{a}$rk$\"{a}$ll Ecovillage in Sweden"> A Case Study on Residents' Involvement in Sk$\"{a}$rk$\"{a}$ll Ecovillage in Sweden

스웨덴 훼르셸 생태마을의 주민참여 실태에 관한 사례연구

  • 최정신 (가톨릭대학교 생활과학부 소비자주거학)
  • Received : 2010.09.14
  • Accepted : 2010.10.21
  • Published : 2010.12.31

Abstract

This study aims to describe actual condition of residents' involvement of Sk$\"{a}$rk$\"{a}$ll ecovillage in Sweden by in-depth interviews with five residents. This study, hopefully, could contribute to offer useful information for forming ecovillage, as well as awakening about ecovillage movement to the public in Korea. The interviews were fulfilled during spring of 2010 in G$\"{o}$teborg and Sk$\"{a}$rk$\"{a}$ll ecovillage in Sweden. The results are as follows: 1) In terms of overall residents' involvement by self-evaluation everybody agrees with that residents' involvement was quite excellent during forming stage of the village, while it has been notably decreased now in running stage. It reveals there is a gap between ideology and reality. 2) Concerning decision making method, they use majority decision instead of consensus, since only 9 households of 20 are residing there all year around, it is hardly possible to assemble all the residents in the meeting. In Accordance with problematic conflicts in the village recently, development of socialization with others and education of communication skill for residents probably could be helpful to resolve conflicts among residents in long term. 3) In terms of evaluation of ecovillage movement in Sk$\"{a}$rk$\"{a}$ll ecovillage, it is the fact that many residents live less self-sufficiently, more energy consumed than the ideology pursuits. Also, they live with close connections with conventional society. Nevertheless, the efforts they are willing to practice 3R principles (Recycle, Reuse, Reduction) have to be highly respected, if we consider its educational influence to environmental movement for the conventional society.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 카톨릭대학교

