한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제48권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-20
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지

교구를 활용한 중학교 공간능력 향상을 위한 수업에서 학습의 효과

An Effect of Students' Learning for Spatial Ability Using a Geometric Manipulative

  • Choi-Koh, Sang-Sook (Dept. of Mathematics Education, Dankook University) ;
  • Jung, In-Chul (Dept of Mathematics Education, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Man-Goo (Dept of Mathematics Education, Seoul National University of Education)
  • 발행 : 2009.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The study was to investigate an effect of students' learning for enhancing spatial ability, using a geometric manipulative recently designed. A mixed methodology was chosen to achieve the purpose of the study. To find students' achievement, 152 of the 8th graders in Kyunggi Do participated in data collection. At the same time. students' performance of the class was videotaped and analyzed to see students' responses, The results showed that the effect of using the manipulative was statistically significant at level, p<.05 to enhance the spatial ability. Specifically, in comparison of each component. spatial orientation was more effective than spatial visualization. In the spatial orientation, the part of field was more effective than the reorganized whole. It showed that students were given more opportunities to find mathematical properties and relations between 2nd and 3rd-dimensional figures through their intuitive observation, and also the manipulative helped the students find the property of the part of field because it gave an easy way to manipulate the property of the find parts of whole which was composed of the frame of the solid figures without surfaces. In using the manipulative, students were very flexible in finding the number of plane figures, but the relations between the 2nd and 3rd dimensional figures need to be clearly guided in consideration of the characteristics of the manipulative, based on the definitions of geometric properties(cf. points can make lines, not surfaces directly).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강순자.고상숙 (1999). 공간 능력을 신장하기 위한 기하 학습자료 개발: GSP를 이용하여 정다면체 구성. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>. 38(2), pp.179-187.
  2. 고상숙.홍인숙.박혜선 (2008). 기하사고의 공간능력 향상을 위한 교구활용 수업 의 효과. 수학교육학논총, 32, pp.57-84.
  3. 권오남.박경미.임형.허라금 (1996). 공간능력에서의 성별차이에 관한 연구. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 A <수학교육>, 35(2), pp.125-141.
  4. 김유경.방정숙 (2007). 초등학교 6학년 학생들의 공간감각과 공간추론능력 실태조사. 학교수학, 9(3), pp.353-373
  5. 신현성 (2004). 수학과 수업모형 및 설계, 서울: 경문사.
  6. 임인재.김신영.박현정 (2003). 교육.심리.사회 연구를 위한 통계방법, 서울: 학연사.
  7. 전평국.정부용 (2003). 공간시각화에서 교구 역할. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 15, pp.87-92.
  8. 한기완 (2001). 공간감각을 기르기 위한 교구활용방안. 한국수학교육학회지 시리즈 E <수학교육 논문집>, 12, pp.57-66.
  9. Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, pp.47-60. https://doi.org/10.2307/749456
  10. Burnett, S. A., Lane, D. M., & Dratt, L. M. (1979). Spatial visualization and sex differences in quantitative ability. Intelligence 3, pp.345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-2896(79)90003-5
  11. Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (ED.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning(pp.420-464). New York: Macmillan.
  12. Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N., (1973). Chrometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase(Ed.), Visual Information Processing(pp.75-176). New York Academic Press.
  13. Costa, A. & Loveall, R. (2002). The legacy of Hilda Taba. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 18(1), pp.56-62.
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
  15. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. w., Harmon, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  16. Fennema, E. (1979). Woman and girls in mathematics-equity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 5, pp.126-139.
  17. Fennema, E,. & Sherman, J. (1977). Sex related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and affective factors. American Education Research Journal, 14, pp.51-71. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312014001051
  18. French, J. W. (1951). The description of aptitude and achievement tests in terms of rotated factors. Psychometric Monographs, (No 5). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
  20. Gay, D. (1998). Geometry by discovery. New York: Wiley.
  21. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 11(3), pp.255-274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
  22. Grobecker, B., & De Lisi, R. (2000). An investigation of spatial-geometrical understanding in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, pp.7-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511096
  23. Hannafin, R. D,. & Truxaw, M. P. (2008). Effects of spatial ability and instructional program on geometry achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(3), pp.148-156. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.101.3.148-157
  24. Kaufmann, G. (1990). Imagery effects on problem solving. In P.J.Hampson, D.F. Marks, & J. R. E. Richardson(Eds.), Imagery, Current development (pp. 169-196). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  25. Kersh, M. E., & Cook, K. H. (1979, August). Improving mathematics ability and attitude, a manual. Seattle: Mathematics Learning Institute, University of Washington.
  26. Lohman, D. F., & Kyllonen, P, C. (1983). Individual differences in solution strategy on spatial tasks. In R. F. Dillon & R. R. Schmek(Eds.), Individual differences in cognition(pp.105-135). New York: Academic Press.
  27. Lohman, D. F. (1979). Spatial ability: Individual differences in speed and level(Technical Report No.9). Stanford, CA: Aptitude Research Project of School of Education, Stanford University.
  28. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangular- Educational Researcher, 17(2), pp.13-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017002013
  29. Mcgee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 889-918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.5.889
  30. Piaget, J. P. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
  31. Phunlapthawee, K. (2000). An analysis of construct structures for spatial and error pattern scores
  32. Swanson, S. (1992). Mixed-method triangulation: Theory and practice compared Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  33. Taba, H., Durkin, M., Fraenkel, J., & McNaughton, A. (1971). A Teacher's Handbook to Elementary Social Studies. An Inductive Approach. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
  34. Tartre, L. A. (1984). The role of spatial orientation skill in the solution of mathematics problems and associated sex-related differences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  35. Tartre, L. A. (1990). Spatial Orientation Skill and Mathematical Problem Solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(3), pp.216-229. https://doi.org/10.2307/749375