Unethical behaviors in retail settings: Differences by consumer characteristics and anomie

소매유통환경에서의 비윤리적 행동의식: 소비자특성 및 아노미와의 관계

  • Received : 2008.06.10
  • Accepted : 2008.12.18
  • Published : 2008.12.31

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to examine the consumer beliefs on the wrongness and occurrence of unethical behaviors in retail settings, to examine the differences in unethical beliefs by consumer characteristics, and to examine the effects of anomie on unethical beliefs. A total of 609 questionnaires collected from a consumer survey were analyzed. Results revealed that respondents tended to perceive illegal activities as the most unethical and the least prevalent behaviors and downloading intellectual properties as the least unethical and the most prevalent behaviors. There were differences by age, marital status, occupation, and education in the four dimensions of unethical beliefs including actively benefiting from illegal/deceiving activities, passively benefiting at the expense of the seller, no harm/no foul, and common but questionable actions. Partial differences were observed by shopping frequency and return experience. Valuelessness of anomie affected actively benefiting from illegal/deceiving activities and no harm/no foul.

Keywords

References

  1. 각양각색 억지고객들. (2006. 3. 26). 매일신문, 자료검색 2007. 10. 20, 자료출처 http://www.imaeil.com
  2. 김정훈. (2004). 소비자 특성에 따른 소비자 비윤리 행동. 한국생활과학회지, 13(3), 417-423
  3. 김정훈, 이은희. (2003). 소비자 비윤리 유형과 판매자와의 상호작용 유형의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 41(5), 165-178
  4. 김효정. (2006). 소비자의 비윤리 상거래 행동과 관련변인 분석에 대한 연구. 한국생활과학회지, 15(6), 1015-1023
  5. 막무가내 소비자 골치. (2007. 11. 21). 파이낸셜뉴스, 자료검색 2008. 1.20, 자료출처 http://fnews.com
  6. 신상헌. (2000). 청년층 소비자들의 상거래 윤리에 관한 연구, 소비자학연구, 11(3), 153-168
  7. 중기 57% 블랙컨슈머 경험. (2007. 12. 24). 디지털타임즈, 자료검색 2008. 2. 11, 자료출처 http:/www.dt.co.kr
  8. 제미경, 서정희, 김영옥. (2004). 대학생의 소비자 비윤리 지각과 행동 및 관련 변수. 한국생활과학회지, 13(6), 891-901
  9. Brinkman, J. (2004). Looking at consumer behavior in a moral perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 51(2), 129-141 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033607.45346.d2
  10. Caruana, A., Ramaseshan, B., & Ewing, M. T. (2001). Anomia and deviant behavior in marketing: Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(5), 322-338 https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005526
  11. Cohen, J. R., Pant, L. W., & Sharp, D. J. (2001). An examination of differences in ethical decision-making between Canadian business students and accounting professionals. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 319-336 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010745425675
  12. Cole, B. C. & Smith, D. L. (1996). Perceptions of business ethics: Students vs. business people. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(8), 889-896 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381856
  13. Dodder, R. A. & Astle, D. J. (1980). A methodological analysis of Sprole's nime-item anomia scale. Multivariate Behavior Research, 15, 329-334
  14. Erffmeyer, R., Keillor, B., & LeClair, E. T. (1999). An empirical investigation of Japanese consumer ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 18(1), 35-50 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006025724126
  15. Fullerton, S., Kerch, K. B., & Dodge, H. R. (1996). Consumer ethics: An assessment of individual behavior in the market place. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(7), 805-814 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381744
  16. Fukukawa, K. (2002). Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1-2), 99-119 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021354323586
  17. King, T. & Dennis, C. (2003). Interviews of deshopping behavior: an analysis of theory of planned behavior, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 31(3), 153-163 https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550310465558
  18. Muncy, J. A. & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(4), 297-311 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(92)90036-B
  19. Murphy, P. E. & Laczniak, G. R. (1981). Marketing ethics: A review with implications for managers, educators and researchers. In B. M. Enis and K. J. Roering (eds.), Review of Marketing (pp. 251- 266), American Marketing Association: Chicago
  20. Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2001). Culture, personality and morality: A typology of international consumers' ethical beliefs. International Marketing Review, 18(2), 188-209 https://doi.org/10.1108/02651330110390006
  21. Rawwas, M. Y. A. & Singhapakdi, A. (1998). Do consumers' ethical beliefs vary with age? A substantiation of Kohlberg's typology in marketing. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), 26-38
  22. Rosenbaum, M. S. & Kuntze, R. (2003). The relationship between anomie and unethical retail disposition. Psychology and Marketing, 20(12), 1067-1093 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10109
  23. Rosenbaum, M. S. & Kuntze, R. (2005). Looking good at the retailer's expense: investigating unethical retail disposition behavior among compulsive buyers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 12(3), 217-225 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2004.07.001
  24. Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1-2), 33-47 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022907014295
  25. Vitell, S. J., Lumpkin, J. R., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (1991). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of elderly consumers. Journal of Business Ethics 10(5), 365-375 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383238
  26. Vitell, S. J. & Muncy, J. (1992). Consumer ethics: an empirical investigation of factors influencing ethical judgments of the final consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(8), 585-597 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872270
  27. Vitell, S. J. & Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy-Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267-275 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7058-9