DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of IT Utilization Level on Organizational Performance: The Differences among Large, Medium and Small-sized Enterprises

대.중.소규모 기업 간 정보기술 활용수준이 조직성과에 미치는 영향의 차이

  • 조세형 (건양대학교 기업정보관리학과)
  • Published : 2009.12.30

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to study whether there are differences in the relationship between IT utilization level and organizational performance among large, medium and small-sized enterprises. This study first assessed the immediate influence of IT utilization level on organizational performance, and then further examined the moderating effects of the organizational size and the environmental dynamism that had influences on the relationship between IT utilization level and organizational performance. The empirical test revealed that IT utilization level had significant impact on organizational performance in case of all sized enterprises. But, the sub-group analysis revealed that IT utilization level had no statistically significant impact on organizational performance in case of large enterprises despite of higher IT utilization level than small and medium-sized enterprises. The relationship between IT utilization level and organizational performance was not moderated significantly by environmental dynamism in case of all sized enterprises. But, the sub-group analysis revealed that environmental dynamism had significant moderating effect on the relationship between IT utilization level and organizational performance in case of large and small-sized enterprises when there was a high level of environmental dynamism.

단순히 정보기술에 대한 투자만으로는 조직성과의 성공적 달성을 기대할 수 없으며, 기업이 보유하고 있는 정보기술지식과 기업의 제반 활동에서 정보기술이 활용되고 있는 수준이 중요하다는 인식하에 연구를 시작하였다. 한편, 조직상황에 따라 정보기술 활용수준이 조직성과에 미치는 영향이 달라질 수 있음을 확인하기 위하여 내부 환경특성으로 조직규모와 외부 환경특성으로 환경역동성을 선택하여 조절효과를 살펴보았다. 조직규모는 대기업, 중기업 및 소기업으로 구분하여 차이를 살펴보았다. 85개 기업을 대상으로 실증분석을 실시한 결과 조직규모가 커질수록 정보기술 활용수준이 높아지는 것으로 나타났다. 전체적으로는 정보기술 활용수준이 조직성과에 유의적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나, 중기업 및 소기업과는 달궈 대기업의 경우는 유의적 영향을 나타내지 못하여 조직규모에 따라 차이가 있음을 보여주었다. 전체적으로 환경역동성이 정보기술 활용수준과 조직성과의 관계에 미치는 조절효과는 유의적이지 못한 것으로 나타났으나, 소기업과 대기업에서 환경역동성이 높은 경우에는 유의적인 조절효과를 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김병곤, 정영수, "관리특성과 조직특성이 EDI 구현에 미치는 상호작용 효과 분석," 경영정보학연구, 제13권, 제2호, 2003, pp.171-197.
  2. 김종우, 이지우, 백유성, “소기업의 응집력, 과업상호의존성, 협력 및 성과의 관계" 중소기업연구, 제27권, 제3호, 2005, pp.99-122.
  3. 김창수, “정보기술 지출이 조직의 경영성과에 미치는 영향. 한.미 기업을 대상으로 한 실증연구" 경영정보학연구, 제7권, 제1호, 1997, pp.25-48.
  4. 김효근, 유지현, 이현주, “기업 정보기술 투자의 통합 성과모형에 대한 실증연구" 경영 정보학연구, 제13권, 제1호, 2003, pp.119-140
  5. 서창교, 이형석, “기술혁신의 관점에서 전자 상거래 도입단계의 실증분석,” 경영정보학연구. 제10권, 제2호, 2000년 6월, pp.197-211.
  6. 성태경, “기업의 기술혁신성과 결정요인: 기업 규모와 외부 네트워크의 역할을 중심으로,” 대한경영학회지, 제18권, 제4호, 2005, pp.1767 - 1788.
  7. 유관희, 김영, 허광복, “중기업과 소기업간 정책자금지원의 재무적 성과: 지원 전 자산총액, 가동률, 부채비율을 중심으로" 중소기업 연구, 제27권, 제4호, 2005, pp.205- 223.
  8. 이국희, 김성근, 이주헌, 김용재, 이호준, “MIS 커리쿨럼 현황 및 발전모델," Information Systems Review, Vol. 9, No.3, 2007, pp. 1-32.
  9. 이상재, 한인구, “환경변수가 EDI 통제와 EDI 구현과의 관계에 미치는 영향에 관한 탐색적 연구" 경영정보학연구, 제9권, 제2호, 1999, pp.99-115.
