-534
  15. Schoder H, Noy A, Gonen M, Weng L, Green D, Erdi YE, et al. Intensity of 18fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in positron emission tomography distinguishes between indolent and aggressive non- Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4643-4651 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.12.072
  16. Koh DM, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1622-1635 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.06.1403
  17. Matsushima S, Sasaki F, Sarumaru S, Ohta D, Era S, Sogami M, et al. Equivalent cross relaxation rate image for decreasing a false negative case of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:1045-1047 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0730-725X(03)00208-X
  18. Matsushima S, Sasaki F, Yamaura H, Iwata H, Ohsaki H, Era S, et al. Equivalent cross-relaxation rate imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast carcinoma. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:1300-1304 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20685