Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety (한국식품위생안전성학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Hygiene and Safety (한국식품위생안전성학회)
권호 표지

Quality Determination of Different Wholesale Cuts of Goat Carcass at Different Ages

  • Islam, R. (Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Rahman, S.M.E. (Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Khan, M. (Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Akhter, S. (Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Hossain, M.M. (Department of Animal Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Ding, Tian (School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Jai-Moung (School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Oh, Deog-Hwan (School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2010.02.20
  • Accepted : 2010.09.07
  • Published : 2010.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to find out the nutritive value and microbial status of different wholesale cuts of goat carcass. The meat sample (4 cuts from each animal $\times$ 3 different age groups $\times$ 3 animals in each group = 36 samples) was obtained from 1-, 2-, and 3-year aged goats. The whole sale cuts were shoulder, rack, loin and leg of each goat carcass. To assess the quality of meat sample, the general appearance, color, smell, juiciness, proximate composition, pH, total bacteria, coliform bacteria, and yeast were studied. The mean pH value of different cuts ranges from 5.65-5.69 didn't differ significantly, but due to age differences the pH values (5.59-5.74) differed significantly (p < 0.01). The values of juiciness in different ages ranged from 32.24-42.10% which differed significantly (p < 0.01). The marbling of the cuts of rack portion was more pronounced than that of other cuts. The ranges of crude protein (CP) content of goat carcass (20.78-27.71%) differed significantly (p < 0.01) and leg portion contained higher CP than other portion. Fat contents of different cuts ranged from 2.66-11.47% differed significantly (P < 0.01). The moisture content of the carcass differed significantly which ranged from 69.20-73.31%. The ash content of the cuts of 1-year aged groups (0.99 $\pm$ 0.13%) was higher than that of other age groups and differed significantly (P < 0.01). The calcium (Ca) content did not differ significantly. The phosphorus (P) content was higher in one year old goat (0.15 $\pm$ 0.03%) than that of the goats of other ages. The total viable count (TVC) content of microorganisms ranging from 5.05-5.15 log cfu/g at different ages did not differ significantly. The coliform count (CC) of different cuts differed significantly (P < 0.01) which ranged from 2.56-3.05 log cfu/g; it also differed significantly (P < 0.05) in different ages (2.79-2.84 log cfu/g) and was higher in 1 year old goat carcass. The yeast count differed significantly in different cuts (P < 0.01) and ages (P < 0.05). From the study it is concluded that the age and different wholesale cuts have direct influence on quality of goat carcass.

