대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제48권4호
  • /
  • Pages.243-250
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

내부연결 임플란트 상부구조물에서 나사조임술식이 풀림토크값에 미치는 영향

The effect of screw tightening techniques on the detorque value in internal connection implant superstructure

  • 최정한 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과진료부 보철과)
  • Choi, Jung-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2010.06.29
  • 심사 : 2010.08.04
  • 발행 : 2010.10.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 목적: 본 연구는 잘 맞는 임플란트 상부구조물에서 서로 다른 나사조임순서와 조임방법이 나사의 풀림토크값에 미치는 영향을 평가하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 서로 수동적 적합 관계를 갖는 완전 무치악 하악 주모형과 네 개의 평행한 임플란트 (Astra Tech)에 직접 연결되는 금속구조물을 제작하였다. 금속구조물과 잘 맞는 실험모형을 위해 주모형에서 연결인상법을 이용하여 여섯 개의 경석고 모형을 얻었다. 20 Ncm로 조인 후 나사의 풀림토크값을 두 번 측정하였다. 세 가지 나사조임순서 (1-2-3-4, 2-4-3-1, 그리고 2-3-1-4)와 두 가지 나사조임방법 (two-step과 one-step)에 대한 나사의 풀림토크값과 최소풀림토크값을 유의수준 .05에서 각각 다원분산분석법 (multi-way ANOVA)과 이원분산분석법 (two-way ANOVA)을 이용하여 통계분석 하였다. 결과: 나사조임순서에 대한 나사의 평균 풀림토크값은 12.8 Ncm (2-4-3-1)에서 13.1 Ncm (2-3-1-4)의 값을 보였고, 나사조임방법에 대한 값은 13.1 Ncm (two-step)와 11.8 Ncm (one-step)였다. 나사조임순서에 대한 나사의 평균 최소풀림토크값은 11.1 Ncm (1-2-3-4)와 11.2 Ncm (2-4-3-1과 2-3-1-4)였고, 나사조임방법에 대한 값은 11.2 Ncm (two-step)와 9.9 Ncm (one-step)였다. 나사의 풀림토크값과 최소풀림토크값은 세 가지 나사조임순서 간에 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이가 없었다. 그러나 두 가지 나사조임방법 간에는 두 값 모두 통계학적으로 유의성 있는 차이가 있었다. 나사를 두 단계로 나누어 조이는 방법이 한 번에 조이는 방법보다 더 큰 풀림토크값 (P = .0003)과 더 큰 최소풀림토크 값 (P = .0035)을 보였다. 결론: 본 연구와 같은 조건하에서, 연결인상법으로 얻은 잘 맞는 임플란트 상부구조물에 있어서 나사조임순서는 나사의 풀림토크값에 영향을 미치는 중요한 요소는 아니었다. 그러나 나사를 두 단계로 나누어 조이는 방법은 한 번에 조이는 방법보다 더 큰 풀림토크값을 보였다.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of different screw tightening sequences and methods on detorque values in a well-fitting implant superstructure. Materials and methods: A fully edentulous mandibular master model and a metal framework directly connected to four parallel implants (Astra Tech) with a passive fit to each other were fabricated. Six stone casts were made with a splinted impression technique to represent a 'well-fitting' situation with the metal framework. Detorque values were measured twice after screw tightening using 20 Ncm. Detorque values and minimum detorque values for three screw tightening sequences (1-2-3-4, 2-4-3-1, and 2-3-1-4) and for two tightening methods (two-step and one-step) were analyzed using multi-way analysis of variance and two-way analysis of variance, respectively, at a .05 level of significance. Results: The mean detorque values for screw tightening sequences ranged from 12.8 Ncm (2-4-3-1) to 13.1 Ncm (2-3-1-4), and for screw tightening methods were 13.1 Ncm (two-step) and 11.8 Ncm (one-step). The mean of mimimum detorque values for screw tightening sequences were 11.1 Ncm (1-2-3-4) and 11.2 Ncm (2-4-3-1 and 2-3-1-4), and for screw tightening methods were 11.2 Ncm (two-step) and 9.9 Ncm (one-step). No statistically significant differences among three screw tightening sequences were found for detorque values and for mimimum detorque values. But, statistically significant differences between two screw tightening methods were found for two values. Two-step screw tightening method showed higher detorque value (P = .0003) and higher minimum detorque value (P = .0035) than one-step method. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the screw tightening sequence was not a critical factor for the detorque values in a well-fitting implant superstructure by the splinted impression technique. But, two-step screw tightening method showed greater detorque values than one-step method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kallus T, Bessing C. Loose gold screws frequently occur in fullarch fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants after 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:169-78.
  2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90177-E
  3. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR, Linde′n U. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-35.
  4. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implantsupported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11.
  5. Wennerberg A, Jemt T. Complications in partially edentulous implant patients: a 5-year retrospective follow-up study of 133 patients supplied with unilateral maxillary prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00091.x
  6. Ortorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of implant-supported prostheses with laser-welded titanium frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw: a 5-year follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:84-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.1999.tb00096.x
  7. Hosny M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Naert I. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:340-6.
  8. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:633-45.
  9. Bra¨gger U, Aeschlimann S, Bu¨rgin W, Ha ¨mmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:26-34. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x
