DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Fermented Soy Protein on Nitrogen Balance and Apparent Fecal and Ileal Digestibility in Weaned Pigs

  • Yoo, J.S. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Jang, H.D. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, J.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, J.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Department of Animal Resource and Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2008.05.02
  • Accepted : 2009.03.21
  • Published : 2009.08.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of providing fermented soy protein to weaned pigs on nitrogen balance and apparent fecal and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of AA. Four weaned ((Yorkshire${\times}$Landrace)${\times}$Duroc) barrows (BW = 6.58${\pm}$0.98 kg), surgically fitted with a simple T-cannula approximately 15 cm prior to the ileo-cecal junction, were fed four diets according to 4${\times}$4 Latin square design. Diets were a basal diet supplemented with one of the following: 3% SDPP (spray dried plasma protein), 5% RBP (soy protein fermented by Lactobacillus spp.), 5% PSP (soy protein fermented by Aspergillus oryzae and Bacillus subtilis), and 2.5% RPP (2.5% RBP+2.5% PSP). No differences were observed in DM and N intakes among treatments. However, the level of urine excretion was greater in the RPP group than in the PSP group. Additionally, fecal DM excretion, fecal N concentration and fecal N excretion were increased in the RBP, PSP and RPP groups when compared with the SDPP group (p<0.05). Furthermore, total excretion was increased in the RPP group when compared with the PSP group (p<0.05). In addition, N absorption and the N absorption ratio were higher in the SDPP group than in the RPP group (p<0.05). Moreover, the DM and N digestibilities were lower in the RBP, PSP and RPP groups than in the SDPP group (p<0.05), and the ash and energy digestibilities were higher in the SDPP and RBP groups than in the PSP and RPP groups (p<0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the DM, N, Ash, Ca, P or ileal digestibilities among treatments, although the energy digestibility was higher in the SDPP group than the RBP group (p<0.05). In addition, the apparent ileal digestibilities of essential amino acids (Arg, His, Iso, Leu, Lys, Phe, Thr, and Val) were significantly higher in the SDPP group than in the other groups (p<0.05), and the levels of Ala, Cys, Glu and Try were greater in the SDPP treatment group than the RBP, PSP and RPP groups (p<0.05). Additionally, the levels of Asp, Gly and Ser were higher in the SDPP group than the PSP and RPP groups, and the level of Pro was higher in the SDPP group than the RPP group (p<0.05). Finally, total non-essential amino acid and total amino acid digestibility were higher in the SDPP group than in the other treatments (p<0.05). Taken together, the results of this study indicate that animal protein is more bioavailable than plant protein. However, the N absorption ratio and ileal digestibility were found to be similar in the SDPP and RBP groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, R. L., J. J. Rackis and W. H. Tallent. 1979. Biologically active substances in soy products. In: Soy protein and human nutrition (Ed. H. L. Wilcke, D. T. Hopkins and D. H. Waggle). Academic Press, New York. pp. 209-233
  2. AOAC. 1994. Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC
  3. Armstrong, D. G. and H. H. Mitchell. 1955. Protein nutrition and the utilization of dietary protein at different levels of intake by growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 14:49-68 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1955.14149x
  4. Burnham, L. L., I. H. Kim, J. O. Kang, H. W. Rhee and J. D. Hancock. 2000. Effects of sodium sulfate and extrusion on the nutritional value of soybean products for nursery pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1584-1592 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1584
  5. Chea, B. J., I. K. Han, J. H. Kim, C. J. Yang, J. D. Hancock, I. H. Kim and D. A. Anderson. 1999. Effects of dietary protein sources on ieal digestibility and growth performance for earlyweaned pig. Livest. Product. Sci. 58:45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00184-5
  6. Li, D. F., S. Y., Qiao, J. Y. Jiang, H. J. Zhou, J. S. Li and P. A. Thacker. 2003. Effects of moist extruded full-fat soybeans on gut morphology and mucosal cell turnover time of weanling pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:63-69 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.63
  7. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  8. Giesting, D. W. and R. A. Easter. 1991. Effect of protein source and fumaric acid supplementation on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients by young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 69:2497-2503 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)00750-4
  9. Hachmeiste, K. A. and D. Y. Fung. 1993. Temoeh: a moldmodified indigenous fermented food made from soybeans and/or cereal grains. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 19(3):137-188 https://doi.org/10.3109/10408419309113527
  10. Hancock, J. D., A. J. Lewis and E. R. Peo, Jr. 1989. Effects of ethanol extraction on the utilization of soybean protein by growing rats. Nutr. Rep. Int. 39:813-821 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00782-I
  11. Hancock, J. D., E. R. Peo, Jr., A. J. Lewis and J. D. Crenshaw. 1990. Effects of ethanol extraction and duration of heat treatment of soybean flakes on the utilization of soybean protein by growing rats and pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 68:3233-3243 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68103233x
  12. Jones, D. B., J. D. Hancock, J. L. Nelsson and D. F. Li. 1989. Effect of replacing milk products with a soybean protein isolate milk replacer in the diet for nursery pigs. Kansas State Univ. Swine Day Rep. p. 54
  13. Kiers, J. L., A. E. A. Van laeken, F. M. Rombouts and M. J. R. Nout. 2000. In vitro digestibility of Bacillus fermented soya bean. Int. J. Food. Microbiol. 60:163-169 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00308-1
  14. Kim, B. N., J, L. Yang and Y. S. Song. 1999. Physiological functions of chungkukjang. Food Ind. Nutr. 4:40-46
  15. Lee, H. J. 1998. Health functional peptides from soybean foods, Korea Soybean Digest. 15:16-22
  16. Li, S., W. C. Sauer and R. T. Hardin. 1994. Effect of fiber on amino acid digestibility in young pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 74:327-333 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas94-044
  17. Makkink, C. A. 1993. Of piglets, dietary proteins and pancreatic protease. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands
  18. Min, B. J. 2006. Nutrition value of fermented soy protein (FSP) and effect of FSP on performance and meat quality of pigs. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Bio Resources Science Swine Nutrition and Feed Graduate School, Dankook University, Korea
  19. Mital, B. K. and S. K. Garg. 1990. Tempeh-technology and food value. Food reviews International 6:213-224 https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129009540867
  20. Osborne, T. B. and L. B. Mendel. 1917. The use of soybean as food. J. Biol. Chem. 32:369-387
  21. Reddy, N. R. and M. D. Pierson. 1994. Reduction in antinutritional and toxic components in plant food by fermentation. Food Research International 27:281-290 https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-9969(94)90096-5
  22. Sarkar, P. K., L. J. Jones, G. S. Craven, S. M. Somerset and C. Palmer. 1997 Amino acid profiles of kinema, a soybeanfermented food. Food Chemistry. 59:69-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00118-5
  23. Sauer, W. C., H. Jorgensen and R. Berzins. 1983. A modified nylon bag technique for determining apparent digestibilities of protein in feedstuffs for pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 63:233-237 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas83-027
  24. SAS. 1996. SAS user's guide. Release 6. 12 edition. SAS Inst Inc Cary NC. USA
  25. Sohn, K. S., C. V. Maxwell, D. S. Buchanan and L. L. Southern. 1994. Improved soybean protein sources for early-weaned pigs: I. Effects on performance and total tract amino acid digestibility. J. Anim. Sci. 72:622-630 https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.723622x
  26. Steinkraus, K. H. 1996. Hand book of indigenous fermented foods. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 1-94
  27. Thomson, J. E., E. E. Jones and E. J. Eisen. 1995. Effects of spraydried porcine plasma protein on growth traits and nitrogen and energy balance in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2340-2346 https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382340x
  28. Yun, J. H., I. K. Kwon, J. D. Lohakare, J. Y. Chio, J. S. Yong, J. Zheng, W. T. Cho and B. J. Chae. 2005. Comparative efficacy of plant and animal protein sources on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, morphology and caecal microbiology of early-weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1285-1293 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.1285