본 연구는 도매상에서 판매하고 있는 염소육의 영양학적 및 미생물학적 품질을 평가하기 위하여 수행하였다. 시료는 1년생, 2년생, 3년생 염소육을 대상으로 수행하였으며, 각 연령별에서 3마리씩 4부분의 다른 부위(어깨, 목, 허리, 다리)를 선정하여 총 36점을 대상으로 본 실험을 수행하였다. 염소육의 품질을 평가하기 위하여 각 시료의 외형, 색, 냄새, 육즙, 일반조성분, pH, 총균수, 대장균군과 효모수를 측정하였다. 각 부위별 염소육의 pH는 평균적으로 5.647-5.692로 나타내어 각 부위별 염소육의 pH는 유의적 차이가 나타나지 않은 반면 연령별 염소육의 pH는 5.585-5.743로 유의적 차이(p < 0.01)를 나타냈다. 각 연령별 염소육의 육즙함량은 32.24-42.10%로 유의적인 차이(p < 0.01)를 나타내었으며, 마블링은 다른 부위보다 목살부위에서 더 명확하게 확인할 수 있었다. 염소육의 단백질 함량은 20.78-27.71%의 결과로 유의적 차이(p < 0.01)를 나타내었고, 다리부위는 다른 부위에 비하여 높은 단백질 함량을 나타내었으며 각 부위별 염소육의 지방 함량은 2.657-11.469%로 유의적인 차이(P < 0.01)를 나타냈다. 염소육의 수분함량은 69.20-73.31%, 1년생 염소육의 회분함량은 0.989 $\pm$ 0.129%로 다른 연령대의 염소육보다 높은 것으로 나타났으며 이 결과 또한 유의적인 차이(P < 0.01)를 나타내었다. 칼슘의 함량은 유의적인 차이를 나타내지 않은 반면 1년생 염소육의 인의 함량은 0.149 $\pm$ 0.0251%로 다른 년생의 염소고기에 비하여 높은 것으로 나타냈다. 연령별 염소육의 총균수 수준은 5.05-5.15 log cfu/g으로써 유의적 차이를 나타내지 않은 반면 각 부위별 염소육의 대장균군의 오염수준은 2.56-3.05 log cfu/g으로 유의적인 차이(P < 0.01)를 나타냈다. 연령별 염소육 또한 대장균군 오염수준은 2.79-2.84 log cfu/g으로써 유의적인 차이(P < 0.05)를 나타냈으며 1년생 염소육의 대장균 오염 수준은 다른 연령의 염소육에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다. 효모의 오염수준 또한 각 부위별(P < 0.01), 연령별(P < 0.05)로 유의적인 차이를 나타내었다. 결론적으로 염소육의 영양학적, 미생물학적 품질은 염소의 연령과 판매 부위에직접적인 영향을 받는 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Devendra, C.: Goat production. An international perspective. In: Proc. International Goat Production Symp. Oct. 22-25, 1990. Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL. (1990).
  2. USDA. Composition of foods: lamb, veal and game products- raw, processed, prepared. Agriculture Handbook 8-17. Washington DC, USA: USDA Human Nutrition Information Service. (1989).
  3. USDA. Composition of foods: beef products-raw, processed, prepared. Agriculture Handbook No. 8-13. Washington DC, USA: USDA Human Nutrition Information Service. (1990).
  4. USDA. Composition of foods: pork products-raw, processed, prepared. Agriculture Handbook No. 8-10. Washington DC, USDA: USDA Human Nutrition Information Service. (1992).
  5. DLS, Expansions and activities. Department of Livestock Services, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh. Annual Report. (1997).
  6. FAO, FAO Production year Book. 1994. Food and Agricultural organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Vol. 51. (1997).
  7. Pal, U.K. and Agnihotri, M.K.: Goat. Promising meat animal in India. Asian livestock. XXI (9): 97-101. (1996).
  8. Rahman, M. M.: Fundamentals of Meat Hygiene. Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. Bismillah Farming and Frozen meat Ltd. Dhaka., pp. 76-101. (2001).
  9. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) Official Methods of Analysis Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th Ed. Arlington, VA. (1984).
  10. Olsen, S.R., Sommers, L.E.: Phosphorus. In Methods of soil analysis. American Soc. of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 403-427. (1982).
  11. APHA (American Public Health Association). Science 14 May 1976. Vol. 192 (1240). pp. 650-653. (1976).
  12. Tirupal, R. N. and Sreenivas, R. M.: The effect of postmortem ageing temperature on certain quality characteristics of mutton. Indian journal of Animal Science. 68(12), 1295 (1998).
  13. Cross, H.R., Durland, P.R., Seidman, S.C.: Sensory qualities of meat. In: Bechtel, P.J. (Ed.), Muscle as Food. Food Science and Technology Series. Academic Press, New York, pp. 279-320. (1986).
  14. Forrest, J.C., Aberle, E.D., Hendrick, H.B., Judge, M.D., Merkel, R.A.: Meat as food. In: Principles of Meat Science. WH Freeman and Company, New York, pp. 3-7. (1975).
  15. Pike, M.I., Smith, G.C., Carpenter, Z.L.: Palatability ratings for meat from goats and other meat animal species. J. Anim. Sci. 37 (269) (abstract 159). (1973).
  16. Schonfeldt, H.C., Naude, R.T., Bok, W., Van Heerden, S.M., Swoden, L., Boshoff, E.: Cooking and juiciness related quality characteristics of goat and sheep meat. Meat Sci. 34, 381-394 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(93)90085-V
  17. Tshabalala, P.A., Strydom, P.E., Webb, E.C., De Kock, H.L.: Meat quality of designated South African indigenous goat and sheep breeds. Meat Sci. 65, 563-570 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00249-8
  18. Sheradin, R., Hoffman, L.C., Ferreira, A.V.: Meat quality of Boer goat kids and Mutton Merino lambs 2 sensory meat evaluation. Anim. Sci. 76, 73-79 (2003).
  19. Pike, M.I., Smith, G.C., Carpenter, Z.L., Shelton, M.: Effects of maturity and fatness on the palatability of goat meat. J. Anim. Sci. 37 (269) (abstract 158). (1973).
  20. Smith, G.C., Carpenter, Z.L., Shelton, M.: Effects of age and quality level on the palatability of goat meat. J. Anim. Sci. 46, 1229-1235 (1978).
  21. Kauffman, R. G; carpenter, L; Bray, R. W, Hoeksta, W. G.: Biochemical properties of pork and their relationship to quality. II. Intramuscular fat. I. Food Sci. 29, 70-74 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1964.tb01696.x
  22. Libby, A. J.: Meat Hygiene, 4th editions. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 243-247. (1975).
  23. Srinivasan, S., Y. L. Xiong, Blanchard, P., Moody, W.: Proximate, mineral and fatty acid composition of semimembranous and cardiac muscles from grass - and grain fed cattle. J. Agri. Food Chem., 63, 543-547 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00134-9
  24. Pearson, A. M., Gillett, T. A.: Processed Meats, 3 editions. An Aspen publisher's inc. Maryland, 24-43 (1999).
  25. Pieniak, Lendzion, K., Niedzioka, R., Szeliga, W.: Comparison of slaughter value and some quality traits of ram lambs and goat kids. Annals-of-Animal-Science. 3(1), 35-40 (2003).
  26. Warriss, P. D.: Meat Science. An introductory text. CABI publishers, Bristol, 20-37. (2000).
  27. Gracey, J., Collins, D., Huey, R.: Meat Hygiene, 10th edition. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, New York. (1972).
  28. Ying, J.: Some goat breeds (China). World Animal Review. 58, 31-41 (1986).
  29. Zujovic, M., Josipovic, S., Petrovic, M., Gluhovic, M., Tomasevic, D.: Influence of body mass of kids prior to slaughtering on major meat quality traits. Biotechnology-in-Animal-Husbandry. 17(5/6), 169-174 (2001).
  30. McMillin, K.W., Brock, A.P.: Production practices and processing for value-added goat meat. J. Anim. Sci. 83, E57-E68 (2005).
  31. Amin, A., Borah P.: Bacteriological quality of goat meat marketed in Guwahati city. Indian Veterinary journal, 79(9), 944-947 (2002).
  32. ICMSF. Microorganism in foods, samples for Microbiological Analysis: principles and specific application. Recommendation of the International Commission on Microbiological Specification for Foods. Association of Microbiological Societies. Torento, University of Torento Press. (1985).p