References

  1. 곽유미.조정현.최정신(2005). 독일 친환경주거 사례연구-프라이브르크 보봉 주거단지를 중심으로-. 한국주거 학회 추계학술 발표대회 논문집, 243-248.
  2. 오영식(2002). 이용자 참여에 의한 마을 만들기-태백시 상장동 학마을 사례. 청주대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  3. 조정현.최정신(2009a). 코하우징 계획을 위한 주민참여 워크숍 사례, -30-40대 주부를 대상으로-. 한국가정관리학회논문집, 27(6), 155-169.
  4. 조정현.최정신(2009b). 미국 코하우징의 주민참여 사례연구. 한국주거학회 추계학술대회 발표논문집, 27-33.
  5. 최정신(2008). 국내계획공동체 마을의 주민참여의 실태 및 특성. 한국주거학회논문집, 19(5), 93-102.
  6. 최정신(2007). 한국인 50대의 노인용 코하우징 공유공간과 공동활동에 대한 선호. 한국주거학회논문집, 18(1), 131-139.
  7. 최정신.이언 폴손(2006). 스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징의 적용과 개발. 집문당.
  8. 최정신.조재순(2006). 스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기와 생활만족도의 성별차이. 한국가정관리학회논문집, 24(1), 117-128.
  9. 최정신(2005). 스웨덴과 덴마크 노인용 코하우징 주민의 생활만족도. 한국주거학회논문집, 16(6), 149-160.
  10. 최정신(2003). 스칸디나비아 노인용 코하우징 주민의 이주동기. 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 19 (2), 129-138.
  11. 최정신(2001). 스웨덴의 환경운동과 생태건축. 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 17(4), 75-84.
  12. 한주희.최정신(2005). 맞벌이 가족을 위한 코하우징 제안-설문지를 이용한 면접조사와 모의실험을 기초로-. 대한가정학회논문집, 43(11), 73-96.
  13. 홍서정.전남일(2004). 한국 농촌형 코하우징 계획에 대한 연구. 한국주거학회 추계학술발표논문집, 117-122.
  14. Ambrose, I. (1993). Etablering af seniorbofaellesskaber, Erfaringer fratre projekter I Odense (Establish senior cohousing, lessons from projects in Odense): Statens Byggeforskningsinstitute.
  15. Birgersson, L.(2000). Konsten att Ta Sin Plats-om Skarkall I Bohuslan(The Art of Taking His Spot-on Skarkall in Bohuslän). Arkitektur, Chalmers Tekniska Ho.gskola. 10-30.
  16. Choi, J.S.(2008). Characteristics of Community Life in Foreign Intentional Communities, Focus on the Differences between Ecovillage and Cohousing. International Journal of Human Ecology 9(2), 93-105.
  17. Cho, J.H..-Lee, D.S. & Choi, J.S.(2008). Residents' Participation and Common Activities in Intentional Community: A Case of Mindlre Community. International Journal of Human Ecology. 9(2), 107-116.
  18. Choi, J. S. (2004). Evaluation of Community Planning and Life of Senior Cohousing Projects in Northern European Countries. European Planning Studies, 12(8), 1189-1216.
  19. Choi, J.S. & Paulsson, J. (2003). A Study of Life and Physical Environment of Senior Cohousing in Scandinavian Countries. Proceeding of Stockholm Symposium on Nordic Studies, 55-73.
  20. FIC(2007). Community Directory (2007). Rutlege.
  21. Dawson, J. (2006). Ecovillages, New frontiers for sustainability. Green Books Ltd. UK.
  22. Drakenberg, K..Sonnsjon, M. & Windahl, K. (1992). Det kretsar kring huset: Skätrkäll -en skissprocess med ekologisk inriktning (A Sketching Process with Ecological Intentions). Chalmers University, Goteborg.
  23. Glass, A.P.(2009). Aging in a Community of Mutual Support: The Emergence of an Elder Intentional Cohousing Community in the United States. Journal of Housing for the Elderly 23, 283-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763890903326970
  24. Jensen, S. P. (1994). Summary and conclusions of the conference on cohousing for senior citizens in europe: BiC, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8-13.
  25. Koyabe, I. (1994). Resident's participation in the design of housing, a study of the Swedish collective house Fardknakppen. PhD. Thesis, KTH, Stockholm.
  26. Kozeny, G. (1996). Intentional communities: lifestyles based on ideals, Community Catalyst Project. San Francisco, California.
  27. Kwak, Y.M..eCho, J.H..Hong, S.J. & Choi, J.S. (2007) Residents' Participation in Common Activities of an Eco-Friendly Village-A Case Study of Ansolgi Village. APNHR 2007 International Conference Proceedings, 117-118.
  28. Lucas, C. (2006). Forward of ecovillages, by Dawson, New frontiers for sustainability. Green Books Ltd. UK.
  29. Marcus, C. C. (2000). Site Planning, Building Design and a Sense of Community: an Analysis of Six Cohousing Schemes in Denmark, Sweden, and Netherlands. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 17(2), 89-119.
  30. Meltzer, G. (2000). Cohousing: Verifying the Importance of Community in the Application of Environmentalism. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 17(2), 110-132.
  31. Wann, D. (2005). Reinventing community. Fulcrum Publishing.
  32. Windahl, K. (1993). Lerjordsbygge paSkarkäll: rapport fran en introduktionskurs I lerjordsbygge (Building on Skarkäll: Report of an introductory course in clay construction). Chalmer University of Technology, Goteborg.
  33. 서울신문(2009). 06. 27. 3면.
  34. http://211.115.218.173
  35. http://hem.www.fyristorg.com~Kollektivhus och Ekobyar in Sverige
  36. www.gen-europe.org
  37. www.ic.org
  38. www.canong.or.kr
  39. www.ecovillage.or.kr
  40. www.cohousing.org