임플란트 환자의 일반적 특성 및 구강관심도에 따른 기능별 만족도 연구

Study for general characters of dental implant patients and satisfaction level of function by dental interest level

  • 유은미 (극동정보대학 치위생과) ;
  • 황윤숙 (한양여자대학 치위생과)
  • 투고 : 2009.07.21
  • 심사 : 2009.09.20
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30

초록

For this study, self-completion survey for 149 implant patients of dental clinics and hospitals in Seoul and Kyunggi areahas been executed in order to provide basic data for increasing patient satisfaction level by effective consultation and various information for the patients who want dental implantation. The conclusion of the study is like below. 1. In terms of demographics of the study, sample size of female patients(n=85) was more than that of male patients(n=64) and patients in their 50s were major age group. When it comes to the educational level, university graduates were 85 and high school graduates were 44. And 132 were married and 6 were single. In the income level, monthly income between KRW 2~4 million was major group(n=59). 2. In the study, patients' most concern was complication or adverse events(n=41), and price(n=39) & annual dental check-up(n=49) were following it. And 80 patients responded that dental health is the most valuable(n=80) and whole body health was following(n=37). In terms of knowledge on dental implant, 100 patients responded 'know just a little', 31 and 13 answered 'generally know' and 'well know' each. 3. As a result of analyzing implant patients' satisfaction level by segment, general satisfaction rate was highest as 4.20, social satisfaction rate was 4.20, psychological function was 4.06 and masticatory function was 3.90. 4. Based on the result of comparing patient satisfaction level by general characters of dental implant patient, chewing function was the highest in the age group of 60s with score of 4.21 and in terms of social function, the group with over KRW 8 million of monthly income showed highest score with 4.54. When it comes to the psychological function, patients in their 70s showed highest satisfaction level with 4.52. In the end, patients in their 70s showed highest score with 4.81 in the overall satisfaction and it was also statistically significant. 5. In the overall satisfaction level by interest in dental health, appearance showed highest score with 4.57 and it was also significantly higher than that of whole body. In the variance by dental knowledge, 'well know' group showed highest score with 4.58, and that of 'just a little' group was 4.33. That means there are correlations between dental knowledge and satisfaction level. 6. As a result of analyzing correlations amongst variances of the study, there were strong positive correlations among them. And there were very significantly positive correlations especially between social and psychological function and between psychological and overall satisfaction level. In conclusion, higher psychological function has strong relations with both social function and overall satisfaction level(p<.001).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 정의윤. 임플란트 보철 진료환자의 인식. 조선대학교 환경보건대학원 석사학위논문 2003.
  2. 황윤숙, 김선주, 김연화 외. 치과 임플란트학. 대한나래출판사, p3-8, 2002.
  3. 김선재. 임플란트 환자상담을 위해 반드시 알아야 할 임플란트 지식, 대한구강악악면임프란트학회지 2006.
  4. 장봉준. 연령별 성별에 따른 임플란트 선택 동기. 중앙대학교 대학원 치의학과 석사학위논문 2002.
  5. 홍성재. 임플란트 환자의 유형및 분포에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 치의학과 석사학위논문 2002.
  6. 이혜정. 임플란트 시술환자의 치과 의료서비스 만족도에 관한 연구. 대구가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학원 석사학위논문 2005.
  7. 정형근. 두 종류의 치과 임플란트 식립 후 조직반응에 대한 비교 연구. 경희대학교 대학원 치주학과 석사학위논문 2002.
  8. 조인호. 임플란트의 고정체와 지대주의 연결형태가 임플란트의 피로 강도에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 단국대학교 대학원 보철과 박사학위논문 2001.
  9. 박지은, 윤정호, 정의원 외. 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 34(4):819, 2004.
  10. 장봉준. 연령별 성별에 따른 임플란트 선택 동기. 중앙대학교 대학원 치의학과 석사학위논문 2002.
  11. Levi A, Psoter W, Agar JR, Reisine ST, Taylor TD. Patient self-reported satisfaction with maxillary anterior dental implant treatment. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 18(1):113-120, 2003.
  12. 류연정. 치과 임플랜트에 관한 인식도 조사연구. 단국대학교 정책경영대학원 석사학위논문 2004.
  13. 신철호. 임플란트 시술환자의 치아상실 부위별 만족도 연구. 연세대학교 보건대학원 석사학위논문 2004.
  14. Thomason JM, Lund JP, Chehade A, Feine JS: Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 16:67-73, 2003.
  15. Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang B. R. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy, J. Prosthet Dent 78(6);574-581, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70008-8