The Moderating Effect of Media Synchronicity in the Communication Media Use and Knowledge Creation

  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Social communications using information and communication technologies (ICT) for social interactions have been making a significant impact on task performance in organizations. However, most of the existing studies on ICT (e.g., telephone and email) have only focused on technical improvement of communication efficiencies (e.g., information exchange and storage). In this paper, we claim that ICT may be another alternative source of knowledge creation that enables employees to work, find solutions, and achieve their goals faster and better. We investigate the impact of ICT in terms of both tasks and social aspects with knowledge creation as task performance. Also, we investigate the moderating effect of media synchronicity on these relationships. This study contributes to the understanding of contemporary communications media usage and its performance in organizations. We collected and analyzed survey data of 248 company employees, using PLS. The results indicate that task urgency and social influence directly affect ICT usage, and even knowledge creation. Also the media synchronicity moderates the relationship between the characteristics of a given task and ICT usage and the relationship between ICT usage and knowledge creation. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are also discussed in the paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, B., Brynin, M., Gershuny, J., and Raban, Y., Information and Communication Technologies in Society, Rutledge, London, 2007.
  2. Brown, J., Broderick, A.J., and Lee, N., "Word of Mouth Communication within Online Communities: Conceptualizing the Online Social Network," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 21, No.3, 2007, pp. 2-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20082
  3. Carlson, J.R and Zmud, RW., "Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No.2, 1999, pp. 153-170. https://doi.org/10.2307/257090
  4. Carlson, P.J. and Davis, G.B., "An Investigation of Media Selection among Directors and Managers: From 'Self' to 'Other' Orientation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No.3, 1998, pp. 335-362. https://doi.org/10.2307/249669
  5. Carney, R.N. and Levin, J.R, "Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students' Learning from Text," Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 14, No.1, 2002, pp. 5-26. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013176309260
  6. Chin, W.W., "Frequently Asked Questions-Partial Least Squares and PLS-Graph," updated December 21, 2004; available online at http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfaq/ plsfaq.htm; accessed February 19, 2010.
  7. Daft, R.L. and Lengel, R.H., "Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design," Management Science, Vol. 32, No.5, 1986, pp. 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  8. Dennis, A.R. and Kinney, S., "Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality," Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No.3, 1998, pp. 256-274. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256
  9. Dennis, A.R. and Valacich, J.S., "Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity," in Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences (IEEE), Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 1999.
  10. Dennis, A.R, Fuller, R.M., and Valacich, J.S., "Media, Tasks, and Communication Process: A Theory of Media Synchronicity," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, No.3, 2008, pp. 575-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
  11. Fornell, C, A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis Methods, Praeger, New York, NY, 1982.
  12. Fulk, J. and Boyd, B., "Emerging Theories of Communication in Organizations," Journal of Management, Vol. 17, 1991, pp. 407- 446. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700207
  13. Fulk, J., Steinfield, C.W., Schmitz J., and Power, J.G., "A Social Information Processing Model of Media Use in Organizations," Communication Research, Vol. 14, 1987, pp. 529-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005005
  14. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M-C, "Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice," Communications of the AIS, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2000, pp. 1-79.
  15. Hansen, M.T., "The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, No, 1, 1999, pp. 82-111.
  16. Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Staples, D.S., "The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants," Journal of Strategic Information System, Vol. 9, 2000, pp. 129-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1
  17. Jiang, Z. and Benbasat, I., "The Effects of Presentation Formats and Task Complexity on Online Consumers' Product Understanding," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2007, pp. 475-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148804
  18. Kahai, S.S. and Cooper, R.B., "Exploring the Core Concepts of Media Richness Theory: The Impact of Cue Multiplicity and Feedback Immediacy on Decision Quality," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 20, No.1, 2003, pp. 263-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045754
  19. Keen, P.G.W., "Telecommunications and Organizational Choice," Communications Research, Vol. 14, No.5, 1987, pp. 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005008
  20. Keen, P.G.W., Competing in Time. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1988.
  21. Keen, P.G.W., Shaping the Future: Business Design Through Information Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1991.
