DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Indicator and Threshold Value of National Highway Jointed Concrete Pavements

일반국도 줄눈 콘크리트 포장의 성능인자와 임계한도

  • 여현동 (인하대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 서영국 (한국도로공사 도로교통연구원) ;
  • 서영찬 (한양대학교 교통공학과) ;
  • 정진훈 (인하대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2009.12.17
  • Accepted : 2010.03.24
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

Recently, researches on the performance warranty contracting has been going on to improve construction quality in road pavement area. The performance warranty contracting gives construction companies opportunity to select materials and methods freely while asks them to maintain a certain level of performance during a given period. To introduce the performance warranty contracting in Korea, lots of research results on performance indicator and threshold value of asphalt pavement have been made to be included in the warranty specification. However, research effort on the performance indicator and threshold value of concrete pavement which is commonly constructed in expressway and national highway has not been enough. In this study, the warranty duration, performance indicator, and threshold value of the concrete pavement were investigated by reviewing literatures on cases of the performance warranty contracting in European countries and states of the US. Major distresses influencing the performance of jointed concrete pavement were investigated and analyzed to be compared to the warranty duration, performance indicator, and threshold value of foreign countries.

최근 도로포장 분야에서는 시공품질을 개선하기 위한 방편으로 성능보증 계약제도에 관한 연구가 진행되고 있다. 성능보증 계약제도는 시공회사에게 자유롭게 재료와 공법을 선택할 수 있는 기회를 부여하고 발주자가 제시하는 일정 수준 이상의 성능을 주어진 기간 동안 유지하게 하는 것이다. 성능보증 계약제도의 도입을 위하여 아스팔트 포장 분야에서는 성능보증 시방서에 포함될 성능인자와 임계한도에 관한 연구가 많이 진행된 상태이다. 그러나 고속국도뿐만 아니라 일반국도에서도 많이 시공되고 있는 콘크리트 포장 분야에서는 성능인자와 임계한도에 관한 연구가 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 유럽 국가와 미국 각 주의 성능보증 계약제도 사례에 관한 문헌을 검토하여 콘크리트 포장의 성능보증기간, 성능인자, 그리고 임계한도에 관한 조사를 실시하였다. 수원, 의정부, 예산, 충주, 전주, 포항, 남원, 진영, 정선, 영주, 진주, 홍천, 보은의 일반국도 13구간에서 줄눈 콘크리트 포장의 성능에 영향을 미치는 주요 파손을 조사하고 분석하여 해외의 성능보증기간, 성능인자, 그리고 임계한도와 비교하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 박성태, 박성욱, 장석명, 조성찬, 남효열, 박경원, 염상국, 인식연 (2007) 고속도로 포장상태 조사 및 분석(HPMS 부문), 최종보고서, 한국도로공사, pp. 17-30.
  2. 한국건설기술연구원(1997) 96국토유지보수조사, 연구보고서, 건설교통부, pp.1-92
  3. 한국건설기술연구원(2008) 2007 도로포장관리시스템, 최종보고서, 국토해양부, pp. 112-119.
  4. Anderson, S. D. and Russel, J. S. (2001) Guide Lines for Warranty Multi-parameter and Best-value Contracting, NCHRP Report 451, Transportation Research Board National Research Council, Washington, D.C.
  5. Anderson, S. D., Blaschke, B., Trejo, D., and Erbatur, O. C. (2003) Draft Warranty Specifications, FHWA/TX-05/0-4498-1, Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, Texas.
  6. Anderson, S. D., Blaschke, B., Trejo, D. and Erbatur, O. C (2005) Draft Warranty Implementation Plan, FHWA/TX-05/0-4498-P4, Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, Texas.
  7. Brautigam, D. F. (2007) Proposed Specification: 3550400-Pavement Evaluation and Remedial Action, Florida DOT, Tallahassee, Florida.
  8. Button, J. W. (2005) Pavement Aspects in Design-build Contracting for Highway Projects, Synthesis of Highway Practices Draft, Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Austin, Texas.
  9. D'Angelo, J., Huber, G. A., Symons, M. G., Whited, G. C., Sumtzer, R. K., Ramirez, T. L., Molenaar, K. R, Jones, D. R., Wood, J. W., Bower, S. C., Steele, J. J., Rice, J. F., Russell, J. S., and King, R. E. (2003) Asphalt Pavement Warranties : Technology and Practice in Europe, FHWA-PL-04-002, U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Alexandria, Virginia.
  10. Ferragut, T. (2003) Pavement Warranty Symposium Final Report, Michigan Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration, Grand Rapids, Minnesota
  11. Gharaibeh, N. G. and Miron, A. D. (2008) Warranty specifications for Highway Construction, Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board no 2081, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 77-82.
  12. Hancher, D. E. (1994) Use of Warranties in Road Construction, National Cooperative Highway Research Program NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice No. 195, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C, pp. 6-11.
  13. Hassan, R. A. and McManus, K. J. (2001) TrucK Ride Number : A New Management Tool, 20th ARRB Conference, 19-21 March 2001, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  14. Hastak, M. (2003) The Evaluation of Warranty Provisions on ODOT Construction Projects, FHWA/OH-2003/019, Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, Ohio.
  15. Hong, F. (2007) Modeling Heterogeneity in Transportation Infrastructure Deterioration :Application to Pavement, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
  16. Miller, J. S and Bellinger, W. Y. (2003) Distress Identification Manual for the Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, FHWARD-03-031, US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia.
  17. Minnesota DOT (2001) Design-Build Warranty Requirements, TH14/218 Design-Build Project, SP 7408-29, Owatonna, Minnesota Department of Transportation, March 20, 2001.
  18. Ozbek, M. E. (2004) Development of Performance Warranties for Performance Based Road Maintenance Contracts, Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia
  19. Sayers, M. W. and Karamihas, S. M. (1996) Estimation of Rideability by Analyzing Longitudinal Road Profile, Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board no 1536, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C, pp. 110-116.
  20. Singh, P., Singh, P., Labi, S., McCullouch, B. G., and Sinha, K. C. (2005) An Evaluation of the Cost-Effectiveness of Warranty Contracts in Indiana, FHWA/IN/JTRP-2004/34, Joint Transportation Research Program, West Lafayette, Indiana.
  21. Yu, J., Chou, Y. J., and Yau, J. T. (2006) Development of speedrelated rid quality thresholds using international roughness index, Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board no 1974, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 47-53.