Korean Journal of Poultry Science (한국가금학회지)

The Korean Society of Poultry Science (한국가금학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Crossbred Korean Native Ducks on the Retail Cut Yield, Meat Quality, and Sensory Evaluation of Duck Meats

토종오리의 교배 조합이 오리고기의 부분육 생산수율, 육질 및 관능검사에 미치는 영향

  • 김학규 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 홍의철 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 강보석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 박미나 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 채현석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 방한태 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 서보영 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 추효준 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 나승환 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 서옥석 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원) ;
  • 황보종 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원)
  • Received : 2010.11.18
  • Accepted : 2010.12.15
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This work was carried out to investigate on the retail cut yield and the meat quality of crossbred ducks. A total of 360 pullets that were produced from 4 mating methods used in this work. Four mating method were A) native ducks (female) $\times$ native ducks (male), B) meat-type ducks (female) $\times$ native ducks (male), C) native ducks (female) $\times$ meat-type ducks (male), and D) meat-type ducks (female) $\times$ meat-type ducks (male). Ducks were bred at the flat house, and selected nine ducks with similar weights from each treatment at the certain weeks (A, B, C 8 weeks; D 6 weeks). Selected ducks were slaughtered, calculated the retail cut yield(wing, back, neck, breast, leg), analyzed the physico-chemical compositions, and tested the sensory evaluation. Wing and neck meat ratios of D treatment were lowest (P<0.05), and breast meat ratio of B treatment was high (P<0.05) compared to other treatments. pH of duck meat was no difference among treatments, fat and protein contents of B treatment was highest, and collagen contents of D treatment was highest among all treatments. Meat color and physical compositions was no difference among treatments. Juiciness of D treatment meats was highest, and there was no difference between B and D treatments. Finally, mating method of native duck and meat-type duck affected on the retail cut yield, but did not improve on the physico-chemical compositions and sensory evaluation.

