The Sensation Seeking Tendency and the Fashion Exploratory Behavior according to the Difference Age

차이연령에 따른 감각추구 성향과 패션 탐색적 행동

  • 홍금희 (신라대학교 패션산업학부)
  • Published : 2010.01.31

Abstract

To pursue youth and agelessness can be regarded as a global trend today. The younger a woman recognizes herself to be, the more sensation seeking tendency and the more active fashion exploratory behavior of younger generation she would show. This study attempted to empirically examine the relationship between sensation seeking behavior and fashion exploratory behavior according to the difference age in women in their 30's to 50s'. After the survey, a total of 480 questionnaires was used for data analysis. The results of this study are as follows, 1. It was found that there was a very high correlation among cognitive ages, and the lower cognitive age a woman had, the higher difference age she showed. 2. Sensation seeking tendency of adult women was shown in two factors of change seeking and artistic sensation seeking, and these factors accounted for 73.99% of the total variances. Fashion exploratory behavior had 4 factors such as fashion leadership, behavior of hedonic shopping, behavior of clothing communication and behavior of clothing purchase with taking a risk, and these four factors accounted for 75.87% of the total variances. 3. The higher difference age and the higher tendency of sensation seeking an adult woman had, the higher fashion exploratory behavior was shown, and the higher the difference age, the higher tendency of change seeking and artistic sensation seeking.

Keywords

References

  1. LG 경제연구소 (2005). 2010 대한민국 트렌드. 서울: 한국경제신문사. pp. 105-106.
  2. 서찬주, 류제은 (2008). 차이연령으로 살펴본 '상그릴라 신드롬'의 선행변수와 결과변수. 소비문화연구. 11(1). pp. 121-141.
  3. '4050대반란' 아저씨들이 젊게 사는 비법 (2008. 2. 2). 조인스, 자료검색일 2009.5.15 자료출처. http://www.joins.com
  4. Barak. B.. Mathur. A, Lee, K.. & Zhang, Y. (2001). Perceptions of age-identity: Across-cultural inner-age exploration. Psychology & Marketing. 18(10). pp. 1003-1029. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1041
  5. Chua, C.. Cote, J. A., & Leong, S. M. (1990). The antecedents of cognitive age. Advances in Consumer Research. 17, pp. 880-885.
  6. Barak. B., Mathur. A.,. Lee, K., & Zhang, Y. (2001). Perceptions of age-identity: Across-cultural inner-age exploration. Psychology & Marketing. 18(10). pp. 53-58.
  7. 홍성태, 강동균, 김미준 (2007). 인지연령: 소비행동에 미치는 영향 및 매개효과 분석. 소비자학 연구, 18(3), pp. 63-84.
  8. 김정실 (2007). 뉴실버 여성 소비자의 지각연령에 따른 의복구매행동 연구. 라이프 스타일과 쇼핑성향을 중심으로, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. pp. 1-142.
  9. 김정실 (2007). 뉴실버 여성 소비자의 지각연령에 따른 의복구매행동 연구. 라이프 스타일과 쇼핑성향을 중심으로, 숙명여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문. pp 136-142.
  10. 정유진 (1998). 소비자의 감각추구성향이 의복에 대한 탐색적 행동에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. pp. 1-98.
  11. 변정선, 이선재. (2001). 20대 여성의 감각추구 성향과 의복태도가 상표다양성 추구에 미치는 영향. 복식, 51(5), pp.135-145.
  12. Kwon, Y.. & Workman. J. E. (1996). Relationship of optimum stimulation level to fashion behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 14(4). pp. 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9601400404
  13. Barak. B. & Schiffman. L. G. (1981). Cognitive age: a non-chronological age variable. Advances in Consumer Research, 8(1). pp. 602-606.
  14. Barak. B.. & Gould. S. (1985). Alternative age measures: A research agenda. Advances in Consumer Research, 12. pp. 53-58.
  15. 윤유경(2000). 주관적 연령지각과 관련 요인에 관한 개관. 한국심리학회지, 19(1), pp.61-72.
  16. Stephens. N. (1991). Cognitive age: A useful concept for advertising- Journal of Advertising. 20(4). pp. 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1991.10673353
  17. Wray. A. Z. & Hodges. N. N. (2006). Response to activewear apparel advertisements by US baby boomers: An examination of cognitive versus chronological age factors. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management. 12(1). pp. 8-23.
  18. Wilkes. R. E. (1992). A structural modeling approach to the measurement and meaning of cognitive age. Journal of Consumer Research, 19. pp. 292-301. https://doi.org/10.1086/209303
  19. Gwinner, K., & Stephens. N. (2001). Testing the implied mediational role of cognitive age. Psychology & Marketing. 18. pp. 1031-1048.
  20. 부경희 (2005). '젊은 오빠' 인식: 인지연령 인식이 노인 세대의 소비행태에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 광고학 연구, 16(1), pp. 37-66.
  21. Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality. demographics. and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 7. pp. 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1086/208815
  22. Mittelstaedt, R., Grossbart, S., Curtis, W., & Devere, S. (1976). Optimum stimulation level and the adoption decision process. Journal of Consumer Research. 3. pp. 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1086/208655
  23. Grossbart, S. L.. Mittelstaedt, R. A., & Devere, S. P. (1976). Customer stimulation needs and innovative shopping behavior: The case of recycled urban places. Advances in Consumer Research. 3, pp. 30-35.
  24. Hanna, N., & Wagle, J. S. (1988), Who is your satisfied customer- Journal of Services Marketing, 2(3), pp. 5-13.
  25. Minshall, B.. Winakor, G., & Swinney, J. (1982). Fashion preferences of males and females. risks perceived. and temporal quality of styles. Home Economics Research Journal, 10(4). pp. 369-379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X8201000408
  26. Kwon, Y., & Workman. J. E. (1996). Relationship of optimum stimulation level to fashion behavior. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14(4), pp. 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X9601400404
  27. 정유진. (1998). 소비자의 감각추구성향이 의복에 대한 탐색적 행동에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. pp. 39-88.
  28. 정유진. (1998). 소비자의 감각추구성향이 의복에 대한 탐색적 행동에 미치는 영향. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문. p. 49.
  29. 김계수 (2007). 구조방정식모형 분석. 서울: 한나래. p. 372.
  30. 정찬진, 박재옥 (1996). 노년층 소비자의 인지연령에 따른 쇼핑성향과 의류점포속성 중요도. 한국의류학회지. 20(1). pp. 28-42.