DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Robust Airspeed Estimation of an Unpowered Gliding Vehicle by Using Multiple Model Kalman Filters

다중모델 칼만 필터를 이용한 무추력 비행체의 대기속도 추정

  • 진재현 (순천대학교 기계우주항공공학부) ;
  • 박정우 (KAIST 항공우주공학과 대학원) ;
  • 김부민 (경상대학교 기계항공공학부 대학원) ;
  • 김병수 (경상대학교 기계항공공학부, 항공기부품기술연구소) ;
  • 이은용 (국방과학연구소)
  • Published : 2009.08.01

Abstract

The article discusses an issue of estimating the airspeed of an autonomous flying vehicle. Airspeed is the difference between ground speed and wind speed. It is desirable to know any two among the three speeds for navigation, guidance and control of an autonomous vehicle. For example, ground speed and position are used to guide a vehicle to a target point and wind speed and airspeed are used to maximize flight performance such as a gliding range. However, the target vehicle has not an airspeed sensor but a ground speed sensor (GPS/INS). So airspeed or wind speed has to be estimated. Here, airspeed is to be estimated. A vehicle's dynamics and its dynamic parameters are used to estimate airspeed with attitude and angular speed measurements. Kalman filter is used for the estimation. There are also two major sources arousing a robust estimation problem; wind speed and altitude. Wind speed and direction depend on weather conditions. Altitude changes as a vehicle glides down to the ground. For one reference altitude, multiple model Kalman filters are pre-designed based on several reference airspeeds. We call this group of filters as a cluster. Filters of a cluster are activated simultaneously and probabilities are calculated for each filter. The probability indicates how much a filter matches with measurements. The final airspeed estimate is calculated by summing all estimates multiplied by probabilities. As a vehicle glides down to the ground, other clusters that have been designed based on other reference altitudes are activated. Some numerical simulations verify that the proposed method is effective to estimate airspeed.

Keywords

References

  1. W. Phillips, Mechanics of Flight, Wiley, 2004.
  2. R. Rysdyk, "Unmanned aerial vehicle path following for target observation in wind," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1092-1100,2006 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.19101
  3. K. Lievens, J. Mulder, and P. Chu, "Single GPS antenna attitude detennination of a fixed wing aircraft with aircraft aerodynamics," AIAA 2005-6056
  4. A. Cho, Et. AI., "Fully automatic taxiing, takeoff and landing of a UAY using a single antenna GPS receiver only," Proceedings of International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 821-825, Seoul, Korea, 2007
  5. F. Lewis, L. Xie, and D. Popa, Optimal and Robust Estimation, CRC Press, 2008
  6. I. Petersen and A. Savkin, Robust Kalman Filteringfor Signals and Systems with Large Uncertainties, Birkhauser, pp. 11-34, 1999
  7. R. Agustin, R. Mangoubi, R. Hain, and N. Adams, "Robust fuilure detection for reentIy vehicle attitude control systems," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 839-845,1999 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4461
  8. Z. Wang and B. Huang, "Robust H2/H$\infty$ filtering for linear systems with error variance constraints," IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2463-2467, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/78.852028
  9. H. Gao, J. Lam, L. Xie, and C. Wang, "New approach to mixed H2/H$\infty$ filtering for polytopic discrete-time systems," IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 3183-3192, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2005.851116
  10. P. Maybeck and R. Stevens, "Reconfigurable flight control via multiple model adaptive control methods," IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 470-480, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.81428
  11. M. Napolitano and R Swaim, "New technique for aircraft flight control reconfiguration," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 14, no. l,pp. 184-190, 1991 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20620
  12. P. Maybeck and P. Hanlon, "Perfonnance enhancement of a multiple model adaptive estimator," IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1240-1254, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.464348
  13. G Griffin and P. Maybeck, "MMAE/MMAC control for bending with multiple uncertain parameters," IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 903-912,1997. https://doi.org/10.1109/7.599265
  14. E. Mazor, A. Averbuch, Y. Bar-Shalom, and J. Dayan, "Interacting multiple model methods in target tracking : A survey," IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 103-123, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.640267
  15. Y. Kim and K. Hong, "An IMM algorithm for tracking maneuvering vehicles in an adaptive cruise control environment," International Journal of Control, and Systems, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 310-318, 2004
  16. 김병두, 이자성, "다중표적 추적을 위한 정상상태 칼만필터 기반 IMM 추적필터," 한국항공우주학회지, 제34권 제8호, pp.71-78, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2006.34.8.071
  17. 김부민, 진재현, 박정호, 김병수, "바람센서가 없는 무추력 비행체의 활공시 대기속도 추정을 통한 유도성능 향상," 제어.로봇.시스템학회논문지, 제15권 제1호, pp.1-7, 2009
  18. 김부민, 성덕용, 성재민, 김병수, "무추력 비행체를 대항으로 한 정응 통합 유도제어기 설계," 제어.로봇.시스템학회논문지, 제15권 제1호 pp.15-22, 2009
  19. R. Nelson, Flight Stability and Automatic Control, MeGraw Hill, pp. 131-169, 1998

Cited by

  1. Airspeed Estimation of Course Correction Munitions by Using Extended Kalman Filter vol.43, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2015.43.5.405