Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE BETWEEN LOW AND HIGH FLOWABLE RESINS IN CLASS V CAVITY

5급 와동에서 저유동성과 고유동성 레진의 변연 미세누출 비교

  • Bae, Sang-Bae (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Myeong-Seon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Seokang university)
  • 배상배 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 이명선 (서강정보대학교 치위생과)
  • Published : 2009.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the microleakage of low and high viscosity flowable resins in class V cavities applied with 1-step adhesives. Forty Class V cavities were prepared on the cervices of buccal and lingual surfaces of extracted molar teeth and divided into four groups (n=8). Cavities were restored with AQ Bond Plus /Metafil Flo $\alpha$, G-Bond/ UniFil LoFlo Plus (Low flow groups), AQ Bond Plus/Metafil Flo and G-Bond/UniFil Flow (High flow group), respectively. Specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours, and bisected longitudinally. They were observed microleakages at the enamel and dentinal margins. In conclusion, the low viscosity flowable resins showed lower marginal microleakage than do the high vis cosity flowable resins in class V cavities.

이 연구는 1단계 자가부식 접착제와 저유동성 및 고유동성 레진을 이용한 5급 와동 수복물에서 법랑질과 상아질 변연의 미세 누출 차이를 상호 비교하기 위하여 시행하였다. 40개의 대구치의 협, 설면 치경부에 5급 와동을 형성하고, 8개씩 무작위로 선택하여 사용된 유동성 레진에 따라 5개의 군으로 분류하여 각 군의 와동을 유동성 레진으로 충전하였다 (대조군: Filtek Z 350, M-LF 군: Metafil Flo $\alpha$, U-LF 군: Unifil LoFlo Plus, M-HF군: Metafil Flo, U-HF군: Unifil Flow). 각 군의 치아를 2% methylene blue용액에 24시간 동안 침적시킨 다음, 협면과 설면의 5급 수복물의 중앙부가 통과되도록 절단하였다. 각 군의 절단 시편에서 유동성 레진 수복물의 법랑질과 상아질 변연부를 광학 입체현미경 하에서 색소침투 정도를 관찰하여 미세누출 점수를 평가하였다. 본 연구의 결과, 1단계 자가부식 접착제와 유동성 레진을 이용하여 5급 와동을 충전한 경우, 고유동성 레진보다 저유동성 레진이 낮은 변연 미세누출을 나타내어 5급 와동에서 저유동성 레진의 사용이 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Atash R, Abbeele AV. Sealing ability and bond strength of four contemporary adhesives to enamel and to dentine. Am J Pediatric Dent 4:185-190, 2005
  2. Keyf F, Yalcin F. The weight change of various lightcured restorative materials stored in water. J Contemp Dent Prac 6:1-7, 2005
  3. Park JG, Lim BS, Lee IB. Cuspal deflection in class V cavities restored with domposite resins. The J KACD 33:83-89, 2008 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.2.083
  4. Ahn HR, Kim HC, Hur B, Park JK. The effectr of restorative materials on the stress distribution of class V composite resin restoration- a 3D finite elenment investigation. The J KACD 31:20-29, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.1.020
  5. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pedia Dent 22:221-229, 1998
  6. Celik C, Ozgunaltay G, Attar N. Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: Twoyear results. Oper Dent 32:313-321, 2007 https://doi.org/10.2341/06-93
  7. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 14:361-366, 2001
  8. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh B, Carbalho R, Miller M. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after poly-erization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent 17:271-278, 2004
  9. Lee KW, Choung SJ, Han YC, Son HH, Um JM, Oh MH, Cho BH. Prospective clinical evaluation of three different bonding systems in class V resin restoration with or without mechanical retention. The J KACD 31:300-311, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.4.300
  10. Attar N, Korkmaz. Effect of two light-emitting diode(LED) and one halogen curing light on the marginal leakage of class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Prac 8:1-10, 2007
  11. Pardi V, Sinhoreti MAC, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB, Meneghim MC. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of different materials used as pit-and-fissure sealants. Braz Dent J 17:49-52, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402006000100011
  12. Miguez PA, Pereira PNR, Foxton RM, Walter R, Nunes MF, Swift Jr EJ. Effect of flowable resin on bond strength and gap formation in class I restorations. Dent Mater 20:839-845, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.10.015
  13. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29:713-719, 2004
  14. Roberts HW, Charlton DG, Murchison DF. Repair of non-carious amalgam margin defects. Oper Dent 26:237-276, 2001
  15. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental resto- rations. Oper Dent 22:173-185, 1997
  16. Hwang SJ, Shin DH. Estimation of relation between technaiques of dye pentration for microleakage and SEM evaluation for marginal adaptation of the restoration. The J KACD 31:337-343, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2006.31.5.337
  17. Youngson CC, Glyn Jones JC, Magogue M, Smith IS. In vitro dentinal penetration by tracers used in microleakage studies. Int Endod J 31:90-99, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00132.x
  18. Stavridakis MM, Dietschi D, Krejci I. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials. Oper Dent 30:118-128, 2005
  19. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15: 128-137, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
  20. Takamizawa T, Yamamoto A, Inoue N, Tsujimoto A, Oto T, Irokawa K, Miyazaki M. Influence of light intensity on contraction stress of flowable resins. J Oral Science 50:37-43, 2008 https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.50.37
  21. Irie M, Hatanaka K, Suzuki K, Watts DC: Immediate versus water-storage performance of class V flowable composite restoratives. Dent Mater 22:875-883, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.001