  22. Kettinger, W.J. and Lee, C.C., "Understanding the IS-User Divide in IT Innovation," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No.2, 2002, pp. 79-84. https://doi.org/10.1145/503124.503127
  23. Lee, C.C. and Grover, V., "Exploring Mediation between Environmental and Structural Attributes: The Penetration of Communication Technologies in Manufacturing Organizations," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16, No.3, 1999, pp. 187-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1999.11518261
  24. Licoppe, C. and Smoreda, Z., "Are Social Networks Technologically Embedded? How Networks Are Changing Today with Changes in Communication Technology," Social Networks, Vol. 27, 2005, pp. 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.001
  25. Malhotra, A, Gosain, S., and El Sawy, O.A, "Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner- Enabled Market Knowledge Creation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2005, pp. 145-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148671
  26. Markus, M.L., "Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No.4, 1994, pp. 1047-7039.
  27. McKeen, J.D., Guimaraes, T., and Wetherbe, J.c., "The Relationship Between User Participation and User Satisfaction: An Investigation of Four Contingency Factors," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No.4, 1994, pp. 427-451. https://doi.org/10.2307/249523
  28. Monge, P. and Contractor, N., Theories of Communication Networks. Cambridge: Oxford University Press, 2003.
  29. Murray, S.R. and Peyrefitte, J., "Knowledge Type and Communication Media Choice in the Knowledge Transfer Process," Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol. 19, No.1, 2007, pp. 111-133.
  30. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S., "Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No.2, 1998, pp. 242-266.
  31. Nonaka, I., "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1994, pp. 14-37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  32. Paut D.L., "Collaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No.4, 2006, pp. 143-176. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222220406
  33. Reagans, R. and McEvily, B., "Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No.2, 2003, pp. 240-267.
  34. Rice, R.E., "Task Analyzability, Use of New Media, and Effectiveness: A Multi-Site Exploration of Media Richness," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No.4, 1992, pp. 475-500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.475
  35. Rice, RE., Kraut, R.E., Cool, C, and Fish, R.S., "Individual Structural and Social Influences on Use of a New Communication Medium," Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 1994, pp. 285-289.
  36. Rogers, E., Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed. Free Press, New York, 1995.
  37. Rotter, J.B., "A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust," Journal of Personality, Vol. 35, No.4, 1967, pp. 651-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x
  38. Schmitz, J. and Fulk, J., "Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use," Communication Research, Vol. 18, No.4, 1991, pp. 487-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365091018004003
  39. Sheer, V.C and Chen, L., "Improving Media Richness Theory: A Study of Interaction Goals, Message Valence, and Task Complexity in Manager-Subordinate Communication," Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 18, 2004, pp. 76-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318904265803
  40. Speier, C, Vessey, I., and Valacich, J.S., "The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance," Decision Sciences, Vol. 34, 2003, pp, 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02292.x
  41. Stone-Romero, E.F. and Anderson, L.E., "Relative Power of Moderated Multiple Regression and the Comparison of Subgroup Correlation Coefficients for Detecting Moderating Effects," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 79, No.3, 1994, pp. 354- 359. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.354
  42. Trevino, L.K., Lengel, R, and Daft, R.L., "Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective," Communication Research, Vol. 14, No.5, 1987, pp. 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014005006
  43. Trevino, L.K., Webster, J., and Stein, E.W., "Making Connections: Complementary Influences on Communication Media Choices, Attitudes, and Use," Organization Science, Vol. 11, No.2, 2000, pp. 163-182. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.2.163.12510
  44. Van de Ven, A., Delbecq, A., and Koening, R, "Determinants of Coordination Modes Within Organizations," American Sociological Review, Vol. 41, No.2, 1976, pp. 322-338. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094477
  45. Vickery, S.K., Droge, C, Stank, T.P., Goldsby, T.J., and Markland, R.E., "The Performance Implications of Media Richness in a Business-to-Business Service Environment: Direct Versus Indirect Effects," Management Science, Vol. 50, No.8, 2004, pp. 1106-1119. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0248
  46. Webster, J. and Trevino, L.K., "Rational and Social Theories as Complementary Explanations of Communication Media Choices: Two Policy-Capturing Studies," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, No.6, 1995, pp. 1544-1572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256843
  47. Zmud, RW., Lind, M.R, and Yong, F.W., "An Attribute Space for Organizational Communication Channels," Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No.4, 1990, pp. 440- 457. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1.4.440