A Comparative Study of Gait Characteristics between Single Axis Foot and Energy Storing Foot for Sports in Trans-tibial Amputee

하퇴절단자용 단축식 발과 스포츠용 에너지 저장형 발 보행 특성 비교연구

  • Chang, Yun-Hee (Korea Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Engineering Center) ;
  • Bae, Tae-Soo (Korea Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Engineering Center) ;
  • Kim, Shin-Ki (Korea Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Engineering Center) ;
  • Mun, Mu-Seong (Korea Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Engineering Center)
  • Published : 2009.02.25

Abstract

This study examined the differences in spatio-temporal parameters, joint angle, ground reaction force (GRF), and joint power according to the changes of gait speed for trans-tibial amputees to investigate the features of the energy-storing foot for sports. The subjects walked at normal speed and at fast speed, wearing a single-axis type foot (Korec) and an energy-storing foot for sports (Renegade) respectively. The results showed that Renegade yielded faster gait speed as well as more symmetric gait pattern, compared to Korec. However, as gait speed was increased, there was no significant difference in kinematics, ground reaction force, and joint power between two artificial foots. This was similar to the results from previous studies regarding the energy-storing foot, where the walking velocity and gait symmetry have been improved. Nevertheless, the result of this study differed from the previous ones which reported that joint angle, joint power, and GRF increased as the gait speed increased except spatio-temporal parameters.

Keywords

References

  1. Sanderson, D. J. and Martin, P. E., "Joint Kinetics in Unilateral Below-Knee Amputee Patients During Running," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 77, No. 12, pp. 1279-1285, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90193-8
  2. Czerniecki, J. M., Gitter, A. and Munro, C., "Joint Moment and Muscle Power Output Characteristics of Below Knee Amputees During Running: the Influence of Energy Storing Prosthetic feet," J. Biomech., Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 63-75, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(91)90327-J
  3. Lehman, J. F., Boswell-Bessette, S., Dralle, A., Questard, K. and deLateur, B. J., "Comprehensive Analysis of Energy Storing Prosthetic Feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot versus Standard SACH Foot," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 74, No. 11, pp. 1225-1231, 1993
  4. Graham, L. E., Datta, D., Heller, B. and Howitt, J., "A Comparative Study of Conventional and Energy- Stroing Prosthetic Feet in High-Functioning Transfemoral Amputee," Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, Vol. 88, No. 6, pp. 801- 806, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.028
  5. Freedom Innovations, LLC, "Product Information Guide," Freedom Innovations, LLC, pp. 87-94, 2008
  6. Jaegers, S. M. J. H., Arendzen, J. H. and De Jongh, H. J., "Prosthetic Gait of Unilateral Transfemoral Amputees : A Kinematic Study," Archives of PhysicalMedicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 76, No. 8, pp. 736- 743, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80528-1
  7. Nolan, L., Wit, A., Dudzinski, K., Lees, A., Lake, M. and Wychowanski, M., "Adjustments in Gait Symmetry with Walking Speed in Transfemoral andTranstibial Amputees," Gait & Posture, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 142-151, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00066-8
  8. Postema, K., Hermens, H. J., De Vries, J., Koopman, H. F. and Eisma, W. H., "Energy Storage and Release of Prosthetic Feet. Part 1: Biomechanical Analysis Related to User Benefits," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 17-27, 1997 https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649709164526
  9. Arya, A. P., Lees, A., Nirula, H. C. and Klenerman, L., "A Biomechanical Comparison of the SACH, Seattle and Jaipur Feet Using Ground Reaction Forces," Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 37-45, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3109/03093649509078230
  10. Wagner, J., Sienko, S. E., Supan, R. and Barth, D., "Motion Analysis of SACH vs Flexfoot in Moderately Active Below-Knee Amputees," Clinical Prosthetics and Orthotics, Vol. 11, pp. 55-62, 1987
  11. Barr, A. E. and Siegel, K. L., "Biomechanical Comparison of the Energy Storing Capabilities of SACH and Carbon Copy II Prosthetic feet During the Stance Phase in a Person With Below-Knee Amputation," Physical Therapy, Vol. 72, No. 5, pp. 344-354, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/72.5.344