Cobitis hankugensis-Iksookimia longicorpa Complex의 2배체, 3배체집단의 난막 미세구조

Fine Structure of Oocyte Envelopes of Diploid and Triploid Biotypes in Cobitis hankugensis-Iksookimia longicorpa Complex

  • 고명훈 (전북대학교 자연과학대학 생물과학부.생물다양성연구소) ;
  • 박종영 (전북대학교 자연과학대학 생물과학부.생물다양성연구소)
  • Ko, Meong-Hun (Faculty of Biological Sciences and Biodiversity for Institute, College of Natural Sciences, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Young (Faculty of Biological Sciences and Biodiversity for Institute, College of Natural Sciences, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2010.02.05
  • 심사 : 2010.03.12
  • 발행 : 2010.03.31

초록

기름종개와 왕종개로부터 기원한 단성생식집단인 Cobitis hankugensis-Iksookimia longicorpa complex는 대부분 암컷으로만 구성되어 있으며 최근에 1종류의 2배체와 2종류의 3배체집단이 확인되었다. 이들의 난막구조를 조사한 결과 3가지 종류로 구분될 수 있었다. 융모형은 이들의 부모종인 왕종개에서 확인되었으며, 과립형은 기름종개와 3배체집단, 그리고 과립을 가진 융모형은 2배체집단에서 나타났다. 특히 과립형을 가지는 3집단에서는 그들의 길이와 밀도에서 서로 차이를 보였다. 이러한 구조들은 cobitid complex에서 처음 보고될 뿐 아니라 2배체, 3배체 complex집단을 분류하는 데 이용될 수 있다.

