DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Temperature and Moisture on the Survival of Colletotrichum acutatum, the Causal Agent of Pepper Anthracnose in Soil and Pepper Fruit Debris

  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

The survival of Colletotrichum acutatum was investigated in soil, infected fruits, and infected fruit debris incorporated into soil at several temperatures with different soil moisture levels. Samples were examined at 2-week intervals for 18 weeks to determine the survival of the pathogen based on the number of colony forming unit (CFU) of C. acutatum recovered on a semi-selective medium. C. acutatum conidia survived in both sterile and non-sterile soil at 4 and $10^{\circ}C$ for 18 weeks. If infected pepper fruits were completely dried, C. acutatum survived for 18 weeks at temperature from 4 to $20^{\circ}C$. Soil temperature and moisture affected the survival of C. acutatum in infected fruit debris incorporated into soil after air-drying. The effect of soil moisture on survival was weaker at low temperatures than at high temperatures. For up to 16 weeks, conidia were recovered from fruit debris in soil that had been kept at 4 to $20^{\circ}C$ and below 6% soil moisture. Conidia were recovered from fields until approximately 6 months after pepper fruits were harvested. Using PCR with species-specific primers and a pathogenicity test, we identified conidia recovered from soil and infected fruit from both the laboratory and field as C. acutatum and as the primary inoculum causing pepper anthracnose.

Keywords

References

  1. Bailey, K. L. and Euczek, L. J. 1996. Managing cereal diseases under reduced tillage. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 18:150-167 https://doi.org/10.1080/07060669609500641
  2. Bockus, W. W. and Shroyer, J. P. 1998. The impact of reduced till-age on soilborne plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36:485-500 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.485
  3. Buchwaldt, L., Morrall, R. A. A., Chongo, G. and Bernier, C. C. 1996. Windborne dispersal of Colleotrichum truncatum and survival in infected lentil debris. Phytopathology 86:1193-1198 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-86-1193
  4. Dillard, H. R. and Cobb, A. C. 1998. Survival of Colletortrichum coccdes in infected tomato tissue and in soil. Plant Dis. 82:235-238 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.2.235
  5. Eastburn, D. M. and Gubler, W. D. 1990. Strawberry anthracnose: Detection and survival of Colleotrichum acutatum in soil. Plant Dis. 74:161-163 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-74-0161
  6. Ekehan, E. J., Simons, S. A. and Nwankiti, A. O. 2000. Survival of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (causal agent of yam anthracnose) in soil. Trop. Sci. 40:163-168
  7. Elad, Y., Shabi, E. and Katan, T. 1988. Negatvie cross resistance between benzimidazole and N-phenylcarbamate fungicides and control of Botrytis cinerea on grapes. Plant Phathol. 37:141-147 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1988.tb02206.x
  8. Farley, J. D. 1972. A selective medium for assay of Colletotrichum coccodes in siol. Phytopathology 62:1288-1293 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-62-1288
  9. Feil, W S., Butler, E. E., Duniway, J. M. and Gubler, W D. 2003. The effects of moisture and temperature on the survival of Colletotrichum acutatum on strawberry residue in soil. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 25:362-370 https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660309507091
  10. Freeman, S., Shalev, Z. and Katan, J. 2002. Survival in soil of Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides pathogenic on strawberry. Plant Dis. 86:965-970 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.9.965
  11. Kang, B. K, Min, J. Y, Park, S. W, Van Bach, N.,and Kim, H. T. 2005. Semi-selective medium for monitoring Colletotrichum acutatum causing pepper anthracnose in the field. Res. Plant Dis. 11:21-27 https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2005.11.1.021
  12. Katan, J. 1981. Solar heating (solarization) of soil for control of soilborne pests. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 19:211-236 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.19.090181.001235
  13. Kato, T., Suzuki, I., Takahashi, J. and Kamoshita, K 1984. Negatively correlated cross-resistance between benzimidazole fungicides and methyl N-(3,4-dichloropheny) carbamate. J. Pesticide Sci. 9:489-495 https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.9.489
  14. Kim, J. T., Park, S.-K, Choi, W, Lee, Y-H. and Kim, H. T. 2008. Characterization of Colletotrichum isolates causing anthracnose of pepper in Korea. Plant Pathol. J. 24:17-23 https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2008.24.1.017
  15. Martin, N. M. 2003. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41:325-350 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095514
  16. Norman, D. J. and Strandberg, J. O. 1997. Survival of Colletotrichum acutatum in soil and plant debris of leather leaf fern. Plant Dis. 81:1177-1180 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.10.1177
  17. Park, K S. and Kim, C. H. 1992. Identification, distribution and etiological characteristics of anthracnose fungi of red pepperin Korea. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 8:61-69
  18. Ripoche, A., Jacqua, G, Bussiere, F., Guyader, S. and Sierra, J. 2008. Survival of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (causal agent of yam anthracnose) on yam residues decomposing in soil. Appl. Soil Ecol. 38:270-278 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.10.015
  19. Tu, J. C. 1983. Epidemiology of anthracnose caused by Colletotrichum lindemuthianum on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in southern Ontario: Survival of the pathogen. Plant Dis. 67:402-404 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-67-402
  20. Vizvary, M. A. and Warren, H. L. 1982. Survival of Colletotrichum graminicola in soil. Phytopathology 72:522-525 https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-72-522
  21. Wilson, L. L., Madden, L. V. and Ellis, M. A. 1992. Overwinter survival of Colletotrichum acutatum in infected strawberry fruits in Ohio. Plant Dis. 76:948-950 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-76-0948
  22. Yoshida, S. and Shirata, A. 1999. Survival of Colletotrichum dematium in soil and infected mulberry leaves. Plant Dis. 83:465-468 https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1999.83.5.465

Cited by

  1. Characterization and epidemiology ofColletotrichum acutatum sensu lato(C. chrysanthemi) causingCarthamus tinctoriusanthracnose vol.64, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12268
  2. Testing pathogen host specificity: a reciprocal field experiment in two types of tropical forest on Hainan, China vol.29, pp.06, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026646741300059X
  3. Antifungal activity of rimocidin and a new rimocidin derivative BU16 produced byStreptomyces mauvecolorBU16 and their effects on pepper anthracnose vol.120, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13071
  4. Pathogenicity and characterization of Colletotrichum lentis: A causal agent of anthracnose in common vetch (Vicia sativa) 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-017-1221-x
  5. Evaluation of Anthracnose Forecaster of an Integrated Pest Management System on Hot Pepper in the Fields vol.16, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2010.16.1.066
  6. Evaluation of Resistance to Colletotrichum acutatum in Pepper Genetic Resources vol.18, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2012.18.2.093
  7. Survival of pathogenic Colletotrichum isolates on dormant buds, twigs and fallen leaves of apple trees in commercial orchards vol.72, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17660/th2017/72.3.5