  10. Gotfredsen K, Karlsson U. A prospective 5-year study of fixed partial prostheses supported by implants with machined and $TiO_2$-blasted surface. J Prosthodont 2001;10:2-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00002.x
  11. Jemt T, Henry P, Linden B, Naert I, Weber H, Wendelhag I. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous law: a 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:415-21.
  12. Andersson B, Glauser R, Maglione M, Taylor A. Ceramic implant abutments for short-span FPDs: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:640-6.
  13. Preiskel HW, Tsolka P. Cement- and screw-retained implantsupported prostheses: up to 10 years of follow-up of a new design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:87-91.
  14. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bra¨gger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:625-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01117.x
  15. Patterson EA, Johns RB. Theoretical analysis of the fatigue life of fixture screws in osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:26-33.
  16. Carr AB, Brunski JB, Hurley E. Effects of fabrication, finishing, and polishing procedures on preload in prostheses using conventional 'gold'and plastic cylinders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:589-98.
  17. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear finite element contact analysis of dental implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:655-61.
  18. Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:295-302.
  19. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-36.
  20. Martin WC, Woody RD, Miller BH, Miller AW. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:24-32. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.116230
  21. Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:268-75. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114266
  22. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-18.
  23. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Pre-load on oral implants after screw tightening fixed full prostheses: an in vivo study. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:226-33
  24. Nissan J, Gross M, Shifman A, Assif D. Stress levels for well-fitting implant superstructures as a function of tightening force levels, tightening sequence, and different operators. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:20-3. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115182
  25. Choi JH, Kim CW, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Lee SH. The effect of screw tightening sequence and tightening method on the detorque value in implant-supported superstructure. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2007;45:653-64.
  26. Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90296-O
  27. Assif D, Marshak B, Nissan J. A modified impression technique for implant-supported restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:589-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90442-1
  28. Pagniano RP, Scheid RC, Clowson RL, Dagefoerde RO, Zardiackas LD. Linear dimensional change of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90157-3
  29. Goldfogel M, Harvey WL, Winter D. Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:284-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90306-3
  30. Davis GB, Moser JB, Brinsden GI. The bonding properties of elastomer tray adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:278-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90183-9
  31. Revised American Dental Association Specification no. 19 for Nonaqueous, Elastomeric Dental Impression Materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1977;94:733-41. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1977.0334
  32. Hobo S IE, Garcia LT Chapter 9 Fully bone anchored prostheses. Osseointegration and occlusal rehabilitation. Tokyo: Quintessence; 1989, p.163-86.
  33. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Bra􀆆nemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-6.
  34. Burguete RL, Johns RB, King T, Patterson EA. Tightening characteristics for screwed joints in osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:592-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90443-X
  35. Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Sadler JP, McKay ML. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:270-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80134-9
  36. Schulte JK, Coffey J. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1997;6:28-31.
  37. Jaarda MJ, Razzoog ME, Gratton DG. Providing optimum torque to implant prostheses: a pilot study. Implant Dent 1993;2:50-2. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199304000-00010
  38. Kim NG, Kim YS, Kim CW, Jang KS, Lim YJ. The effect of abutment height on screw loosening in single implant-supported prostheses after dynamic cyclic loading. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:664-70.
  39. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
  40. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-26.