DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Determining Factors for Power Size of a Tractor

트랙터의 출력수준 결정에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석

  • Kim, Byoung-Gap (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Lee, Won-Ok (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Yeop (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kim, Hyeong-Kwon (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Kang, Chang-Ho (Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Academy of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Rhee, Joong-Yong (Dept. of Biosystems and Biomaterials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2009.02.25

Abstract

When a farmer buys a tractor, the power size of a tractor is determined by various factors such as farm size, farmer's age, farming type, topographical area of farm. Relationships between tractor selection and these factors were found. Three regression models were developed to analyze the relationship. Those models were an OLS-1 model (based on 567 samples having tractors), an OLS-2 model, and a Tobit model (both based on the 1,941 samples). Regression analysis results showed that farm size and farmer's age affected selection of power size for all models at an 1% significance level. It was also shown that some farming types also had significant relationships with the tractor power size. Upland cultivating farmers and livestock farmers had larger tractors than rice cultivating farmers, while orchard farmers had smaller tractors. As for the topographical area, only middle area had significant difference with plain area. Farmers who had a rice-transplanter or a combine had larger tractors than those who didn't.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, C. J. and K. U. Kim. 1997. The Principles of Farm Machinery. pp.29-35. Seoul National University Press. Seoul, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  2. Jensen, K, C. D. Clark, P. Ellis, B. English, J. Menard, M. Walsh and D. T. Ugarte. 2007. Farmer willingness to grow switchgrass for energy production. Biomass and Bioenergy 31(11-12):773-781 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.04.002
  3. Kim, B. G., S. Y. Shin, Y. B. Lee, D. H. Lee, H. J. Kim, J. W. Kang and B. S. Lee. 2004. Study on the utilization states of agricultural machinery. 2004 Research Report. pp.551-570. National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Suwon, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  4. Kim, K. U. 2005. Performance trend of Korean-made agricultural tractors. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 30(6):321-326. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2005.30.6.321
  5. Kim, S. H., H. S. Lee and M. S. Hyun. 2005. Using tobit model for investigating festival visitors' expenditures -Korean liquor and rice cake 2003-. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Studies 7(1):20-33. (in Korean)
  6. Ko, S. N. 2006. Rural-agricultural integrated plan and information strategy in Korea. Korea Industrial Economics Association 19(5):1761-1778. (in Korean)
  7. Korea Agricultural Machinery Industry Cooperative(KAMlCO). 2008. Prices of Agricultural Machinery. Seoul, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  8. Korea National Statistical Office (KNSO). 2008. Korean statistical information service. http://www.kosis.kr
  9. Kwon, O. S. and H. J. Kang. 2006. An analysis of the factors affecting off-farm work decisions and incomes. Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics 47(1):89-114. (in Korean)
  10. Lee, J. W. 2004. Econometrics. pp.5l5-568. Pakyoung Publish Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  11. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAP). 2006. Instructions on the Agriculture Promotion Area. Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  12. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF). 2007. Agricultural and Forestry Statistical Yearbook. Gwacheon, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  13. Park, S. H. 1993. Regression Analysis. Minyoung Publish Corporation, Seoul, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  14. Rural Development Corporation (RDC). 1991. Status of Agricultural Field Distribution by Topographical Area. Euwang, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
  15. Sall, S., D. Norman and A. M. Featherstone. 2000. Quantitative assessment of improved rice variety adoption: the farmer's perspective. Agricultural Systems 66(2):129-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00040-8
  16. Wooldridge, J. M. 2000. Introductory Econometrics: A Modem Approach. South-Western College Publishing, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. pp.540-546
  17. Yuh, Y. K. 2003. Determinants of households' investment assets. Korean Journal of Consumption Culture 6(1):1-17. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.1080/10253860302696
  18. Yun, D. S. and M. H. Kim. 1997. Nested logit analysis of urban workers'auto ownership choice. Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association 13(1):85-98. (in Korean)

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Operation Status for Agricultural Tractors Over 75 kW vol.36, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2011.36.6.397