  10. 이서구, 김종근, “전략적 지향성이 기업성과 에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 조직구조 및 조직규모의 조절효과를 중심으로" 기업경영 연구, 제16권, 제1호, 2009, pp.223-236
  11. 이석인, "중소기업의 환경과 전략의 적합성이 성과에 미치는 영향," 기업경영연구, 제12 권, 제1호, 2005년 6윌, pp.225- 238.
  12. 이승제, 한필구, 강병구, “정보기술 활용수준이 기업간 협업과 조직의 성과관계에 미치는 영향" Information Systems Review, 제 11권, 제2호, 2009, pp.67-90.
  13. 이원준, 강윤정, 김길선, “소기업의 기업간 전자적 연결 도입의도에 관한 연구: 기대가치와 거래관계특성의 관점" 경영정보학연구, 제15권, 제12호, 2005, pp.171 - 193
  14. 전성현, “정보기술 영향연구의 개념적 모형,” 경영정보학연구, 제6권, 제2호, 1996, pp.201-219.
  15. 정승환, 이형룡, “국내외 호텔기업의 정보기술활용 수준과 서비스품질 및 경영성과 간의 관계비교: 제주 동경지역 특급호텔 직원들의 정보화 수준 인식정도를 중심으로" 관광학 연구, 제31권, 제2호, 2007, pp.223-241.
  16. 조세형, 정용균, 김용원, “정보기술 투자효과에 관한 연구: 시차효과를 중심으로" 사회과학논문집, 건양대학교, 제7호, 2002, pp.203-215.
  17. 중소기업정보화경영원, 중소기업 정보화 수준평가, 2003.
  18. 통계청, 사업체 기초통계 조사보고서, 2006.
  19. 한경석, 노미현(1998), “전자상거래 도입과 확산의 실증적 통합모형: 한국 중소기업의 사례를 중심으로,” 중소기업연구, 제24권, 제 2호, 2002, pp.103-123.
  20. KDI 경제정보센터, “OECD 한국 기업정보화 정책 검토 보고서(요약본),“ 월간 나라경제, 2004년 7윌.
  21. Baldridge, J.V. and Burnham, R.A., "Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organization and Environmental Impacts", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, No.2, 1975, pp.165-176. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391692
  22. Barua, A., Kriebel, C.H, and Mukhopadhyay. T., "Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1995. pp. 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.1.3
  23. Berndt, E.R. and Morrison, C.J., "Assessing the Productivity of Information Technology Equipment in the U.S. Manufacturing Industries," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 3582, 1994.
  24. Bharadwaj, A.S., Bharadwaj, S.G. and Konsynski, B.R, "The Moderator Role of Information Technology in Firm Performance: A Conceptual Model and Research Propositions," Proceedings of ICIS, 1995, pp. 183- 188.
  25. Brynjolfsson, E., "The Productivity Paradox of Information Technology: Review and Assessment," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 12, 1993, pp. 67-77.
  26. Byrd, T. and Marshall, T., "Relating Information Technology Investment to Organizational Performance: a Causal Model Analysis," Omega International Management Science, Vol.25, No.1, 1997, pp.43-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(96)00040-0
  27. Cash, J.I., McFarlan, F.W., and McJenney, J.L., Corporate Information Systems management: Text and cases, Irwin, Homewood, IL, 1992.
  28. Chang, J.C. and King, W.R. "Measuring the Performance of Information Systems: A Functional Scorecard," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.22, No.1, 2005, pp.85-115. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/45317.22.3.20050601/88750.12
  29. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A., "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, 1990, pp.128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  30. Crowston, K. and Treacy, M.E., "Assessing the Impact of Information Technology on Enterprise Level Performance," Proceedings of ICIS, 1986, pp.299- 310.
