화훼연구 (FLOWER RESEARCH JOURNAL)

  • 제17권2호
  • /
  • Pages.101-105
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-5009(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-772X(eISSN)
한국화훼학회 (The Korean Society for Floricultural Science)
권호 표지

화학적심제 dikegulac의 처리시기와 농도가 Rhododendron simsii 'California Sunset' 삽목묘의 분지 및 생육에 미치는 영향

Effect of Treatment Time and Concentration of Dikegulac on Lateral Branching and Growth of Rooted Cuttings in Rhododendron simsii 'California Sunset'

  • 정보영 (서울시립대학교 환경원예학과) ;
  • 이성춘 (서울시립대학교 환경원예학과) ;
  • 이승연 (서울시립대학교 환경원예학과) ;
  • 구진희 (서울시립대학교 환경원예학과) ;
  • 이정식 (서울시립대학교 환경원예학과)
  • 투고 : 2009.01.29
  • 심사 : 2009.04.06
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30

⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 화학적심제 dikegulac의 처리시기와 농도가 Rhododendron simsii 'California Sunset'의 분지 및 생육에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 수행하였다. 6월에 dikegulac의 처리는 8월에 처리한것 보다 식물의 정아 발달을 지연시켰으나, 잎의 크기와 엽록소의 함량 및 분지수를 증가 시켰다. 특히, $1,500mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$의 처리가 가장 우수하였다.

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of treatment time and concentration of a chemical pinching agent, dikegulac, on branches and growth of Rhododendron simsii 'California Sunset'. R. simsii 'California Sunset' developed lateral branches naturally but the number of them was few. Treatment of dikegulac delayed the terminal bud development, increased in size, the chlorophyll contents of the leaf, and the number of lateral branches in June. Especially, the number of lateral branches were better at $1,500mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ dikegulac than the others. But growth in August of R. simsii 'California Sunset' was naturally lower than June, there was no effect of lateral branches by dikegulac.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arzee, T., H. Langenauer, and J. Gressel. 1977. Effects of dikegulac, a new growth regulator, on apical growth and development of three compositae. Bot. Gaz. 138:18-28. https://doi.org/10.1086/336891
  2. Carter, J., B.P. Singh, and W. Whitehead. 1996. Dikegulac, but not benzyladenine, enhances the aesthetic quality of Boston Fern. HortScience 31:978-980.
  3. Choudhury, S. and K. Gupta. 1998. Effect of dikegulac on growth and alkaloid production in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. DON. (Pink flowered). J. Plant Biol. 41:149-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030247
  4. Larson, R.A. and R.L. Biamonte. 1972. Response of azaleas to precisely controlled temperatures. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:491-493.
  5. Lee, J.S. 1983. Growth regulators for the quality improvement in pot plants and cut flower. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 24:382-404.
  6. Lee, J.S. 1995. Rhododendrons. pp. 21-126. Seoil Publ. House. Seoul. , Korea.
  7. Lee, J.S., J.Y. Kim, and S.J. Yoon. 2007. Effect of temperature on growth of native and introduced Sedum Species during cuttings propagation. J. Kor. Flower Res. Soc. 15:164-168.
  8. McGraw, J.B. 1989. Effects of age and size on life histories and population growth of Rhododendron maximum shoots. Amer. J. Bot. 76:113-123. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444780
  9. Norcini, J.G. and J.H. Aldrich. 1994. Flowering response of Bougainvillea cultivars to dikegulac. HortScience 29:282-284.
  10. Orson, P. and A.M. Kofranek. 1978. Dikegulac-sodium as a pinching agent for evergreen azalea. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103:801-804.
  11. Parups, E.V. and W.E. Cordukes. 1977. Growth of turfgrasses as affected by Atrinal and Embark. HortScience 13:258-259.
  12. RDA (Rural Development Administration). 2003. Standard of investigation for agriculture research. RDA, Suwon, Korea.
  13. Roh, S.M. 1978. Lateral shoot induction and flowering responses of stock, Mathiola incana and Petunia, Petunia hybrida by growth regulator and light treatment. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 19:154-166.
  14. Sachs, R.M., H. Hield, and J. DeBie. 1975. Dikegulac: A promising new foliar-applied growth regulator for woody species. HortScience 10:367-369.
  15. Wright, D.C. and J.T. Moran. 1988. Effect of Atrinal (Dikegulac) on the growth of plane tree, red maple and norway maple in New York. J. of Arboriculture 14:121-124.
  16. Zilkah, S. and J. Gressel. 1980. Multistage disruption of protoplasts by Dikegulac. Planta 147:274-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379832