DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Discrete Continuity of Information System, Knowledge System, and e-Business System

  • Received : 2010.08.19
  • Accepted : 2010.09.05
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

Since information systems are pervasive in the business and non-business areas, the issue of extending researches on information systems to knowledge systems and e-business systems is one of the most profitable topics of researches. We propose a historical, discontinuous changes introducing ambiguity in explaining and interpreting innovative nature of three paradigms of systems: information systems, knowledge systems, and e-business systems. Resorting to the historical perspective in developing ideas into meaningful themes, we proposed a discrete continuity in interpreting changes of paradigms of systems. Discrete continuity may be explained by ambiguously-shared meaningful perspectives applied to different paradigms of systems and interpretive elements of each system. The discrete continuity has been adopted to make ambiguity utilized have instrumental contribution in researches. The engrafted ambiguity in systems design, development, and use could have enduring instrumental value in interpreting the types or variants of systems in each paradigm of systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Tillquist, John, and Waymond Rodgers, "Using Asset Specificity and Asset Scope to Measure the Value of IT," Communications of the ACM, vol. 48, no. 1, January 2005, pp. 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1145/1039539.1039542
  2. Whinston, Andrew B., and Xianjun Geng, "Operationalizing the Essential Role of the Information Technology Artifact in Information Systems Research: Gray Area, Pitfalls, and the Importance of Strategic Ambiguity," MIS Quarterly, v. 28, no. 2, June 2004, pp. 149-159. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148631
  3. King, William R., "Integrating Knowledge Management Into IS Strategy," Information Systems Management, vol. 16, no. 4, Fall 1999, pp. 70-72. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43189.16.4.19990901/31206.10
  4. Nambisan, Satish, "Information Systems as a Reference Discipline for New Product Development," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 1, March 2003, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036517
  5. Baskerville, Richard, and Michael D. Myers, "Information Systems as a Reference Discipline," MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 1, March 2002, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132338
  6. Benbasat, Izak, and Robert W. Zmud, "The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 2, June 2003, pp. 153-194.
  7. Chandra, Jagdish, Salvatore T. March, Styen Mukherjee, Will Pape, R. Ramesh, H. Raghav Rao, and Ray O. Waddoups, "Information Systems Frontiers," Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 1, January 2000, pp. 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1145/323830.323847
  8. Lyytinen, Kalle, and Gregory M. Rose, "The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, December 2003, pp. 557-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036549
  9. Markus, M. Lynne, "Conceptual Challenges in contemporary IS Research," Communications of AIS, vol. 3, article 4, February 2000.
  10. Markus, M. Lynne, Ann Majchrzak, and Les Gasser, "A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes," MIS Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, September 2002, pp. 179-212.