Cited by

  1. Effects of fermented soybean meal on growth performance, diarrheal incidence and immune-response of neonatal calves vol.81, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00760.x
  2. Effects of keratinase supplementation of corn-soybean meal based diets on apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in growing pigs and serum amino acids, cytokines, immunoglobulin levels and loin muscle area in nursery pigs vol.65, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2011.586140
  3. Effects of different fermented soy protein and apparent ileal digestible lysine levels on weaning pigs fed fermented soy protein-amended diets vol.83, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00966.x
  4. Comparison of Traditional and Fermented Soybean Meals as Alternatives to Fish Meal in Hybrid Striped Bass Feeds vol.75, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/15222055.2012.756440
  5. Ileal digestibility of nutrients and amino acids in unfermented, fermented soybean meal and canola meal for weaning pigs vol.86, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12305
  6. Effect of fermentation of soybean meal with varying protein solubility on ileal digestibility of nutrients in growing pigs vol.56, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14842
  7. The effects of fermented soybean meal on immunophysiological and stress-related parameters in Holstein calves after weaning vol.95, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5317
  8. Effect of extrusion on protein quality, antinutritional factors, and digestibility of complementary diet from quality protein maize and soybean protein concentrate vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12508
  9. Effects of Fermented Soybean Meal on Immune Response of Weaned Calves with Experimentally Induced Lipopolysaccharide Challenge vol.24, pp.7, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10419
  10. Effects of Keratinase on Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Intestinal Morphology, Intestinal Ecology and Inflammatory Response of Weaned Piglets Fed Diets with Different Levels of Crude Protein vol.24, pp.12, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11132
  11. Effects of dietary protease on immune responses of weaned pigs vol.62, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.174