A Study on Representation Techniques of Visual Tactility in the Surface of Contemporary Architectutre

현대건축의 표면에 나타난 시각적 촉각의 표현기법에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

Modern architecture's optical mechanism focused on Ocuularcentrism neglects the tactility of vision and tends to eliminate the optical and tactile dualism of traditional spaces by representing spaces and surfaces that are abstract and cold-hearted. In other words, all sensory experiences, except for visual experiences, are eliminated to make it impossible to create the substantial core of architecture that combines time, image, and surface textures. The fast-changing social trends, the emergence of new materials and technologies, and the corresponding development of various types of media since the Industrial Revolution have changed the paradigm of human perception and representation. With the development of media, other sensory experiences besides visual experience have been stressed and human perception has converted from single perspective to complex perspective. In result, new sensory items, such as visual tactility, have replaced the traditional vision-centered hierarchy. The composition of architectural surfaces has represented the functional and commercial needs of technology, structure, as well as the socio-cultural needs of the community. In contemporary times, it is being changed and developed by the new tactility and the corresponding expression of modern architecture. Based on the visual representation of tactility of architectural surface, this study used a composition of surface that combines various events, meanings, and senses to examine how architecture can mediate and reproduce viewers' visual experiences and discover the existential relationship between architecture and men.

Keywords

References

  1. Pallasmaa, Juhani, The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses, John Wiley & Sons, 2005
  2. Farshid Moussavi, The Function of Ornament, Actar, 2006
  3. Holl, Steven, Pallasmaa, Juhani, and Perez-Gomez, Alberto, Questions of Perception: Phenomenology of Architecture, William Stout Publishers, 2006
  4. Supermdernism, Hans Ibelings, NAi Publishers, 1998
  5. Pallasmaa, Juhani, 'Hapticity and Time. Notes on fragile architecture', in Architectural Review, May 2000, vol. 207, no.1239
  6. Branko Kolarevic, Game Set & Match II: Surface Effects: Ornament in Contemporary Architecture, Episode Publishers, 2006
  7. 할 포스터, 최연희 역, 시각과 시각성, 경성대학교출판부, 2004
  8. 마샬 맥루한, 임상원 역, 구텐베르그의 은하계, 커뮤니케이션북스, 2001
  9. 이은우, 현대성의 시각체계에 관한 연구, 서울대대학원 사회학과 박사 논문, 1998.08
  10. 김수경, 시각적 촉감을 활용한 그래픽 표현연구, 이화여자대학교 디자 인대학원 석사논문, 2004. 11
  11. 백승화, 시/청각적 촉감 인터페이스 디자인에 관한 연구 : 시각과 청 각을 이용한 촉감 구현을 중심으로 ,한국과학기술원 석사논문, 2001
  12. 권현정, 시각적 촉감과 색채감성의 연관성에 관한연구학위논문(석사)- 한국과학기술원: 산업디자인학과, 2002.08.
  13. 박희령􍾳김억, 감각적 공간 체험에 따른 촉각적 공간 구현에 관한 연 구, 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계, Vol.22 No.6, 2006
  14. 권현정, 시각적 촉각과 색체감성의 연관성에 관한 연구, 한국과학기술 원 석사학위논문, 2002
  15. 강혁, 근대주의 건축에서 모더니티의 표상에 관한 문제, 건축역사학회 2006 Vol.7 No.6
  16. 김소희, 재료의 물성에 영향을 주는 요인 연구, 한국실내디자인학회 논문집, 59호, 2006
  17. 길성호, 현대 건축가의 신체 담론에 나타난 공간성 비교, 대한건축학 회 논문집 - 계획계, Vol.20 No.4, 2004