Clinical sign and transmission of foot-and-mouth disease in deer, Review

사슴에서의 구제역 증상과 전파 가능성

  • Park, Jong-Hyeon (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Nyeong (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Kim, Su-Mi (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Ko, Young-Joon (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Lee, Hyang-Sim (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service) ;
  • Cho, In-Soo (Foreign Animal Disease Division, National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service)
  • 박종현 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과) ;
  • 이광녕 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과) ;
  • 김수미 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과) ;
  • 고영준 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과) ;
  • 이향심 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과) ;
  • 조인수 (국립수의과학검역원 해외전염병과)
  • Received : 2010.03.22
  • Accepted : 2010.06.11
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) commonly infects cloven-hoofed livestock animals such as cattle, pig, sheep, and goat and its clinical signs are well-known. Besides livestock, FMD can be transmitted among cloven-hoofed animals in the wild. FMD mostly affects livestock animals in farms, but, wild animals are likely to play a pivotal role in spreading the disease due to their way of free living. In the case of deer, the clinical signs of FMD vary widely from subclinical to severe infections. Thus, in some deer species, it may be hard to verify clinical signs of FMD. A deer may carry the virus up to 11 weeks after exposure, shedding the virus during the period. However, deer is not considered as a typical host for persistent infection like buffalo, cattle or sheep. In Korea, small-scale livestock farms which have less than 10 animals make up 63.6% of the entire livestock farms. Considering raising environment in deer farms, it is assumed that the risk of virus excretion and consequent transmission of FMD among deers is relatively lower than other cloven-hoofed animals. However, Sika deer and Elk which are typical deer species in Korea would manifest mild to subclinical symptoms upon FMD infection. Therefore, laboratory testing is necessary to confirm FMD in these animals because of difficulty in verifying clinical signs and the risk of virus shedding during inapparent infection.

Keywords

References

  1. 조영숙, 추금숙, 이정원, 카머게리, 체가로바이리나, 설민숙, 박현종, 김범석, 임채웅. 2009. 사육사슴 및 야생고라니의 소바이러스성 전염병에 대한 혈청학적 연구. 한국가축위생학회지 32(2): 111-117.
  2. Alexandersen S, Mowat N. 2005. Foot-and-mouth disease: host range and pathogene- Alexandersen S, Zhang Z, sis. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 288: 9-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27109-0_2
  3. Donaldson AI, Garland AJ. 2003. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol 129(1): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(03)00041-0
  4. Alexandersen S, Zhang Z, Donaldson AI, Gar-land AJ. 2003. The pathogenesis and diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol 129(1): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(03)00041-0
  5. Forman AJ, Gibbs EP. 1974. Studies with foot-and-mouth disease virus in British deer (red, fallow and roe). Comp Pathol 84(2): 215-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9975(74)90062-0
  6. Forman AJ, Gibbs EP, Baber DJ, Hemiman KA, Barnett IT. 1974. Studies with foot-and-mouth disease virus in British deer (red, fallow and roe). II. Recovery of virus and serological response. J Comp Palhol 84(2): 221-229.
  7. Gibbs EP, Herniman KA, Lawman MJ. 1975. Studies withfoot-and-mouth disease virus in British deer (muntjac and sika). Clinical disease, recovery of virus and serological response. Comp Pathol 85(3): 361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9975(75)90022-5
  8. Gibbs EP, Herniman KA, Lawman MJ, Sellers RF. 1975. Foot-and-mouth disease in British deer: transmission of virus to cattle, sheep and deer. Vet Rec 96(26): 558-563. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.96.26.558
  9. McVicar JW, Sutmoller P, Ferris DH, Campbell CH. 1974. Foot-and-mouth disease in white-tailed deer: clinical signs and transmission in the laboratory. Proc Annu Meet U S Anim Health Assoc 78: 169-180.
  10. Pinto AA. 2004. Foot-and-mouth disease in tropical wildlife. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1026: 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1307.008
  11. Rhyan J, Deng M, Wang H, Ward G, Gidlewski T, McCollum M, Metwally S, McKenna T, Wainwright S, Ramirez A, Mebus C, Salman M. 2008. Foot-and-mouth disease in North American bison (Bison bison) and elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni): susceptibility, intra-and inter-species transmission, clinical signs, and lesions. J Wildl Dis 44(2): 269-279.
  12. Rhyan JC, Spraker TR. 2010. Emergence of diseases from wildlife reservoirs. Vet Pathol 47(1): 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985809354466
  13. Sutmoller P, Barteling SS, OIascoaga RC, Sumption KJ. 2003. Control and eradication of foot-and-mouth disease. Virus Res 91(1): 101-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1702(02)00262-9
  14. Thomson GR, Vosloo W, Bastos AD. 2003. Foot and mouth disease in wildlife. Virus Res 1(1): 145-161.
  15. United States Department of Agriculture. 1994. Foot and mouth disease: Sources of out-breaks and hazard categorization of modes of virus transmission. Fort Collins: United States Department of Agriculture, Centers for epidemiology and animal health.