  31. Damanpour, F., "The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors", Journal of Management, Vol.13, 1987, pp.675-688. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638701300408
  32. Das, S.R., Zahra, S.A., and Warketin, M.E., "Integrating the Content and Process of Strategic MIS Planning with Competitive Strategy," Decision Science, Vol. 22, 1991, pp.953-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb01902.x
  33. Dess, G.G. and Beard, D.W., "Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.29, No.1, 1984, pp.52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
  34. Duncan, R.B., "Characteristics of Organizational Environment and Environmental Uncertainty," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.17, no.3, 1972, pp.313-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
  35. Ein-Dor, P. and Segev, E., "Organizational Context and the Success of Management Information Systems," Management Science, Vol. 24, No.10, 1978, pp.1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.10.1064
  36. Emery, F.E. and Trist, E.L, "The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments," Human Relations, Vol.18, 1965, pp.21-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103
  37. Grover, V., Factors Influencing Adoption and Implementation of Customer Based Inter-organizational Systems, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1990.
  38. Grover, V and Goslar, M.D., "The Initiation, Adoption and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.10, No.1, 1993, pp.141-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1993.11517994
  39. Jun, B., "The Level of EC Utilization and its Impact on Firm Performance in SMEs," Journal of Information Technology Applications & Management, Vol.15, No.3, 2008, pp.127-152.
  40. Kast, F. and Rosenzweig, J., Contingency Views of Organization and Management, Chicago: Science Research Associates, 1973.
  41. Kauffman, R.J. and Weil, P., "An Evaluative Framework for Research on the Performance Effects of Information Technology Investment," Proceedings of ICIS, 1989, pp. 377-388.
  42. Kettinger, W.J., Grover, V., Guha, S., and Segars, A.H, "Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance," MIS Quarterly, March, 1994, pp.31-58.
  43. King, W.R. and Sabherwal, R., "The Factors Affecting Strategic Information Systems Application," Information and Management, Vol.23, No.4, 1992, pp.217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(92)90046-I
  44. Kivijarvi, H. and Saarinen, T, "Investment in Information Systems and the Financial Performance of the Firm", Information and Management, Vol. 28, No.2, 1995, pp.143-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)94022-5
  45. Lawrence, P.R and Lorsch, J.W., Organizations and Environment, Cambridge: Havard University Press, 1967.
  46. Laymond, L., "Organizational Context and Information Systems Success: A Contingency Approach," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.6, No.4, Spring, 1990, pp.5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1990.11517869
  47. Lederer, A.L. and Mendelow, A.L., "The Impact of the Environment of Information Systems," Information Systems Research, Vol.1, no.2, 1990, pp.205-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1.2.205
  48. Lederer, A.L., Mirchandani, D.A, and Sims, K., "the Search for Strategic Advantage from the World Wide Web," International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 5, No.4, 2001, pp.117-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044223
  49. Lehman, J.A, "Organization Size and Information Systems Sophistication." Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.2, No.3, Winter, 1985-1986, pp.78-86.
  50. Lenz, R, "Environment, Strategy, Organization Structure and Performance," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.1, No.3, 1980, pp.209-226. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250010303
  51. Li, N. and Ye, L.R, "Information Technology and Firm Performance: Linking with Environmental, Strategic and Managerial Contexts," Information and Management, Vol.35, No.1, 1999, pp.43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00075-5
  52. Loveman, G.W., "An Assessment of the Productivity Impact of Information Technologies," Information technology and the corporation of the 1990s: Research studies, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1994.
  53. Markus, M.L. and Soh, C, "Banking on Information Technology: Converting IT Spending into Firm Performance," In R.D. Banker, R.J. Kauffman, and M.A. Mahmood (Editors), Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Idea Group Publishing, 1993, pp.375-403.
  54. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., and Gurbaxani, V., "Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No.2, 2004, pp. 283-322. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636
  55. Menachemi, N., Burkhardt, J.H., Shewchul, R.M., Burke, D.E., and Brooks, R.G., "Effect of Hospital IT Capabilities on Financial Performance," AcademyHealth Meeting Abstracts, 22: abstract no.4417, 2005.
  56. Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H., "Strategy Making and Environment: The Third Link," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, No.3, 1983, pp.221-235.
  57. Mills, D.E. and Schumann, L., "Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand," American Economic Review, Vol.75, 1985, pp.758-767.
  58. Mitra, S. and Chaya, A.K., " Analyzing Cost-Effectiveness of Organizations: The Impact of Information Technology Spending," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No.2, 1996, pp. 29-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580539608906969
  59. Muller, D.C. and Tiltom, J.E., "Research and Development Costs as a Barrier to Entry," Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 2, No.4, 1979, pp. 570-579. https://doi.org/10.2307/133844
  60. Naver, J.C. and Slater, S.F., "The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, 1990, pp.20-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251757
  61. Poon, S. and Swatman, P., "A Longitudinal Study of Expectations in Small Business Internet Commerce," International journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol. 3, No.3, 1999, pp.21-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.1999.11518339
  62. Porter, M.E., "The Structure within Industries and Companies' Performance," Review of Economics and Statistics, 1979, pp.214-227.
