Oxygen Release from Peroxide Injected into Soil/Sediment

토양/퇴적물에 주입한 과산화물에서 발생되는 산소 배출

  • Han, Kyungmin (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hannam University) ;
  • Kim, Geonha (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hannam University)
  • 한경민 (한남대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 김건하 (한남대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2009.11.02
  • Accepted : 2009.12.12
  • Published : 2010.01.30

Abstract

Peroxide is used frequently to provide electron acceptors to aerobes for the purpose of in situ bioremediation of contaminated soil/sediment. In this study, oxygen release rate of peroxides and factors affecting on dissolution and diffusion of oxygen into pore water were evaluated. Peroxides studied in this study were magnesium peroxide ($MgO_2$), calcium peroxide ($CaO_2$), and sodium percarbonate ($Na_2CO_3{\cdot}1.5H_2O_2$). $Na_2CO_3{\cdot}1.5H_2O_2$ showed the highest oxygen release rate per unit mass and the shortest release duration time among three peroxides. A simple first-order decay model for predicting the release rate of oxygen from peroxide into pore water was presented and used to fit the experimental data. The first order oxygen release rate constants k for $MgO_2$, $CaO_2$ and $Na_2CO_3{\cdot}1.5H_2O_2$ were 0.45 /hr, 3.22 /hr and 134 /hr, respectively. If $MgO_2$ was mixed with clay, oxygen release rate was lowered significantly mainly due to limitation of contact area and diffusion, implying that oxygen can be provided to the indigenous aerobes for the extended period of time.

Keywords

References

  1. 오강호, 김주용, 고영구, 윤석태, 서구원, 박배영, 신상은, 김해경(2005). 상수수계 영산강 하상퇴적물의 지화학적 특성과 오염. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 21(5), pp. 520-527.
  2. Bohan, D. G. and Schlett, W. S. (1997). Enhanced natural bioremediation using a time release oxygen compound. In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation, 5, Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 475-480.
  3. Davis-Hoover, W. J., Murdoc, L. C., and Vesper, S. J. (1995). Bioremediation of Pollutants in Soil and Water. Philadelpfia.
  4. Kao, C. M. and Borden, R. C. (1994). Enhanced aerobic bioremediation of a gasoline-contaminated aquifer by oxygen-releasing barriers, Hydrocarbon Bioremediation, Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton Florida, pp. 262-266.
  5. McKeague, J. A. (1987). Estimating air porosity and available water capacity from soil morphology. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51 (1987), pp. 148-152. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100010032x
  6. Mitchell, J. K. (1993). Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, John Wiley&Sons, New York.
  7. Morgan, P. and Watkinson, R. J. (1992). Factors limiting the supply and efficiency of nutrient and oxygen supplements for the in situ biotreatment of contaminated soil and groundwater. Water Research, 26(1), pp. 73-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(92)90113-I
  8. Mysona, E. S. and Hughes, W. D. (1999). Remediation of BTEX in groundwater with LNAPL using oxygen releasing materials (ORM). In situ Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon and Other Organic Compounds, Battelle Press, Columbus Ohio, pp. 283-288 .
  9. Vehagen, l. J., Wetzstein, D. W., Broner, D. R., and Hudak, C.hl. (1998). Enhancing dissolved oxygen to remediate vinyl chloride in ground water. Bioremediation and Phytoremediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle Press. Columbus Ohio, pp. 27.32.
  10. Vezzulli, L., Pruzzo, C., and Fabiano, M. (2004). Response of the bacterial community to in situ bioremediation of organic-rich sediments. Marine PoIlution Bulletin, 49(9-10), pp. 740-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.05.010