Efficacy of Wood Preservatives Formulated with Okara and Its Microscopic Analysis

두부비지 방부제의 방부효능 및 현미경적 분석

  • Kim, Ho-Yong (Department of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, In-Gyu (Department of Forest Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Sye Hee (Department of Forest Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Oh, Sei Chang (Department of Forest Resources, Daegu University) ;
  • Youn, Young Ho ;
  • Yang, In (Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 김호용 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 환경재료과학전공) ;
  • 최인규 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 산림과학부 환경재료과학전공) ;
  • 안세희 (대구대학교 생명환경대학 산림자원학과) ;
  • 오세창 (대구대학교 생명환경대학 산림자원학과) ;
  • 윤영호 ((주) KCI) ;
  • 양인 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원)
  • Received : 2008.11.12
  • Accepted : 2009.01.31
  • Published : 2009.05.25

Abstract

As a substitute for CCA, which is inhibited due to its environmental pollution and human harmfulness, and CuAz and ACQ with a high cost, okara-based wood preservatives were formulated with okara hydrolyzates using copper sulfate and/or borax as a metal salt. The efficacy of the preservatives and X-ray microanalysis of wood specimens treated with the preservatives were examined to confirm the potential of the okara-based wood preservatives. Most of the preservatives showed excellent decay resistance against brown-rot fungi, Postia placenta and Gloeophyllum trabeum. The efficacy was improved when the acid concentration and temperature used for the hydrolysis of okara increased. In addition, when borax was added into copper sulfate/okara hydrolyzates preservative formulations, any decay was not found in the specimens. From the microscopic observation of the specimens treated with okara-based wood preservatives, it seems that okara is contributed to the fixing of metal salts in wood blocks. Therefore, it is speculated that okara-based wood preservatives can effectively protect wood against fungal attack as CuAz, and that the preservatives are sufficient to use as an alternative wood preservative of CCA, ACQ and CuAz.

최근 환경오염 및 인체 유해성으로 사용이 제한 받고 있는 목재방부제인 chromated copper arsenate (CCA) 그리고 CCA의 대체방부제로 사용되고 있는 고가의 Copper Azole (CuAz)과 alkaline Copper quaternary (ACQ)를 대체하기 위하여 유기폐기물인 두부비지, $CuSO_4$ 그리고/또는 Borax를 이용하여 조제하였다. 이렇게 조제된 두부비지 목재방부제의 사용 가능성을 확인하기 위하여 갈색부후균에 대한 방부효능을 조사하고, 그 방부제가 처리된 목재시편을 FE-SEM과 EDS를 이용하여 현미경적 분석을 수행하였다. 두부비지 방부제로 처리한 목재시편은 Postia placenta와 Gloeophyllum trabeum에 대해 우수한 방부효능을 보였으며, 비지의 가수분해를 위해 사용된 산농도 및 온도의 증가, 그리고 Borax의 첨가는 방부효능을 향상시켰다. 두부비지 방부제로 처리된 시편의 현미경적 관찰을 통하여 비지 가수분해물과 구리의 반응을 통해 용탈과정 중에 용출에 대한 내성을 향상시킨다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 상기 결과를 토대로 두부비지 방부제가 경제성과 환경적 측면에서 목재방부제로 사용될 수 있다고 생각한다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 농림부

References

  1. 강희석, 윤현명, 장용철. 2006. CCA-방부목재 매립 컬럼 내에서의 비소, 구리 크롬의 배출특성. 한국폐기물학회 2006년 추계학술연구회발표논문집: 60∼64
  2. 윤현명, 강희석, 장용철, 황혜진. 2005. CCA-방부처리 목재 소각재로부터의 비소, 크롬 및 구리의 용출특성에 관한 연구. 한국폐기물학회지. 22(8): 487∼490
  3. 이동흡, 이명재, 강창호, 여운홍. 2000. 정착 양생된 CCFZ, ACQ, CuAz 방부처리재에서 약제 주성분의 용탈성. 목재공학. 2000년 추계학술발표논문집, pp. 120∼123
  4. 이동흡, 오형민, 강창호, 여운홍. 2000. 수용성 목재방부제 CCFZ, ACQ 및 CuAz의 방부성능평가. 목재공학. 2000년 추계학술발표논문집, pp. 115∼119
  5. 김호용, 최인규, 안세희, 오세창, 홍창영, 민병철, 양인. 2008. 두부비지를 이용한 목재 방부제의 사용가능성 평가. 목재공학. 36(1): 110∼113 https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2008.36.1.110
  6. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007. Chromated Copper Arsenate (CCA) Pesticides. US EPA. http://www.epa.gov/oppad001/reregistration/cca/
  7. European Union Commission. 2007. CCA-Treated Timber Regulations. European Union. http://homepage. mac.com/herinst/CCAtimber/ regulations/Europe.html#restrictions
  8. Nicholas, D. D. and T. P. Schultz. 1994. Biocides that have potential as wood preservatives–An overview, wood preservation in the 90's and beyond. Forest Products Society. Proceeding 7308: 169∼173
  9. Shi, J. L., D. Kocaefe, T. Amburgey, and J. Zhang. 2007. A comparative study on brown- rot fungus decay and subterranean termite resistance of thermally-modified and ACQ- C-treated wood. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 65(5): 353∼358 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-007-0178-4
  10. Bland, D. E. 1963. Sorption of copper by wood constituents. Nature 200: 267 https://doi.org/10.1038/200267a0
  11. Lin, S. Y. 1993. Method for the treatment of wood with metal-lignin salts. U. S. Patent 5,246,739
  12. Laks, P. E., P. A. McKaig, and R. W. Hemingway. 1998. Flavonoid biocides: Wood preservatives based on condensed tannins. Holzforschung 42(5): 299∼306 https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1988.42.5.299
  13. Thevenon, M. F., A. Pizzi, and J. P. Haluk. 1998. Protein borates as non-toxic, long-term, widespectrum, ground-contact wood preservatives. Holzforschung 52(3): 241∼248 https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.3.241
  14. Yang, I., M. L. Kuo, and D. J. Myers. 2006. Soy-protein combined with copper and boron compounds for providing effective wood preservation. JAOCS 83(3): 239∼245 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-006-1199-6
  15. Yang, I., M. L. Kuo, D. J. Kuo, I. G. Choi, and S. H. Ahn. 2006. Environmentally benign and costcompetitive wood preservation from soy protein nproducts. KSWST. 2006 Proceedings of the Korean Society of Wood Science and Technology pp. 82∼83
  16. American Society for Testing and Materials. 2005. Standard test method for wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken, PA, D 1413-05b: 3$\sim$4 https://doi.org/10.1520/D1413-05B
  17. Yoon, C. J. and K. W. Kim. 2008. Anatomical descriptions of silicified woods from Madagascar and Indonesia by scanning electron microscopy. Micron 39(7): 825∼831 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2007.12.011
  18. Johnson, B. R. and D. I. Gutzmer. 1978. Ammoniacal copper borate: a new treatment for wood preservation, For. Prod. J. 28(2): 33∼36
  19. DeGroot, R. C. and B. Woodward. 1999. Using copper-tolerant fungi to biodegrade wood treated with copper-based wood preservatives, Int. Biodet. & Biodeg. 44: 17∼27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(99)00047-5