DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EndoVac®과 EndoActivator®를 이용한 근관세척법의 Enterococcus faecalis 제거 효율 평가

EVALUATION OF ENTEROCOCCUS FAECALIS REMOVAL EFFICACY OF THE ENDOVAC® AND ENDOACTIVATOR® INTRACANAL IRRIGATION METHODS

  • 송승곤 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박세희 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조경모 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김진우 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Song, Seung-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30

초록

이 실험의 목적은 $EndoVac^{(R)}$$EndoActivator^{(R)}$를 이용한 근관세척시 근관 내 접종된 Enterococcus faecalis의 제거 효율을 기존의 irrigation needle을 이용한 방법과 비교 평가하고자 함이다. 발거된 70개의 단근치를 사용하였으며 .04 taper ProFile #40까지 근관형성 후 치아를 멸균하고 근관에 E. faecalis를 접종하고 배양하였다. 치아는 근관세척 방법에 따라 20개씩 3개의 실험군과 2개의 대조군으로 나누었다. 2.5% 치아염소산나트륨을 사용하여 근관세척 시행 후 일차 표본을 채취하였고, 다시 근관 내에 배양액을 채우고 24시간 동안 배양 후 이차 표본을 채취하였다. 표본은 colony forming units (CFU) 값을 얻기 위해 BHI agar plate에 배양하였다. 일차 표본 결과에서는 모든 실험치아 중 기존의 근관세척 방법을 이용한 하나의 근관에서 양성 배양을 보였다. 이차 표본 결과에서는 $EndoVac^{(R)}$ 실험군에서 가장 적은 양성 배양을 보였으며, 기존의 근관세척 방법과 비교시 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 실험 결과에 따르면 $EndoVac^{(R)}$은 근관 내 접종된 E. faecalis의 제거에 있어 기존의 근관세척 방법보다 더 좋은 효율을 보였다.

