Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repair Using Anterolateral Approach

전외측 도달법을 이용한 소절개 회전근 개 봉합술

  • Cho, Chul-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Yeo, Kyung-Ki (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Lee, Sung-Yoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Jung, Gu-Hee (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gospel Hospital, Kosin University)
  • 조철현 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 여경기 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이성윤 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 정구희 (고신대학교 복음병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.02.22
  • Accepted : 2010.05.04
  • Published : 2010.06.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce mini-open rotator cuff repair using the anterolateral approach and evaluate its clinical outcomes and effectiveness. Materials and Methods: 59 consecutive cases of rotator cuff tearing which were treated with mini-open repair utilizing the anterolateral approach were evaluated. The population comprised 39 men and 20 women, with an average age of 56.6 years. An average follow-up time period was 26 months. Clinical outcomes were analyzed based on VAS, ADL, and ASES scores. Results: The average respective VAS, ADL, and ASES scores improved from 7.04, 12.37, and 35.32 preoperatively to 1.02, 27.20, and 90.08 postoperatively (p=0.000). There were 41 excellent, 11 good, 2 fair, and 5 poor results. There were satisfactory results in 52 cases (88.1%). There were no statistically significant differences between the final ASES scores and age, sex, duration of symptoms, tear size, and preoperative stiffness (p>0.05). Conclusion: Mini-open rotator cuff repair using the anterolateral approach effective in providing better visualization.

목적: 회전근 개 파열에서의 전외측 도달법을 이용한 소절개 봉합술을 소개하고 임상적 결과 및 그 효용성을 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 전외측 도달법을 이용한 소절개 봉합술을 시행하고 1년 이상 추시 관찰이 가능하였던 59예를 대상으로 하였다. 평균 연령은 56.6 (39~71)세였고, 남자가 39예, 여자가 20예였으며, 평균 추시 기간은 26 (12~41)개월이었다. VAS 점수 및 ADL 지수를 이용하여 동통 및 기능적 평가를 시행하였고, 임상적 결과의 판정은 ASES 점수를 이용하였다. 결과: VAS 점수는 술 전 7.04점에서 최종 추시시 1.02점으로, ADL 지수는 12.37점에서27.20점으로 호전되었으며, ASES 점수는 술 전 35.32점에서 최종 추시시 90.08점으로 향상되었다(p=0.000). 임상적 결과는 우수 41예, 양호 11예, 보통 2예, 불량 5예로 52예 (88.1%)에서 만족할 만한 임상적 결과를 나타내었다. 나이, 성별, 증상 기간, 파열의 크기, 술 전 견관절 강직과 최종 추시 ASES 점수와의 통계학적 유의성은 없었다 (p>0.05). 결론: 전외측 도달법을 이용한 소절개 봉합술은 만족할 만한 임상적 결과를 보였으며 시야 확보에 유리한 술식으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung ST, Kim HS, Yoo JH, et al.: Mini-open repair in large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 9: 176-180, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2006.9.2.176
  2. Cofield RH: Current concept review. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. trophy of the deltoid muscle following rotator cuff surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67: 974-979, 1985.
  3. Duralde XA, Greene RT: Mini-open rotator cuff repair via an anterosuperior approach. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 17: 715-721, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2008.01.142
  4. Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek DW: Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy, 18: 665-670, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2002.32589
  5. Hata Y, Saitoh S, Murakami N, Kobayashi H, Takaoka K: Atrophy of the deltoid muscle following rotator cuff surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 86: 1414- 1419, 2004.
  6. Kang L, Henn RF, Tashjian RZ, Green A: Early outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a matched comparison with mini-open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy, 23: 573-582, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2007.01.011
  7. Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I: Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years’follow- up. Arthroscopy, 19: 746-754, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(03)00395-5
  8. Ko SH, Cho SD, Choe SW, et al.: The evaluation for the usefulness of arthroscopic miniopen repair which related with large and massive sized full thickness rotator cuff tear and clinical results. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 9: 83-88, 2006. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2006.9.1.083
  9. Mohtadi NG, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fletcher JA, Chan DS, Li FX: A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med, 36: 1043-1051, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508314409
  10. Morse K, Davis AD, Afra R, Kaye EK, Schepsis A, Voloshin I: Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med, 36: 1824-1828, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322903
  11. Nho SJ, Shindle MK, Sherman SL, Freedman KB, Lyman S, MacGillivray JD: Systematic review of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 3: 127-136, 2007.
  12. Park JY, Levine WN, Marra G, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU: Portal-extension approach for the repair of small and medium rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med, 28: 312-316, 2000.
  13. Pearsall AW 4th, Ibrahim KA, Madanagopal SG: The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res, 2: 24, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-2-24
  14. Richards R, An KN, Bigliani L, et al.: A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 3: 347-352, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
  15. Rhee YG, Ha JH, Lim CT, Jeong BI: Arthroscopic versus Mini-Open rotator cuff Repair: Comparison of Clinical Results. J Korean Orthop Assoc, 40: 299-304, 2005.
  16. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriisho J: Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89: 953-960, 2007. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00512
  17. Verma NN, Dunn W, Adler RS, et al.: All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair; a prospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 22: 587-594, 2006.

Cited by

  1. When Does the Quality of Life Improve after Rotator Cuff Repair? vol.48, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2013.48.4.281
  2. Anterolateral Mini-open Fixation with a Patch Augmentation for Latissimus Dorsi Tendon Transfer in Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Technical Note vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2015.18.4.269
  3. Effects of Resistance Exercise using Elastic Band on Range of Motion, Function and Shoulder Pain among Patients with Rotator Cuff Repair vol.28, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2016.28.5.491