DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Predicting the Aerodynamic Characteristics of 2D Airfoil and the Performance of 3D Wind Turbine using a CFD Code

CFD에 의한 2D 에어포일 공력특성 및 3D 풍력터빈 성능예측

  • 김범석 (한국선급 에너지.산업기술센터) ;
  • 김만응 (한국선급 에너지.산업기술센터) ;
  • 이영호 (한국해양대학교 기계.정보공학부)
  • Published : 2008.07.01

Abstract

Despite of the laminar-turbulent transition region co-exist with fully turbulence region around the leading edge of an airfoil, still lots of researchers apply to fully turbulence models to predict aerodynamic characteristics. It is well known that fully turbulent model such as standard k-model couldn't predict the complex stall and the separation behavior on an airfoil accurately, it usually leads to over prediction of the aerodynamic characteristics such as lift and drag forces. So, we apply correlation based transition model to predict aerodynamic performance of the NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) Phase IV wind turbine. And also, compare the computed results from transition model with experimental measurement and fully turbulence results. Results are presented for a range of wind speed, for a NREL Phase IV wind turbine rotor. Low speed shaft torque, power, root bending moment, aerodynamic coefficients of 2D airfoil and several flow field figures results included in this study. As a result, the low speed shaft torque predicted by transitional turbulence model is very good agree with the experimental measurement in whole operating conditions but fully turbulent model(${\kappa}-\;{\varepsilon}$) over predict the shaft torque after 7m/s. Root bending moment is also good agreement between the prediction and experiments for most of the operating conditions, especially with the transition model.

Keywords

References

  1. Menter, F.R. 1994, “Two-equation Eddy-viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 1598-1605 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  2. Simms, D., Schreck, S., Hand, M. and Fingersh, L. J. 2001, “NREL Unsteady Aerodynamics Experiment in the NASA-Ames Wind Tunnel: A Comparison of Predictions to Measurements,” NREL/TP-500-29494
  3. Sommers, D.M. 1989, “Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,” Airfoils, Inc., StateCollege
  4. Sommers, D.M. 1997, “Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,” NREL/SR-440-6918
  5. Sarun Benjanirat, Lakshmi N. Sankar and Guanpeng Xu. 2003, “Evaluation of Turbulence Models for the Prediction of Wind Turbine Aerodynamics,” AIAA-2003-0517
  6. Langtry, PR.B and Menter, F.R., 2005, “Transitional Modeling for General CFD Applications in Aeronautics,” AIAA Paper 2005-522
  7. Langtry, R.B. Gola, J. and Menter., F.R., 2006, “Predicting 2D Airfoil and 3D Wind Turbine Rotor Performance using a Transition Model for General CFD Codes,” AIAA 2006-0395
  8. Kim, B.S., 2005, “A Study on the Optimum Blade Design and the Aerodynamic Performance Analysis for the Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Doctoral dissertation, Korea Maritime University
  9. Walter P. Wolfe, Stuart S. Ochs. 1997, “CFD Calculation of S809 Aerodynamic Characteristics,” AIAA-97-0973

Cited by

  1. Numerical Analysis on Performance Improvement for Wind Blade by the Groove vol.35, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2011.35.4.475
  2. Atmospheric Icing Effects on the Aerodynamic Characteristics and Performance of Wind Turbine Blade vol.42, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2014.42.2.134
  3. Aerodynamic optimal blade design and performance analysis of 3 MW wind turbine blade with AEP enhancement for low-wind-speed-sites vol.8, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4967971
  4. Design of a 2MW Blade for Wind Turbine and Uni-Directional Fluid Structure Interaction Simulation vol.33, pp.12, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2009.33.12.1007
  5. Performance Prediction of Wind Power Turbine by CFD Analysis vol.37, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2013.37.4.423
  6. Development of Load-Cell-Based Anemovane vol.37, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2013.37.5.685
  7. Numerical investigation of three turbulence simulation models for S809 wind turbine airfoil pp.2041-2967, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650918767301