본 시험은 토종오리와 육용오리의 교배 조합이 부분육 비율과 육질에 미치는 영향을 연구하기 위해 수행하였다. 토종오리와 육용오리의 교배 조합으로 발생된 4처리구의 오리 360수를 평사에서 사육하고, 일정 주령(A, B, C 8주령, D 6주령)에 도달하였을 때 각 처리구에서 암수 각각 9수씩 선별하였다. 교배 조합 방법은 토종오리(female)$\times$토종오리(male), 육용오리(female)$\times$토종오리(male), 토종오리(female)$\times$육용오리(male), 육용오리(female)$\times$육용오리(male)의 4처리구를 각각 A, B, C, D로 하였다. 선별된 개체들은 도압(屠鴨)하여 부분육 비율을 측정하고, 오리고기의 이화학적 성상과 관능검사를 실시하였다. 날개와 목 부위의 비율은 D 처리구가 가장 낮았으며(P<0.05), 가슴 부위는 B 처리구에서 가장 높았다(P<0.05). 다리 부위는 처리구간 차이가 없었으며, 부분육을 제외한 부위는 A, B, D 처리구에서 C 처리구에 비해 유의적으로 높았다(P<0.05). 오리고기의 pH는 처리구간 차이가 없었으나(P>0.05), 지방, 단백질 함량은 B 처리구가 가장 높았으며(P<0.05), 콜라겐 함량은 D 처리구가 가장 높았다(P<0.05). 오리고기의 육색과 물리학적 성상(전단력, 가열 감량, 보수력)은 처리구간 차이가 없었다(P>0.05). 오리고기의 관능검사는 다즙성에서 D 처리구가 가장 높았으나(P<0.05), B와 D 처리구 사이에는 유의적 차이가 없었다. 따라서 토종오리와 육용오리의 교배 조합은 이화학적 성상이나 관능검사의 개선 효과가 뚜렷하지 않지만 가슴육 수율 향상에 영향을 주는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn BJ, Jang K, Kin SO, Cho NC, Kook G, Choi BH, Sun SS 2001 Effect of dietary supplements of processed onion on the growth performance and carcass characteristics in ducks. Korean J Poult Sci 28(3):207-213.
  2. Ali MS, Yang HS, Jeong JY, Moon SH, Hwang YH, Park GB, Joo ST 2008 Effect of chilling temperature of carcass on breast meat quality of duck. Poultry Sci 87:1860-1867. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00194
  3. AOAC 2000 Official Method of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington DC USA P1- 43.
  4. Baeza E, Dessay C, Wacrenier N, Marhe G, Listrat A 2002 Effect of selection for improved body weight and composition on muscle and meat characteristics in Muscovy duck. Br Poult Sci 43(4):560-568. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166022000004471
  5. Carlin AF, Harrison DL 1978 Cooking and sensory methods used in experimental studies on meat. Natl Livestock and Meat Board Chicago, Illinois.
  6. Chartrin P, Meteau K, Juin H, Bernadet MD, Guy G, Larzul C, Remignon Mourot J, Duclos M, Baeza E 2006 Effects of intramuscular fat levels on sensory characteristics of duck breast meat. Poultry Sci 85:914-922. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.5.914
  7. Dryden FD, Marchello JA 1970 Influence of total lipid and fatty acid composition upon the palatability of three bovine muscles. J Anim Sci 31:36-40.
  8. Duncan DB 1955 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  9. Farhat A, Chavez ER 2000 Comparative performance, blood chemistry, and carcass composition of two lines of Penkin ducks reared mixed or separated by sex. Poultry Sci 79:460- 465. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.4.460
  10. Iwamoto H, Hara Y, Ono Y, Takahara H 1992 Breed differences in the histochemical properties of the M. iliotibialis lateralis myofibre of domestic cocks. Br Poult Sci 33:321- 328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669208417470
  11. Iwamoto H, Hara Y, Ono Y, Takahara H 1993 Breed differences in the histochemical properties of the M. M. puboischio- femoralis pars medials myofibre of domestic cocks. Br Poult Sci 34:309-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669308417587
  12. Kim HJ, Liang CY, Ju MK, Lee KH, Cho SH, Lee SK 2003 Effects of dietary germani supplementation on the meat quality of duck. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 23(3):200-208.
  13. Kurt K 1990 Colorimeteric determination of hydroxyproline as measure of collagen content in meat and products: NMKL Collaborative Study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 73(1):55.
  14. Ledward DA 1986 Post-slaughter influences on the formation metmyoglobin in beef muscles. Meat Sci 15:149-171.
  15. Lunt DK, Smith SB 1991 Wagyu beefs holds profit potential for US fee lot. Feedstuffs 19:18-23.
  16. May ML, Dikeman ME, Schalles R 1977 Longissimus muscle histological characteristics of Simmental$\times$Angus, Hereford$\times$ AnGus And Limousin×Angus crossbred steers as related to carcass composition and meat palatability traits. J Anim Sci 44:571.
  17. Ogata T, Mori M 1964 Histochemical study of oxidative enzymes in vertebrate muscle. Acta Med Okayama 18:171.
  18. Owen JE, Lawire RA 1975 The effect of an artificially induced high pH on the susceptibility of minced porcine muscle to undergo oxidative rancidity under frozen storage. J Food Technol 10(2):169-180.
  19. SAS 1999 SAS Suer Guide. release 6.11 edition. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC USA.
  20. Varadarajulu P, Cunningham FE 1971 A histological study of turkey meat as related to sensory characteristics. Poultry Sci 50:1144. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0501144
  21. Wangen RM, Skala JH 1968 Tenderness and maturity in relation to certain muscle components of White Leghorn fowl. J Food Sci 33:613-616. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1968.tb09085.x
  22. White NA, McGavin MD, Smith JE 1978 Age-relaqted changes in percentage of fiber types and mean fiber diameters of the ovine quadriceps muscles. Amer J Ver Res 39:1297.
  23. Wiebicki E, Deanherage FE 1958 Determination of water holding capacity of fresh meat. J Agr Food Chem 165:597-602.
  24. 강근호 정태철 양한술 김상호 장병귀 강희설 이덕수 이상진 주선태 박구부 2006 오리육의 포장방법이 냉장저장 중 육색과 지방산화에 미치는영향. 한국가금학회지 33(1):7-14.
  25. 국길 김정은 정광해 김재필 고홍범 이재일 김창렬 김광현 2002 죽초액의 첨가가 육용오리의 생산성 및 육질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 29(4):293-300.
  26. 김경수 이준훈 신명수 조미선 김영필 조성구 강연중 2005 Astaxanthin을 생성하는 Phaffia rhodozyma를 포함한 미생물제제의 급여가 오리의 성장과 육질에 미치는 영향. 한국가금학회지 32(2):73-80.
  27. 김병기 김영직 2001 쑥 및 게 분말의 급여가 재래종 계육의이화학적 특성에 미치는 영향. 한국동물자원과학회지 43(4):535-544.
  28. 남기택 최도영 김광경 2006 오리농업으로 생산한 유기오리사료개발과 오리육 가공기술개발. 농림부 최종보고서.
  29. 농림수산식품부 2010 오리통계자료.
  30. 임계택 이정채 정진형 정우진 김태환 2000 MS 발효 잔반사료가 청둥오리의 육질에 미치는 영향. 한국환경농학회지 19(4):332-338.
  31. 채현석 유영모 안종남 김동훈 함준상 정석근 이종문 최양일 2005 출하 일령에 따른 오리육의 수율, 물리적 특성 및지방산 조성 변화. 한국축산식품학회지 25(3):304-309.
  32. 채현석 유영모 안종남 김동훈 함준상 정석근 이종문 최양일 2006 출하 일령이 오리육의 화학적 변화에 미치는 영향. 한국축산식품학회지. 26(1):9-14.
  33. 축산기술연구소 1995 가금화된 청둥오리의 특성에 관한 연구. 시험연구보고서.
  34. 축산기술연구소 2001 표준사료성분분석법.
  35. 한국가금사양표준 2007 농림부 농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Dietary Crude Protein and Amino Acid Contents on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics in Korean Native Ducks vol.40, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2013.40.4.351
  2. Comparison of Bioactive Compounds and Quality Traits of Breast Meat from Korean Native Ducks and Commercial Ducks vol.35, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.1.114
  3. Assessment of Breed- and Sex-based Variation in Flavor-related Compounds of Duck Meat in Korea vol.42, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.42.1.41