DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Equivalent Truss Model by Discretizing Continuum Structure

연속체의 이산화에 의한 등가트러스모델 개발

  • 이성용 (서울대학교 생태조경.지역시스템공학부 대학원) ;
  • 김태곤 (서울대학교 생태조경.지역시스템공학부 대학원) ;
  • 이정재 (서울대학교 조경.지역시스템공학부, 서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Published : 2009.05.31

Abstract

Generally, structures are analyzed as continuum. However, sometimes it is more efficient to analyze structure as a discrete model rather than as a continuum model in case of the structure has complex shape or loading condition. This study, therefore, suggests an improved analysis discrete model, named Equivalent Truss Model (further as "ETM"), which can obtain similar results with analyzing continuums analysis. ETM adopts a lattice truss to compose the members of the model, and analyses the structures. As a consequence, the ETM produced the identical outcome with the continuums analysis in section force of different structures and loading conditions. Similar results have been shown in internal stress analysis as well. Make use of that ETM is discrete, fractural path of beam was analyzed by ETM and the result was reasonable.

Keywords

References

  1. Albert Y. Zomaya, 1996. Parallel & Distributed Computing Handbook, McGraw-Hill
  2. Ali, M. A. & R. N. White, 2001. Automatic generation of truss model for optimal design of reinforced concrete structures, ACI Structural Journal, 98(4): 431-442
  3. Arthur H., Nilson, D. Darwin, & C. Dolan, 2003. Design of Concrete Structures, McGraw Hill Higher Education
  4. Brian. T & Z. Gurdal, 2000. Cellular Automata for Design of Two-Dimensional Continuum Structures, AIAA, Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization
  5. Galvez. J. C., M. Elices, G. V. Guinea & J. Planas. 1998. Mixed mode fracture of concrete under proportional and nonproportional loading, International Journal of Fracture: 267-284 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007578814070
  6. Gurdal. Z. & T. Brian, 2000. Cellular Automata for Design of Truss Structures with Linear and Nonlinear Response, AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and MAterials Conference & Exhibit
  7. Kang, Wonho, 1998. Truth and Fallacy of Truss Models, Journal of the Korea concrete institute 10(1): 32-39. (in Korean)
  8. Kwak, H. G. & S. H. Noh, 2003. Determination of Strut-and Tie Models using Evolutionary Structural Optimization, Korean Society of Civil engineers, 23 (1A): 1-11. (in Korean)
  9. Lee, M. S. and Y. S. Yoon, 1998. Application of Truss Model Concept in Current Structural Design Provisions. Journal of the Korea concrete institute 10(1): 10-19. (in Korean)
  10. Liang, Q. Q., Y. M. Xie, & G.P. Steven, 2000. Topology Optimization of Strut-and-Tie Models in Reinforced Concrete Structures Using an Evolutionary Procedure, ACI Structural Journal, 97(2): 322-330
  11. McGuire, William, Richard H. Gallagher, & Ronald D. Ziemian, 2000. Matrix Structural Analysis 2/e. Wiley
  12. Morsch, E., 1912. Der Eisenbetonbau, seine Theorie und Anwendung (Reinforced Concrete, Theory and Application), Verlag Konrad Wittwer, Stuttgart
  13. Ritter, W. 1899. Die Bauweise Hennebique (The Hennebique System), Schweizerische Bauzeitung, Bd. XXXIII, No.7, January
  14. Schlaich, J., & Schafer, K.,& Jennewein M.. 1987. Toward a consistent design of structural concrete. PCI journal: 75-149
  15. Schlaich, J., & Schafer, K., 1991. Design and Detailing of Structural Concrete Using Strut-and-Tie Models, The Structural Engineers, 69(6): 13
  16. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cellular_automata, Accessed 6 May. 2009
  17. Yi, H. J., 1998. Development of An Object Oriented Finite Element Distributed Processing System using Dynamic Load Balancing Technique, Master thesis, Seoul National University. (in Korean)
  18. Yun, Y. M. & B. H. Kim, 2006. Grid Strut-Tie Model Approach for Structural Concrete Design, Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 26(4): 621-637. (in Korean)

Cited by

  1. Development of a Truss Structure Analysis Model based on Cellular Automata and Object-oriented Simulation Environment vol.56, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2014.56.3.001