DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Validity of New Mobile Policies in Korea

  • Yang, Je-Min (Graduate School of Information Technology & Telecommunications Inha University) ;
  • Park, Jae-Chon (Graduate School of Information Technology & Telecommunications Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2010.03.11
  • 심사 : 2010.08.09
  • 발행 : 2010.09.28

초록

The world mobile service is growing sharply and became bigger market than wired. So it is very needed to find the political way to promote mobile industry. The United States government recently decided to introduce new mobile policies for promoting mobile industry. Until now the telecommunications policies of the United States have affected policy developments for many countries including Korea. In this context, we studied the validity of introducing new mobile policies of the United States in Korea. We found that new mobile policies can cause the change of mobile market environment; mobile market power will be dispersed from network to content, application and devise, and new mobile market environment where consumers freely select and use network as well as content, application and devise will be made. Also we found empirically that if new policies are introduced in Korea, mobile industry will be promoted as Korean consumers use mobile services and goods quite actively in new mobile market. We think our results provide reasonable evidence to introduce new mobile policies in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. TIA, "TIA 2008 Telecommunications Market Review and Forecast", 2008.
  2. Cowen and Company, "Wireless Equipment Industry Outlook", 2008.
  3. Credit Suisse, "Mobile Handsets", 2008.
  4. Hazlett, T. W., "The Wireless Craze, The Unlimited Bandwidth Myth, The Spectrum Auction Faux Pas, and the Punchline to Ronald Coase's "Big Joke": An Essay on Airwave Allocation Policy", Harv. J. L. & Tech., vol. 14, no.2, 2001, pp.335-545.
  5. Lee, B. G., Kim, K. Y., Lee, C. H., Jeong, K. Y., "Analyzing Value Networks for Creating Stakeholder Values in Mobile Communications Industry", Korean Telecommunications Policy Review, vol.13, no.4, 2006, p.202.
  6. Vogelsang, I. & Mitchell, B. M., Telecommunications Competition; The Last Ten Miles, MIT Press, 1996.
  7. Mowery, D., The Practice of Technology Policy, Stoneman(ed), 1995.
  8. Baumol, W. J. & Sidak, J. G., Toward Competition in Local Telephony, MIT Press, 1994, p.9.
  9. Brick, G. W., The Telecommunications Industry: The Dynamics of Market Structure, Harvard University Press, 1981, pp.256-266.
  10. Lipman, A. D., Telecom Deregulation, 1987, pp.61-69.
  11. Musaev, E. & Bae, J., "A study on Goverments' ICTrelated Policies for Development of ICTs in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan", Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, vol.8, no.3, 2008, pp.315-336.
  12. Coase, R. H., "The Federal Communications Commission", Journal of Law and Economics, vol.2, 1959, pp.1-40. https://doi.org/10.1086/466549
  13. Coase, R. H., "The Problem of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics, vol.3, 1960, pp.1-44. https://doi.org/10.1086/466560
  14. De Vany, A., Eckert, R. D., Meyers C. J., O'Hara, D. J. & Scott, R. C., "A Property System for Market Allocation of the Electromagnetic Spectrum: A Legal-Economic-Engineering Study", Stanford Law Review, vol.21, no.6, 1969, pp.1499-1561. https://doi.org/10.2307/1227522
  15. Matheson, R. J., "Flexible Spectrum Use Rights Tutorial", Proceedings of 2005 International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technologies(ISART'05), 2005, pp.157-167.
  16. FCC, "Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking", WT Docket No.3-113, May 2003.
  17. Ofcom, "The Wireless Telegraphy(Spectrum Trading) Regulation", Dec. 2004.
  18. MIC, "Radio Waves Act.", Dec. 2005.
  19. Hazlett, T. W., Hearst, E. D., May, R. J. & Thierer, A. D., "Telecrisis: How Regulation Stifles High-speed Internet Access", Pacific Research Institute, 2003, pp.59-82.
  20. Lau, D. K. C., "Managing Radio Spectrum: Present and New Approaches", Proceedings of 2005 IEE Hong Seminar, Feb. 2005.
  21. FCC, "Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking", No.03-289, Nov. 2008.
  22. Ofcom, "Spectrum Usage Rights-Technology and Usage Neutral Access to the Radio Spectrum", Apr. 2006.
  23. Analysys, DotEcon, Hogan & Hartson, "Study on Conditions and Options for Introducing Secondary Trading of Radio Spectrum in the European Community", May 2004.
  24. FCC, "Public Notice: Auction of 700Mhz Band Licenses Closes", DA 08-595, 2005.
  25. FCC, "Second Report and Order", No. 07-132, 2007.
  26. FCC, "Second Report and Order", No. 04-186, 2008.
  27. FCC, "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking", No. 09-191, 2009.
  28. Davis, F. D, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly, vol.13, no.3, 1989, pp.319-339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  29. Adams, D. A., Nelson, R.R. & Todd, P. A., "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology : A Replication", MIS Quarterly, vol.16, no.2, 1992, pp.227-248. https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
  30. Agarwal R. & Prasad, J., "The Role if Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technology", Decision science, vol.28, no.3, 1997, pp.557-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x
  31. Lederer, A. L., Donna, J. M., Mark, P. S., & Youlong, Z., "The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web", Decision Support Systems, vol.29, 2000, pp.269-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00076-2
  32. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C., Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th Edn., Prentice Hall, 1998.
  33. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G., "Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures", Psychological Bulletin, no.88, 1980, pp.37-51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  34. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. P., "Goodness-of-Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size", Psychological Bulletin, no.103, 1988, pp.391-411.