Health-related Quality of Life Assessment by Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Mental Health among Seoul Citizens

서울시 지역주민의 인구사회적 특성과 정신건강상태에 따른 건강관련 삶의 질

  • Sohn, Ae-Ree (Division of Health Management, Sahmyook University) ;
  • Yoon, Ju-Tak (Graduate School of Health Sciences and Social Welfare) ;
  • Ko, Seung-Duk (Department of Health Management, Hyupsung University) ;
  • Chun, Sung-Soo (Division of Health Management, Sahmyook University)
  • 손애리 (삼육대학교 보건관리학) ;
  • 윤주탁 (삼육대학교 보건복지대학원) ;
  • 고승덕 (협성대학교 보건관리학과) ;
  • 천성수 (삼육대학교 보건관리학)
  • Received : 2010.11.22
  • Accepted : 2010.12.11
  • Published : 2010.12.30

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to estimate the health-related quality of life using EQ5-D by socio-demographic characteristics and mental health among Seoul citizens for developing health promotion programs. Methods: The study subjects using cluster-stratified sampling method were 1234 adults over 19 years old from 17 dong, S-Ku in Seoul City. A cross-sectional study with face-to-face interview was used to collect data. A questionnaire measuring socio-demographic variables, Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) and Euroqol EQ-5D instrument. The Difference on the EQ-5D index among groups were tested with Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis test. Results: The mean EQ-5D index for all subjects was 0.946(${\pm}0.105$). The EQ-5D index were significantly different by sex, age, marital status, eduction level and income. The EQ5-D indexes among clinical mental health groups were the lowest scores and significantly different from other groups. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the future intervention of health promotion programs should be carefully designed and tailored by socio-demographic variables. Especially, the mental health programs need to be developed.

Keywords

References

  1. 강은정, 박혜자, 조민우, 신호성, 김나연. EQ-5D를 이용한 건강수준의 가치 평가. 보건경제와 정책연구. 2006;12(2):19-43.
  2. 고려대학교 부설 행동과학연구소. 심리척도 핸드북. 학지사.1999;383-387.
  3. 구미시정신보건센터. 구미시지역사회정신보건사업 실행보고서, 구미시정신보건센터. 2008.
  4. 권석만, 김선영, 이주실, 고운영. 한국 남성 HIV 감염자의 정신건강 상태 및 관련된 요인. 한국심리학회지 임상. 2001;20:219-227.
  5. 길선령, 이상일, 윤성철, 안형미 등. 우리나라 성인에서 일부질환과 연관된 건강관련 삶의 질 감소. 예방의학회지.2008;41(6):434-441.
  6. 김재환, 김광일. 간이정신진단검사의 한국판 표준화연구 III.정신건강연구. 1984;2:278-309.
  7. 남해성, 김건엽, 권순석, 고광욱, Poul Kind. 삶의 질 조사도구(EQ-5D)의 질 가중치 추정 연구 보고서. 질병관리본부,2007.
  8. 박상규, 이병하. 빈곤층의 심리적 특성에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지: 상담 및 심리치료. 2004;20:813-824.
  9. 보건복지부. 국민건강영양조사 제3기 조사결과 심층분석 연구-건강면접 및 보건의식부문. 서울:보건복지부/질병관리본부, 2007.
  10. 성상석, 최찬범, 성윤경, 박용육 등. 한국인에서 EQ-5D를 이용한 건강 관련 삶의 질 측정. 대한류마치스학회지. 2004;11(3):254-262.
  11. 이영훈, 최진수, 이정애, 류소연 등. EuroQol-5 Dimension 한국가중치 모형의 적용 연구. 보건교육, 보건증진학회지.2009;26(1):1-12.
  12. 이현송. 소득이 주관적 삶의 질에 미치는 영향. 한국인구학.2000;27(1):91-118.
  13. 조민우, 이상일. 시간교환법을 이용한 일부 EQ-5D 건강상태의질 가중치 측정. 예방의학회지. 2007;40(2):169-176.
  14. 최익수, 안병주, 전병훈, 장신순 등. 이명환자에 있어서 간이정신진단 검사를 이용한 심리분석. Korean J Otolaryngol.2003;46:475-480.
  15. 한미아, 류소연, 박 종, 김명근 등. 일부 농촌지역 성인에서 EQ-5D를 이용한 건강관련 삶의 질. 예방의학회지.2008; 41(3):173-180.
  16. Badia X, Schiaffino A, Alonso J, Herdman M. Using the EuroQol 5-D in the Catalan general population: feasibility and construct validity. Qual Life Res 1998;7(4):311-322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008894502042
  17. Charro FD, Kind P, Van Hout BA, Badia X. Developing an improved measure of health outcomes: EQ-5D in transition. ISPOR 13th Annual International Meeting, 2008 May 3-7; Sheraton Centre Toronto, Canada.
  18. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990;16(3):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
  19. Jo MW, Yun SC, Lee SI. Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D health states with the time trade-off method in South Korea. Value Health 2008;11(7):1186-1189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00348.x
  20. Kim Myuong-Hee, Cho Young-Shin, Uhm Wan-Sik, Kim Sehyun, Bae Sang-Cheol. Cross-culture adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the EQ-5D in patients with rheumatic disease. Qual Life Res 2005;14:1401-1406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-5681-z
  21. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variation in population health status: Results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316(7133):736-741. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7133.736
  22. Nordlund A, Ekberg K, Kristenson M. EQ-5D in a general population survey--a description of the most commonly reported EQ-5D health states using the SF-36. Qual Life Res 2005 May;14(4):1099-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-3062-2
  23. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003
  24. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N, Nishimura S, Sakai I, Fukuda T, Hamashima C, Hisashige A, Tamura M. Estimating an EQ-5D population value set: the case of Japan. Health Econ 2002 Jun;11(4):341-353. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.673