한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information)

  • 제15권12호
  • /
  • Pages.237-245
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1598-849X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-9945(eISSN)
한국컴퓨터정보학회 (Korean Society of Computer Information)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IT기반 로봇의 수용에 관한 연구: TAM과 EDT 모형의 통합관점

Predicting IT-based Robot Adoption in Korea: By Integrating TAM and EDT

  • 투고 : 2010.11.23
  • 심사 : 2010.12.12
  • 발행 : 2010.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 TAM 모델에서의 신념변수인 지각된 유용성을 기대불일치이론에 근거하여 지각된 유용성과 기대된 유용성의 불일치정도로 개념화 하고자 한다. 이를 통해 신기술 수용에 관한 개인의 혁신성과 URC로봇의 유용성에 대한 기대불일치정도가 태도와 이용의도에 영향을 미치는 과정을 규명하고자 한다. 이를 위해 2006년과 2007년 두 차례에 걸쳐 1000가구를 대상으로 실시된 URC 시범서비스 가구를 대상으로 각각 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 두 차례 설문 모두에 응답한 설문응답을 대상으로 실증분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 개인 혁신성은 유용성의 기대불일치정도(지각된 유용성-기대된 유용성)에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤으며, 유용성의 기대불일치정도는 사용자 태도와 이용의도에 긍정적인 영향을 미쳤다. 또한 사용자 태도는 이용의도와 유의미한 수준에서 관련성이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Korea Communications Commission (KCC) has been providing the pilot service of URC(Ubiquitous Robot Companion), which is a network-based personal robot, to 1000 Korean households since 2006 to define potential users' needs and adoption behaviors. Personal innovativeness might play a critical role in adoption of URC services by users because much sophisticated and convergence technologies are incorporated into URC services. Also, defining not only perceived beliefs about URC services but also expected beliefs about them are very crucial to reduce disconfirmation between users' perception and expectation of URC services. From this point of view, this paper aimed to examine robot users' adoption behavior by considering constructs such as personal innovativeness, usefulness (perceived usefulness - expected usefulness, P-E), user attitude, and intention to use. The findings reveal that personal innovativeness is negatively related to usefulness (P-E) whereas usefulness (P-E) influences significantly and positively on user attitude. It is also shown that usefulness (P-E) and user attitude have strong positive effects on intention to use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, T., Ryu, S., and Han, I., "The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls," Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 3, pp.405–420, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2004.05.001
  2. Adams, D. A., Nelson, P. P., and Todd, P., "Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.227-248, 1992. https://doi.org/10.2307/249577
  3. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp.204-215, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  4. AL-Gahtani, S. S. and King, M., "Attitudes, satisfaction and usage: factors contributing to each in the acceptance of information technology," Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp.277-297, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492999119020
  5. Bagozzi, R. P. and Burnkrant, R. E., "Attitude Organization and the Attitude Behavior Relationship," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp.913-929, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.913
  6. Bhattacherjee, A. and Premkumar, G., "Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp.229-254, 2004.
  7. Bhattacherjee, A., "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectaion-Confirmation Model," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.351-370, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
  8. Byun, S. I., IPv6 based URC service robot, National Information Society Agency, 2006.
  9. Chaiken, S. and Stangor, C., "Attitudes and Attitude Change," Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 38, pp.575-630, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003043
  10. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.318-339, 1989.
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. D. and Warshaw, P. R., "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp.982-1003, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  12. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addision-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
  13. Fornell, C. and Larker, D. F., Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp.39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  14. Goldsmith, R. E. and Hofacker, C. F., "Measuring Consumer Innovativeness," Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.209-221, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726497
  15. Hair J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. "Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings," 5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1998.
  16. Hirschman, E., "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, pp.283-295, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1086/208816
  17. Hsieh, C. C., Kuo, P. L., Yang, S. C., and Lin, S. H., "Assessing blog-user satisfaction using the expectation and disconfirmation approach," Vol. 26, pp.1434-1444, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.022
  18. Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., and Cooed, C. D., "Scales for the Measurement of Innovativeness," Human Communication Research, Vol. 4, pp.58-65, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00597.x
  19. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, M. L., "Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-adoption and Post-adoption Beliefs," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp.183-213, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/249751
  20. Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., and Sambamurthy, V., "Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp.657-678, 2003.
  21. McGuire, W. J., "Attitudes and Attitude Change," in Hand book of Social Psychology, Chapter19, Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E.(Eds.), Random House, New York, pp.233-346, 1985.
  22. Melone, N. P., "A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research," Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp.76-91, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.1.76
  23. Midgley, D. F. and Dowling, R., "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4, pp.129-142, 1978.
  24. Nov, O. and Ye, C., "Personality and Technology Acceptance: Personal Innovativeness in IT, Openness and Resistance to Change," Proceedings of 41s tHawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.1530-1605, 2008.
  25. Nunnally J., Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
  26. Oliver, R. L., Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA, 1997.
  27. Robertson, T. S., "The Process of Innovation and the Diffusion of Innovation," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, pp.14-19, 1967. https://doi.org/10.2307/1249295
  28. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C. M. and Martinez, F. J., "Understanding e-Learning Continuance Intention: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp.683-696, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  29. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of Innovation, New York: The Free Press, 1983.
  30. Saade, R. and Bahli, B., "The Impact of Cognitive Absorption on Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use in On-line Learning: an Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Information & Management, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp.317–328, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.12.013
  31. Shih, H. P. "An empirical study on predicting user acceptance, of e-shopping on the Web," Information & Management, Vol. 41, pp.351-368, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00079-X
  32. Steiger, J. H. and Lind, J. C., Statistically Based Tests for the Number of Common Factors, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, IOWA City, IA, 1980.
  33. Sun, H. and Zhang, P., "The Role of Moderating Factors in User Technology Acceptance," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp.53-78, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
  34. Thong, J. Y., Hong, S. J., and Tam, K. Y., "The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 8, pp.799-810, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001
  35. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D., "A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test," Decision Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.451-481, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x
  36. Venkatesh, V., "Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 239–260, 1999. https://doi.org/10.2307/249753
  37. 구철모, 고창은, 이대용, 이청호, "전자상거래에서 충성 고객 가치에 대한 이해: 기대불일치이론을 중심으로," 지식경영연구, 제 9권, 제 2호, 129-149쪽, 2008.
  38. 김형일, "가상지도를 이용한 청소로봇 경로계획", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 제 14권, 제 11호, 31-40쪽, 2009.
  39. 송정범, 신수범, 이태욱, "교육용 로봇을 활용한 STEM 교육용 로봇의 활용연구, 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 제 15권, 제 6호, 81-89쪽, 2010. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2010.15.6.081