Corrosion Science and Technology

The Corrosion Science Society of Korea (한국부식방식학회)
권호 표지

Determination of the pH of Iso-Selectivity of the Interfacial Diffusion Layer of Fe

  • Ha, Heon Young (Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuk Sang (Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology)
  • Published : 2008.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Passive metal forms an interfacial diffuse layer on the surface of passive film by its reaction with $H^+$ or $OH^-$ ions in solution depending on solution pH. There is a critical pH, called pH point of iso-selectivity ($pH_{pis}$) at which the nature of the diffuse layer is changed from the anion-permeable at pH<$pH_{pis}$ to the cation-permeable at pH>$pH_{pis}$. The $pH_{pis}$ for a passivated Fe was determined by examining the effects of pH on the thickness of passive film and on the dissolution reaction occurring on the passive film under a gavanostatic reduction in borate-phosphate buffer solutions at various pH of 7~11. The steady-state thickness of passive film formed on Fe showed the maximum at pH 8.5~9, and further the nature of film dissolution reaction was changed from a reaction producing $Fe^{3+}$ ion at $pH\leq8.5$ to that producing $FeO_2{^-}$ at $pH\geq9$, suggesting that the $pH_{pis}$ of Fe is about pH 8.5~9. In addition, the passive film formed at pH 8.5~9, $pH_{pis}$, was found to be the most protective with the lowest defect density as confirmed by the Mott-Schottky analysis. Pitting potential was decreased with increasing $Cl^-$ concentration at $pH\leq8.5$ due probably to the formation of anion permeable diffuse layer, but it was almost constant at $pH\geq9$ irrespective of $Cl^-$ concentration due primarily to the formation of cation permeable diffuse layer on the film, confirming again that $pH_{pis}$ of Fe is 8.5~9.

Keywords

References

  1. E. McCafferty, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146, 2863 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1392021
  2. M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, First English ed., Pergamon Press, Oxford (1966)
  3. D.D. Macdonald, S.R. Biaggio, and H. Song, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 170 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2069165
  4. M. Sakashita and N. Sato, Corros. Sci., 17 473 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(77)90003-8
  5. N. Sato, Electrochim. Acta, 41, 1525 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(95)00404-1
  6. A. John Sedriks, Corrosion of Stainless Steels, 2nd, Wiley-Interscience publication, Ch. 4
  7. G.J. Shugar, T. Ballinger, Chemical Technicians' Ready Reference Handbook, 3rd Ed., p. 655, McGraw Hill, New York, (1990)
  8. S.J. Ahn and H.S. Kwon, J. Electroanal. Chem., 579, 311 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2005.03.003
  9. N. Sato, Corros. Sci., 37, 1947 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(95)00076-V
  10. D.D. Macdonald, J. Electrochem. Soc., 139, 3434 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2069096
  11. D.D. Macdonald and M.U. Macdonald, J. Electrochem. Soc., 137, 2395 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2086949
  12. S.J. Ahn and H.S. Kwon, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, B482 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2048247
  13. E. Sikora and D.D. Macdonald, J. Electrochem. Soc., 147, 4087 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1394024
  14. K.N. Goswami and R.W. Staehle, Electrochim. Acta, 16, 1895 (1971) https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(71)85145-9
  15. S.J. Ahn and H.S. Kwon, Electrochim. Acta, 49, 3347 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2004.02.043