Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The effect of working parameters on removal of casting gold alloy using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler with scaler tip in vitro

압전방식 초음파 치석제거기의 작업조건에 따른 치과주조용 합금의 삭제에 관한 연구

  • 차국봉 (울산대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김원경 (서울아산병원 치주과) ;
  • 이영규 (서울아산병원 치주과) ;
  • 김영성 (서울아산병원 치주과)
  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic scalers have been widely used for removing biofilm which is considered as major etiologic factor of periodontal disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of working parameters of piezoeletric ultrasonic scaler with scaler tip (No. 1 tip) on casting gold alloy removal. Methods: Type III dental casting gold alloy (Firmilay$^{circledR}$, Jelenko Inc, CA, USA) was used as substitute for tooth substance. Piezoeletric ultrasonic scaler and No.1 scaler tip (P-Max$^{circledR}$, Satelec, France) were selected. The selected working parameters were mode (P mode, S mode), power setting (2, 4, 8) and lateral force (0.5 N, 1.0 N, 2.0 N). The effect of working parameters was evaluated in terms of ablation depth, ablation width and ablation area. Results: Mode influenced ablation depth and ablation area. Power also influenced ablation depth and ablation area. Especially, Power 2 and power 8 showed statistically significant difference. Lateral force had influence on ablation width, and 0.5 N resulted significant increase compared with 1.0 N and 2.0 N. Ablation depth was influenced by mode, power and lateral force and defect width was influenced by lateral force. Ablation area was influenced by mode and power. Conclusions: It can be concluded that the use of piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler with No. 1 scaler tip in S mode and high power may result in significant loss of tooth substance.

Keywords

References

  1. Loe H, Theilade E and Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol 1965;36:177-187 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.3.177
  2. Costerton JW, Stewart PS and Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: acommon cause of persistent infections. Science 1999;284:1318-1322 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318
  3. Darveau RP, Tanner A and Page RC. The microbial challenge in periodontitis. Periodontol 2000 1997;14:12-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00190.x
  4. Socransky SS and Haffajee AD. Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets. Periodontol 2000 2002;28:12-55 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280102.x
  5. Stende GW and Schaffer EM. A comparison of ultrasonic and hand scaling. J Periodontol 1961;32:312 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1961.32.4.312
  6. Gellin RG, Miller MC, Javed T, Engler WO and Mishkin DJ. The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus: a human surgical evaluation. J Periodontol 1986;57:672-680 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1986.57.11.672
  7. Breininger DR, O’Leary TJ and Blumenshine RV. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. J Periodontol 1987;58:9-18 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.1.9
  8. Caffesse RG, Alspach SR, Morrison EC and Burgett FG. Scaling and root planning with and without periodontal flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:205-210 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb01461.x
  9. Buchanan SA and Robertson PA. Calculus removal by scaling/root planningwith and without surgical access. J Periodontol 1987;58:159-163 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.3.159
  10. Matia JI, Bissada NF, Maybury JE and Riccetti P. Efficiency of scalng of the molar furcation area with and without surgical access. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1986;6:25-35
  11. Fleischer HC, Mellonig JT, Brayer WK, Gray JL and Barnett JD. Scaling and root planning efficacy in multirooted teeth. J Periodontol 1989;60:402-409 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1989.60.7.402
  12. Parashis AO, Anagnou-Vareltzides A and Demetriou N. Calculus removal from multirooted teeth with and without surgical access. I. Efficacy on external and furcation surfaces in relation to probing depth. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:63-68 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb01762.x
  13. Zappa U, Smith B, Simona C, Graf H, Case D and Kim W. Root substance removal by scaling and root planning. J Periodontol 1991;62:750-754 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.750
  14. Fogel HM and Pashley DH. Effect of periodontal root planning on dentin permeability. J Clin Periodontol 1993;20:673-677 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1993.tb00714.x
  15. Fukazawa E and Nishimura K. Superficial cemental curettage: its efficacy in promoting improved cellular attachment on human root surfaces previously damaged by periodontitis. J Periodontol 1994;65:168-176 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1994.65.2.168
  16. Kerry GJ. Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes. J Periodontol 1967;38:340-346 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.340
  17. Wilkinson RF and Maybury JE. Scanning electron microscopy of the root surface following instrumentation. J Periodontol 1973;44:559-563 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1973.44.9.559
  18. Aleo JJ, De Renzis FA and Farber PA. In vitro attachment of human gingival fibroblasts to root surface. J Periodontol 1975;46:639-645 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1975.46.11.639
  19. Nakib NM, Bissada NF, Simmelink JW and Goldstine SN. Endotoxin penetration into root cementum of periodontally healthy and diseased human teeth. J Periodontol 1982;53:368-378 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1982.53.6.368
  20. Checchi L and Pelliccioni GA. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation in the removal of endotoxins from root surfaces in vitro. J Periodontol 1988;59:398-402 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.6.398
  21. Cheetham WA, Wilson M and Kieser JB. Root surface debridement- an in vitro assessment. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:288-292 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01586.x
  22. Smart GJ, Wilson M and Davies EH. The assessment of ultrasonic root surface debridement by determination of residual endotoxin levels. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:174-178 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1990.tb01082.x
  23. Claffey N, Polyzois I and Ziaka P. An overview of nonsurgical and surgical therapy. Periodontol 2000 2004;36:35-44 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2004.00073.x
  24. Trenter SC and Walmsley AD. Ultrasonic dental scaler: associated hazards. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:95-101 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00276.x
  25. Arabaci T, Cicek Y and Canakci CF. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Int J Dent Hyg 2007;5:2-12 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2007.00217.x
  26. Drisko CH. Root instrumentation: power-driven versus manual scalers, which one Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:229-244
  27. Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R and Klaiber B. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:158-163 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02422.x
  28. Young-kyoo Lee. Root surface roughness following mechanical instrumentation in vivo and in vitro SEM study. J Korean Acad Periodontol 1998;28:823-828 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.1998.28.4.823
  29. Young-kyoo Lee. The Effect of a Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler with Curette Tip on Root Substitute Removal in Vitro. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2000;30:429- 441 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2000.30.2.429
  30. Young-kyoo Lee. The Effect of a Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler with Curette Tip on Casting Gold Removal in Vitro. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2001;31:531-542 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2001.31.3.531
  31. http://www.jelenko.com/ENGLISH/alloy_spec/FIRMILAYBOOK.pdf
  32. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials, 9th ed. St. Louis:Mosby-Year Book, Inc.; 1993:89
  33. Hildebrand CN and Morse DR. Periodontic-endodontic interrelationships. Dent Clin North Am 1980;24:797-812
  34. Nyman S, Westfelt E, Sarhed G and Karring T. The role of diseased root cementum in healing following treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:464-468 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1988.tb01601.x