여성 지체장애인의 건강 관련 경험에 관한 페미니스트 질적 연구

Health-Related Experience of Women with Physical Disabilities using Feminist Qualitative Approach

  • 투고 : 2009.04.27
  • 심사 : 2009.08.17
  • 발행 : 2009.08.31

초록

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to understand and describe health-related experience of women with physical disabilities, using feminist qualitative approach. Methods: Eight women with physical disabilities participated to the study. Their mean age was 43, ranging from 39 to 67 years old. The data were collected by individual in-depth interviews and all interviews were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. The transcribed data were analyzed using traditional qualitative content analysis from a feminist perspective. Results: Six major categories emerged from the data. Category 1: "Isolation and alienation from the world.", Category 2: "A distorted self-image of physically disabled body.", Category 3: "Difficulties due to a fixed gender role.", Category 4: "Constant suffering from chronic pain.", Category 5: "Health problems that they have to endure by themselves.", Category 6: "Sublimation through self-reliance." The results of the study show how Korean women with physical disabilities suffer from social stigma, indifferences, and discriminations and struggle to survive in these unfriendly surroundings. Conclusion: The results of the study would help health professionals in designing effective intervention to improve health and to empower women with physical disabilities by providing deep understanding and critical insights of those women.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Campbell, J., & Bunting, S. (1991). Voices and paradigms: Perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 13(3), 1-15.
  2. Chae, O. H. (2001). The disabled homemakers' copping strategies on housework. Journal of Korean Home Management, 19(1), 131-142.
  3. Coyle, C. P., Santiago, M. C., & Shank, J. W. (2000). Secondary conditions and women with physical disabilities: A descriptive study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(10), 1380-1387. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.9169
  4. Deegan, M. J., & Brooks, N. A. (1985). Women and disability: The double handicap. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  5. Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13 (3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
  6. Gill, C. J. (1997). Women's health: Complexities and differences. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
  7. Han, H. S., & Lim, N. Y. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure the motivation for rehabilitation in the disabled. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing, 14(4), 554-563.
  8. Kim, J. E. (1999). A study on double discrimination of women with disabilities. Unpublished master's thesis, The Catholic University, Seoul.
  9. Kim, K. H. (1999). Bodies of disabled women and their identity formation. Journal of Korean Women's Studies, 15(2), 185-217.
  10. Kim, M. O., Kim, H. S., & Lee, M. Y. (2005). A study on empowerment Process of the disabled: Focused on experience of 'pre-adulthood'. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 57(1), 31-60.
  11. Kinne, S., & Patrick, D. L. (2004). Prevalence of secondary conditions among people with disabilities. American Journal of Public Health, 94(3), 443-445. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.3.443
  12. Kwak, J. Y. (2005). The study on the empowerment process in disabled women. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul.
  13. Lee, E. M. (2005). Sexuality of disabled women: A feminist approach. Asian Women, 44(1), 97-130.
  14. Lloyd, M. (1992). Does she boil eggs? Towards a feminist model of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(3), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780231
  15. Lonsdale, S. (1990). Women and disability. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  16. Meyers, A. R., Anderson, J. J., & Miller, D. R. (2002). Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: Substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Social Science & Medicine, 55(8), 1435-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00269-6
  17. Morris, J. (1992). Personal and political: A feminist perspective on researching physical disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 7(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649266780181
  18. Oh, H. K. (2006). A Study on discrimination faced by Korean women with disabilities. Social Welfare Review, 11, 24-78.
  19. Park, M. S. (2005). The phenomenal study of prejudice that the handicapped experience: Focusing on the midwayhandicapped person. Unpublished master's thesis, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju.
  20. Sandelowski, M. (1986). The problem of rigor in qualitative research. Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005
  21. Seekins, T., Clay, J., & Ravesloot, C. (1994). A descriptive study of secondary conditions reported by a population of adults with physical disabilities served by three independent living centers in a rural state. The Journal of Rehabilitation, 60, 47-51.
  22. The Ministry for Health and Welfare, Seoul, (2006, March). Registered disable persons by type of disability and province. Retrieved June 20, from web site: http://www.mohw.go.kr/
  23. Yi, M., & Yih, B. S. (2004). Feminism and qualitative nursing research. Journal of Korean Academy Nursing, 34(3), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.3.565
  24. Yu, M. H., & Um, M. S. (2007). A study on pregnancy, child birth, child care and social support about the women with disabilities. Rehabilitation Research, 11(2), 131-157.