The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The efficacy evaluation of $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium in dental implant placement

임플란트 식립 환자의 $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium 투여 효과에 대한 임상연구

  • Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Se-Won (Oscotec Incorporation) ;
  • Cho, In-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 최유성 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김은경 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 김세원 ((주) 오스코텍 연구소) ;
  • 조인호 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2010.03.24
  • Accepted : 2010.04.07
  • Published : 2010.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in bone density and reduction of time consumed for osteogenesis by $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium and to find out efficacy of $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium by comparing the group prescribed with $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium with the group without $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium prescription. Material and methods: The experimental group of 18 patients with 25 dental implant placement and the control group of 7 patients with 9 dental implant placement were randomly selected from the patients who visited prosthetic department of Dankook University Dental Hospital since July, 2006 (IRB Number ; 20060710). The experimental group was instructed to take $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium for 6 months after the implant surgery while the control group was instructed not to. Both experimental and control group were assigned for measurement using $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor and $Periotest^{(R)}$ and radiographic examination was performed using specifically manufactured Aluminum Step Wedge. The results were compared and analyzed. Results: 1. According to the $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor measurement, both the experimental and control group showed increase in values as time elapses and the experimental group showed significantly higher rate of increase (P < .05). 2. According to the $Periotest^{(R)}$ measurement, both the experimental and control group showed decrease in values as time elapses. In addition, greater decrease can be seen in the experimental group but no statistical significance was found. 3. By examining the radiographic images, both the experimental and control group showed tendency of increase in bone density. In addition, greater increase can be seen in the experimental group but no statistical significance was found. Conclusion: Clinically, taking $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium medicine for a long period of time after implant placement is expected for a better prognosis.

연구목적: 본 연구에서는 건강기능식품인 $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 임플란트 식립 환자에게 투여하고, 투여하지 않은 군과 비교하여 그 유효성과 안정성을 평가하여 투여 후 골밀도의 변화 및 골유착 기간의 단축 여부를 평가하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법 임플란트 식립 후에Post$PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 투여한 실험군은 18명의 환자를 대상으로 25개의 임플란트를 식립하였고, 투여하지 않은 대조군에서는 7명의 환자에게 9개의 임플란트를 식립하여 관찰하였다. 일차수술 후, 이차수술 후, 6개월 후에 $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor, $Periotest^{(R)}$를 이용하여 임플란트 안정성을 비교 분석하였고, 일차수술후, 1, 3, 6개월 후에 방사선 사진 촬영을 시행하여 임플란트 주위 골밀도를 측정하여 비교 분석하였다. 결과:1. $Osstell^{TM}$ Mentor의해 측정된 ISQ 값은 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 수치가 높아지는 경향을 보였다. 실험군의 측정값이 대조군에 비해 더 높은 수치를 보였으며, 식립 6개월 후에 실험군과 대조군 간에 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 관찰되었다 (P< .05); 2. $Periotest^{(R)}$ 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 수치가 낮아지는 경향을 보였으며, 실험군이 대조군에 비해 더 낮은 수치를 나타내었으나 각 군간에 통계적인 유의성은 없었다. 3. 골밀도 측정 결과 시간이 경과함에 따라 실험군, 대조군 모두 골밀도 수치가 증가하는 경향을 보였으며, 실험군이 대조군에 비해 더 높은 수치를 나타내었으나 각 군간에 통계적인 유의성은 없었다. 결론:임상적으로 임플란트 식립 후 환자가 $PostPlant^{TM}$ Calcium을 장기간 복용하는 것이 임플란트 안정성을 높이고, 골유착을 성공적으로 이루는데 도움을 줄 수 있다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Oh KO, Kim SW, Kim JY, Ko SY, Kim HM, Baek JH, Ryoo HM, Kim JK. Effect of Rehmannia glutinosa Libosch extracts on bone metabolism. Clin Chim Acta 2003;334:185-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-8981(03)00238-9
  2. Kim HM, An CS, Jung KY, Choo YK, Park JK, Nam SY. Rehmannia glutinosa inhibits tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-l secretion from mouse astrocytes. Pharmacol Res 1999;40:171-6. https://doi.org/10.1006/phrs.1999.0504
  3. Hazuda DJ, Strickler J, Kueppers F, Simon PL, Young PR. Processing of precursor interleukin 1 beta and inflammatory disease. J Biol Chem 1990;265:6318-22.
  4. Stashenko P, Dewhirst FE, Peros WJ, Kent RL, Ago JM. Synergistic interactions between interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor, and lymphotoxin in bone resorption. J Immunol 1987;138:1464-8.
  5. Park SW, Cho IH. The effect of $PRF^{{\circledR}}$ on the osseointegration and stability of implant. MS thesis 2005, Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Dankook University.
  6. Kang SJ, Cho IH, Shin SY. The effect of OPB-$K^{{\circledR}}$ on the osseointegration and stability of implant. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:107-20.
  7. $Br{\aa}nemark$ PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Halle'n O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  8. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90344-1
  9. Roodman GD. Advances in bone biology: the osteoclast. Endocr Rev 1996;17:308-32.
  10. Masuda T, Salvi GE, Offenbacher S, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:472-85.
  11. Jung H, Kim HJ, Hong S, Kim KD, Moon HS, Je JH, Hwu Y. Osseointegration assessment of dental implants using a synchrotron radiation imaging technique: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:121-6.
  12. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:221-9.
  13. $Oliv\'{e}$ J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:390-400.
  14. Teerlinck J, Quirynen M, Darius P, van Steenberghe D. Periotest: an objective clinical diagnosis of bone apposition toward implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:55-61.
  15. Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:437-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00818.x
  16. Huang HM, Lee SY, Yeh CY, Lin CT. Resonance frequency assessment of dental implant stability with various bone qualities: a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:65-74. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130108.x
  17. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  18. Johansson C, Albrektsson T. Integration of screw implants in the rabbit: a 1-year follow-up of removal torque of titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2:69-75.
  19. Johansson CB, Sennerby L, Albrektsson T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of bone tissue reactions to commercially pure titanium and Vitallium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:437-41.
  20. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, de Wijn JR, Klein CP, de Groot K, Rozing PM. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:119-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820260111
  21. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  22. Glauser R, Sennerby L, Meredith N, Re'e A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:428-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x
  23. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  24. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:493-8, 500, 502; quiz 504.
  25. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  26. Rasmusson L, Meredith N, Sennerby L. Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:316-22. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080410.x
  27. Chai JY, Yamada J, Pang IC. In vitro consistency of the Periotest instrument. J Prosthodont 1993;2:9-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00374.x
  28. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:221-9.
  29. $Br{\aa}nemark$ PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985, p.199-209.

Cited by

  1. The effect of PostGraft™ on implants were installed at the tibia of ovariectomized rats vol.49, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2011.49.4.300