The Cobitis hankugensis-Iksookimia longicorpa complex from Korea has been presumed to be a unisexual lineage, originating from C. hankugensis and I. longicorpa and having almost all females. Recently, it was confirmed that the complex consisted of one diploid and two triploid complexes. From observation of their oocyte envelopes, three forms could be classified: a villous projection in I. longicorpa, a granular one in C. hankugensis and two triploid complexes, and a granule with villous one in the diploid complex. Even within the same granular projection, they showed specific features in length and density number from each other. These architectures are first observed in cobitid complexes and may playa role in identification of diploids and triploids.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek, H.A., J.Y. Park, C.H. Kim and J.H. Kim. 2007. Development and transformation of oocyte' follicle cell for Korean four sillurid fishes of Liobagrus and Pseudobagrus (Pisces: Siluriformes). Korean J. Ichthyol., 19: 112-119. (in Korean)
  2. Blaxter, J.H.S. 1969. Development: eggs and larvae. In: Hoar, W.S., D.J. Randall and E.M. Donalson (eds.), Fish physiology III. Academic Press, New York, pp. 177-252.
  3. Britz, R., M. Kokoscha and R Riehl. 1995. The anabantoid genera Ctenops, Luciocephalus, Parasphaerichthys, and Sphaerichthys (Teleostei: Perciformes) as a monophyletic group: evidence from egg surface structure and reproductive behaviour. Japanese J. Ichthyol., 42: 71-79.
  4. Dawley, R.M. 1989. An introduction to unisexual vertebrates. In: Dawley, R.M. and J.P. Bogart (ed.). Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. Bulletin 466, New York, USA, pp. 1-11.
  5. Erickson, D.L. and E.X Pikitch. 1993. A histological description of shortspine thornyhead, Sebastolobus alascanus, ovaries: structures associated with the production of gelatinous egg masses. Env. Biol. Fish., 36: 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00001723
  6. Goddard, K.A. and R.J. Schultz. 1993. A clonal reproduction by polyploid members of the clonal hybrid species Phoxinus eos-neogaeus (Cyprinidae). Copeia, 3: 650-660.
  7. Groot, E.P. and D.F. Alderdice. 1985. Fine structure of the external egg membranes of five species of Pacific salmon and steelhead trout. Can. J. Zool., 63: 552-566. https://doi.org/10.1139/z85-082
  8. Hart, N.H., R Abraham and M. Donovan. 1984. The structure of the chorion and associated surface filaments in Oryzias; evidence for the presence of extracellular tubules. J. Exp. Zool., 230: 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402300213
  9. Hirai, A. 1993. Fine structure of the egg membrane in four species of Pleuronectinae. Japanese J. Ichthyol., 40: 227-235.
  10. Janko, K., P. Rab, M.A. Culling and P. Kotlik. 2005. Ice age cloning-comparison of quaternary evolutionary histories of sexual and clonal forms of European loaches (Cobitis: Teleostie) using the analysis of mitochondrial DNA variation. Mol. Ecol., 14: 2991-3004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02583.x
  11. Johnson, E.Z. and R.G. Werner. 1986. Scanning electron microscopy of the chorion of selected freshwater fishes. J. Fish. Bio., 29: 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb04943.x
  12. Ko, M.H. 2009. Reproductive mechanisms of the unisexual diploid-triploid hybrid complex between the spined loach Cobitis hankugensis and Iksookimia longicorpa (Teleostei, Cobitidae) in Korea. Unpul. Doctoral Thesis. Chonbuk National Univ. l60pp. (in Korean with English abstract).
  13. Kim, I.S. and E.H. Lee. 1995. Interspecific hybridization between triploid hybrid fish, Cobitis sinensis-longicorpus and two diploid species from Korea. Korean J. Ichthyol., 7: 71-78.
  14. Kim, I.S. and E.H. Lee. 2000. Hybrization experiment of diploid-triploid cobitid fishes, Cobitis sinensis-longicorpus complex (Pisces: Cobitidae). Folia Zool., 49(1): 17-22.
  15. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park. 1995. Adhesive membranes of oocyte in Korean cobitid species (Pisces, Cobitidae). Korean J. Zool., 38: 212-219.
  16. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park. 1996. Adhesive membrane of oocyte in four loaches (Pisces: Cobitidae) of Korea. Korean J. Zool., 39: 198-206.
  17. Laale, H.W. 1980. The perivitelline space and egg envelopes of bony fishes; a review. Copeia, 1980: 210-226. https://doi.org/10.2307/1443999
  18. Park, J.Y. and I.S. Kim. 1997. Egg membrane in five cobitid species of Cobitis (Pisces: Cobitidae). Korean J. Ichthyol., 9: 121-129.
  19. Park, J.Y. and I.S. Kim. 2001. Fine structure of oocyte envelopes of the related 3 cobitid species in the genus Iksookimia (Pisces, Cobitidae). Ichthyol. Res., 48: 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-001-8118-5
  20. Park, J.Y. and I.S. Kim. 2003. Variability of egg envelopes in Korean spined loaches (Cobitidae). Folia Biologica, 51(supplement): 187-192.
  21. Riehl, R. and H. Greven. 1990. Electron microscopical studies on oogenesis and development of egg envelopes in two viviparous teleosts, Heterandria formosa(Poeciliidae) and Ameca splenens (Goodeidae). Zool. Beitr., 33: 247-252.
  22. Riehl, R. and H. Greven. 1993. Fine structure of egg envelopes in some viviparous goodeid fishes, with comments on the relation of envelope thinness to viviparity. Can. J. Zool., 71: 91-97. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-014
  23. Saitoh, K., I.S. Kim and E.H. Lee. 2004. Mitochondrial gene introgression between spined loaches via hybridogenesis. Zool. Sci., 21: 795-798. https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.21.795
  24. Thiaw, O.T. and X. Mattei. 1996. Ultrastructure of the secondary egg envelope of Cyprinodontidae of the genus Epiplatys Gill, 1862 (Pisces, Teleostei). Acta Zool., 77: 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1996.tb01260.x
  25. Vasil'ev, V.P., E.B. Lebedeva, E.D. Vasil'eva and E.S. Levenkova. 2005. A unique diploid-tetraploid unisexual-bisexual fish complex (Pisces, Cobitidae). Doklady Biological Science, 404: 364-366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10630-005-0137-3
  26. Vrijenhoek, R.C., R.M. Dawley, C.J. Cole and J.P. Bogart. 1989. A list of the known unisexual vertevrats. In: Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. In: Dawley, R.M. and J.P. Bogart (eds.). Evolution and ecology of unisexual vertebrates. Bulletin 466, New York, USA, pp. 19-23.
  27. Yorke, M.A. and D.B. McMillan. 1979. Nature and cellular origin of the adhesive coats of the lamprey egg (Petromyzon marinus). J. Morphol., 162: 313-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051620303