  63. Porter, M.E., The Competitive Strategy : Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, Free Press, 1980.
  64. Premkumar, G. and King, W.R., "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems Planning: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, Vol.5, No.2, 1994, pp.75-109. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.5.2.75
  65. Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., and Crum, M., "Determinants of EDI Adoption in the Transportation Industry," European Journal of Information Systems, Vol.6, No.2, 1997, pp.107-121. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000260
  66. Ray, G., Muhanna, W.A, and Barney, J.B., "Information Technology and the Performance of the Customer Service Process: A Reource- Based Analysis," MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.4, 2005, pp.625-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148703
  67. Reich, B.H. and Benbasat, I., "An Empirical Investigation of Factors Influencing the Success of Customer-Oriented Strategic Systems," Information Systems Research, September, 1990, pp.325-347.
  68. Rifkin, G., "CEO's Give Credit for Today but Except More for Tomorrow," Computerworld, April, 1989, pp. 75-88.
  69. Romeo, A, "Inter-industry and Inter-firm Differences in the Rate of Diffusion of an Innovation," The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol.4, No.2, 1975, pp. 311-319.
  70. Sauer, C. and Yetton, P., "The Dynamics of Fit and the Fit of Dynamics : Aligning IT in a Dynamic Organization," Proceedings of ICIS, 1994, pp.41-50.
  71. Scherer, F.M., "The Determinants of Industrial Plant in Six nations," Review of Economics and Statistics, 1973, pp.135-1445.
  72. Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D., Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance(3rd ed.), 1990.
  73. Schumpeter, J.A., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 1942.
  74. Shin, N., "Does Information Technology Improve Coordination? An Empirical Analysis," Logistic Information Management, Vol. 12, No. 1/2, 1999, pp. 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576059910256592
  75. Sircar, S., Turnbow, J.L., and Bordoloi, B., "A Framework for Assessing the Relationship Between Information Technology Investments and Firm Performance," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.16, No.4, 2000, pp.69-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2000.11518266
  76. Soh, C. and Markus, M.L., "How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis," Proceedings of ICIS, 1995, pp.29-41.
  77. Stoel, M.D. and Muhanna, W.A, "IT Capabilities and Firm Performance: A Contingency Analysis of the Role of Industry and IT Capability Type," Information & Management, Vol.46, 2009, pp.181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.10.002
  78. Strassmann, P.A, The Business Value of Computers: An Executive's Guide, Information Economics Press, 1990.
  79. Tan, J. and Li, M., "Effects of Ownership Types on Environment-Strategy Configuration in China's Emerging Transactional Economy," Advances in International Comparative Management, Vol.11, 1996, pp.217-250.
  80. Teo, T.S.H., Tan, M., and Buk, W.K., "A Contingency Model of Internet Adoption in Singapore". International Journal off Electronic Commerce, Vol.2, No.2, 1977, pp.95-118.
  81. Thompson, J.D., Organizations in Action, New York, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  82. Thong, J.Y.L., Yap, C. and Raman, K.S., "Top Management Support, External Expertise and Information Systems Implementation m Small Businesses," Information Systems Research, Vol.7, No.2, June 1996, pp.248-267. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.2.248
  83. Trauth, E.M., Farwell, D.W., and Lee, D., "The IS Expectation Gap: Industry Expectations Versus Academic Preparation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No.3, 1993, pp. 293-307. https://doi.org/10.2307/249773
  84. Venkatraman, M., "The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research," Academy of Management Review, Vol.14, No.3, 1989, pp.423-444. https://doi.org/10.2307/258177
  85. Weill, P., "The Role and Value of Information Technology Infrastructure; Some Empirical Observations," Working Paper Number 240, Center for Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.
  86. Weill, P. and Olson, M.H., "An Assessment of Contingency Theory," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.6, No.1, 1989, pp.59-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399018908960144
  87. White, L.J., "The Determinants of the Relative Importance of Small Business," Review of Economics and Statistics, 1982, pp.319- 331.