The aim of this study was to evaluate endodontic irrigation methods with $EndoVac^{(R)}$ and $EndoActivator^{(R)}$ in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canals. Extracted 70 human single-rooted teeth were used. The canals were instrumented by a crown-down technique with .04 taper ProFile to ISO size 40. After the teeth were autoclaved, the canals were inoculated with E. faecalis and incubated for 48 h. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 teeth each according to canal irrigation methods and two control groups as follows: group 1 - $EndoVac^{(R)}$; group 2 - $EndoActivator^{(R)}$; group 3-Conventional needle irrigation method. After canal irrigation using 2.5% NaOCl. first samples (S1) were taken using sterile paper point. And the canals were filled with sterile brain heart infusion (BHI) broth and incubated for 24 h, then second samples (S2) were taken. The samples were cultured on BHI agar plate to determine the numbers of colony forming units (CFU). In first sampling (S1), only one canal of conventional method among the all experimental groups was positive cultured. In second sampling (S2), $EndoVac^{(R)}$ group showed the least positive culture numbers of E. faecalis. There was statistically significant difference between the $EndoVac^{(R)}$ and conventional needle irrigation methods in the mean value of Log CFU. According to the results of this study, $EndoVac^{(R)}$ showed better efficacy than conventional needle irrigation method in the elimination of E. faecalis from the root canal.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposure of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 20:340-348, 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(65)90166-0
  2. Sjogren U, Figdor D, Spangberg L, Sundqvist G. The antimicrobial effect of calcium hydroxide as a shortterm intracanal dressing. Int Endod J 24:119-125, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb00117.x
  3. Bystrom A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 89:321-328, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1981.tb01689.x
  4. Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Wesselink PR. The capability of two hand instrumentation techniques to remove the inner layer of dentine in oval canals. Int Endod J 36:218?224, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00646.x
  5. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. J Endod 9:475-479, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80162-9
  6. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vivo evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. J Endod 3:394-398, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(77)80172-6
  7. Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 79:492- 496, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80134-9
  8. Heard F, Walton RE. Scanning electron microscope study comparing four root canal preparation techniques in small curved canals. Int Endod J 30:323-331, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00718.x
  9. Gutarts R, Nusstein J, Reader A, Beck M. In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars. J Endod 31:166-170, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000137651.01496.48
  10. McGill S, Gulabivala K, Mordan N, Ng YL. The efficacy of dynamic irrigation using a commercially available system (RinsEndo ${\circledR}$ ) determined by removal of a collagen ‘bio-molecular film’from an ex vivo model. Int Endod J 41:602-608, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01408.x
  11. Hauser V, Braun A, Frentzen M. Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo ${\circledR}$ ). Int Endod J 40:644-652, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01264.x
  12. Siqueira JF Jr, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 30:279-282, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb00708.x
  13. Clegg MS, Vertucci FJ, Walker C, Belanger M, Britto LR. The effect of exposure to irrigant solutions on apical dentin biofilms in vitro. J Endod 32:434-437, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.07.002
  14. Dunavant TR, Regan JD, Glickman GN, Solomon ES, Honeyman AL. Comparative evaluation of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms. J Endod 32:527-531, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.001
  15. Pashley EL, Birdsong NL, Bowman K, Pashley DH. Cytotoxic effects of NaOCl on vital tissue. J Endod 11:525-528, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80197-7
  16. Gatot A, Arbelle J, Leiberman A, Yanai-Inbar I. Effects of sodium hypochlorite on soft tissues after its inadvertent injection beyond the root apex. J Endod 17:573-574, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81725-5
  17. Gernhardt CR, Eppendorf K, Kozlowski A, Brandt M. Toxicity of concentrated sodium hypochlorite used as an endodontic irrigant. Int Endod J 37:272-280, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00804.x
  18. Schoeffel GJ. The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation, Part 2- Efficacy. Dent Today 26:82-87, 2008
  19. Fukumoto Y, Kikuchi I, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. An ex vivo evaluation of a new root canal irrigation technique with intracanal aspiration. Int Endod J 39:93-99, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01050.x
  20. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1:170- 175, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985.tb00652.x
  21. Fidgor D, Davies JK, Sundqvist G. Starvation survival, growth and recovery of Enterococcus faecalis in human serum. Oral Microbiol Immunol 18:234-239, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-302X.2003.00072.x
  22. Jee SW, Kim ES, Jung IY, Yoo YJ. The effect of canal filling with gutta-percha or Resilon on Enterococcus faecalis in bovine dentinal tubules. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 30:385-392, 2005 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.385
  23. Kim HJ, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. Evaluation of time-dependent antimicrobial effect of sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) on Enterococcus faecalis in the root canal. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 32:121-128, 2007 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.2.121
  24. Albrecht LJ, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Evaluation of apical debris removal using various sizes and tapers of ProFile GT files. J Endod 30:425-428, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00012
  25. Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV. The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 54:323-328, 1982
  26. Siqueira JF Jr, Arau、jo MCP, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJS. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 23:499-502, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80309-3
  27. Usman AN, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG. Influence of instrument size on root canal debridement. J Endod 30:110-112, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200402000-00012
  28. Schoeffel J, Sbeih W, Wallace J. Efficacy of a new endodontic irrigation method using negative pressure. Abstract 1593. Presented at IADR 83rd General Session; Baltimore, MD, March 9-12, 2005
  29. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canal irrigation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 44:306-312, 1977 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(77)90285-7
  30. Hwang HK, Bae SC, Cho YL. The irrigating effect before and after coronal flaring. Journal of Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry 28:72-79, 2003 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.072
  31. Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 33:611-615. 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.01.020
  32. Ruddle CJ. Hydrodynamic disinfection: Tsunami Endodontics. Dent Today 26:110, 112, 114-117, 2007
  33. Pitt WG. Removal of oral biofilm by sonic phenomena. Am J Dent 18:345-352, 2005
  34. van der Sluis LWM, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies. Int Endod J 40:52-57, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01182.x
  35. Kuruvilla JR, Kamath MP. Antimicrobial activity of 2.5% NaOCl and 0.2% CHX gluconate separately and combined, as endodontic irrigants. J Endod 24:472- 476, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80049-6